Quote Originally Posted by Ian Mackenzie
The lower mass and hence vastly superior transient capabilty is the issue.

You can EQ the crap out of any driver/ horn and it will look flat to the naked eye but that's not how it sounds.
I agree... the lower mass of the 077/2405 has my vote. We did run a measurement of the Cat eye with a 2405 diaphragm. It had essentially the same raggedness as the stock Cat eye, but with a slightly extended top end.

I will audition them at some point. While curves do not lie, they don't tell the whole story.

Widget