JBL 2214H Build....L100T or 4425 ?

[Ian Mackenzie]

These are the things JBL don’t want to talk about when they promote how good a new innovative is with their cowboy marketing. Nor did they differentiate the performance of the 2234H versus the 2235H. Practitioners knew the 4435 with the 2234H was vastly more accurate more accurate. They commented it’s a faster driver (midrange).

The 2235H also had less travel before damage as the mass ring would slap on the pole piece.

The better way would have been to use the 2234H in the 4430 with an external LF EQ. The marketing department were the problem. EV did this and it didn’t bother anyone that l am aware off.

Edit . I edited my rant because the milk was spilt a long time.

Oh the 4343 Bi Amp switch was also the work of the JBL marketing department and we fixed that issue….Lol.

[turnitdown]

I've never seen that explained before. Thank you. I am saving this page and probably will get a mini DSP. I have some 2225s I was going to re-cone to 2235 (aftermarket) and add the mass rings in my possession, but I may leave out the mass rings and use DSP to cross to the 2344s. I might as well give in to the new reality of active crossovers.