Any idea what application this was designed for? Visually identical to the LE8T, except the cone is very, VERY thin, no Aquaplas.
Specs?
Thanks.
Any idea what application this was designed for? Visually identical to the LE8T, except the cone is very, VERY thin, no Aquaplas.
Specs?
Thanks.
bo
"Indeed, not!!"
The LE8T-2 is the home version of the 2115A.
Fs = 55 Hz
Qms = 4
Vas = 36 liters
Cms = 761 ĩm/N
Mms = 11 g
Rms = 0.95 mohms
Xmax = 5.588 mm
Xmech = 11.18 mm
P-Dia = 152.4 mm
Sd = 0.0183 sq.m
P-Vd = 102 cu.cm
Qes = 0.54
Re = 5.5 ohms
Le = 0.3 mH
Z = 8 ohms
BL = 6.2 Tm
Pe = 30 watts
Qts = 0.48
no = 1.07 %
1-W SPL = 92.4 dB
2.83-V SPL = 94.1 dB
(The LE8TX is a 16 ohm version.)
Last edited by 4313B; 04-30-2003 at 09:59 AM.
I may be making this up, but I seem to remember that it was the variant used in the Aquarius 4.
Yep, the S109 Aquarius IV, along with the LE20-1 and LX12-7
Giskard - those T-S parameters for the LE8T-2 produce a decidedly different response curve from the LE8T and the 2215A (using WinISD 0.44).
All told, it looks like the LE8T is the superior full-range transducer? It doesn't roll off until 40Hz, hitting -3dB at 35.6Hz. Thoughts?
Thanks again to both you and Mr Widget!
bo
"Indeed, not!!"
Thoughts about what?
When the library comes back on line, look up the Aquarius 4 and in the description of it's development they explain how and why the driver was modified.
Basically the LE8t-2 is pretty use specific.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)