Thank you for all the encouraging comments. This project has consumed a few hours so far. :-)
Emilime, I don't know what the net volume is. Mine are probably a few liters smaller due to additional bracing, bigger driver, longer ports and additional damping. The latter would acoustically probably enlarge the cabinet but the rest would not.
I have no passive XO's in the cabinets so maybe they are where they should be.
The shop amps are dual Alesis RA300's (2x90W RMS) connected to my shop BSS DSP XO. I use two amps to be able to run 3-way, if needed, and use the last channel as direct reference to tara out the electronics when using dual channel measuring. That way I don't really have to calibrate the electronics as I only measure the difference between a "clean" signal after the power amp and the microphone signal.
As far as I understand the difference between 2216Nd and -1 is a thin ribbon of Aquaplas on the rear side of the cone to increase the Q and potentially a stronger magnet to compensate. I have not seen a spec on the -1 but the 2216Nd is in the driver info section here, courtesy by Giskard. However, someone from JBL once told med (right or wrong) that the -1 has a stronger magnet to achieve the lower end in combination with the heavier cone in a passive structure.
This should theoretically give some more deep bass without active filters/DSP. If you run with the original filters you may have to measure the low end and maybe compensate with tone controls/EQ/DSP. That is what the M2 people do anyway :-) . If you go active you are good to goo. Just adjust in the filter/DSP +3-6db @ 30-ish Hz.
I have had both and cannot identify any sonic difference in the all so important midrange.
Happy Friday
//Rob
The solution to the problem changes the problem.
-And always remember that all of your equipment was made by the lowest bidder
Hello Widget
Depends on the software. With mine I can model double flared, single flared and just about any other configuration. Also the instructions that come with them are quite good you end up calculating the length of straight section that joins the flares. Too answer your question I have had issues with port noise on a couple of JBL's but the smaller systems.
Rob![]()
"I could be arguing in my spare time"
Finally after many years the 4367M's are finally live. Still quite a lot of work on curves but promising.
Today is the first day I play music on both of them. I did build a basic streamer with a RPi 4 feeding a BLU-USB digitally (via USB) and then digitally to the BSS DSP, and hence nothing analogue in the chain. The BLU DSP feeds two CTS600 under each 4367. Volume is done in the digital domain in the BSS.
I will move to a different BSS within a few weeks that has digital out card and use SOTA external DAC's. Don't really know it it makes any difference but just because I can and have most of the stuff :-) .
But for now it is pretty enjoyable. I can share the curves later when I'm done.
As of now I will tweak them a little and then compare with my M2/476Be/045 as can be seen in the picture. I will probable also add my LSR6332/LSR6312 and my small Genelec references to compare.
Let the feast begin.
The solution to the problem changes the problem.
-And always remember that all of your equipment was made by the lowest bidder
Nice!!!
![]()
Yes Very Nice!!!
Rob![]()
"I could be arguing in my spare time"
Splendid, they really turned out great! I bet it's quite rewarding to be able to finally listen to them after all the time and effort you've put in.
It seems the 2216's knocked out the bear though!
Would be very helpful if you could share the dsp-setup; filters, eq etc when ready.
Just out of curiosity, how do your FR usually end up? Do you go for a Harman-like curve, a flat line or perhaps concave?
Damned good work there Rob
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)