Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 38 of 38

Thread: Jbl 4349

  1. #31
    Senior Member davidpou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    154
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    Do you mean loss of interest?

    For me personally, I guess so... not completely, but as JBL has evolved from a company that supported almost every product they ever produced to one that barely supports current products and really sucks about supporting their legacy products, I have lost most of my interest in the brand. I still have a soft spot for the vintage systems and respect the designs of GT.


    Widget
    I feel you, but as big as was GT, there cannot be only one man in the history of a brand, can it ? i do not know the filiation of engineers as much as you do, but there was a before GT, and of course, there will be an after... and these guys might love the brand just as much as you did... and there would be doomed for not being GT ?
    Last edited by davidpou; 11-27-2020 at 12:18 PM. Reason: orhtographe

  2. #32
    Senior Member davidpou's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2010
    Location
    Paris
    Posts
    154

    Post

    Quote Originally Posted by DK11706 View Post
    My initially thoughts about the 4349 was that horn/woofer ratio was wrong and that it looked funny, but that is not the case in real life, I have attached a few pictures for you to judge. The one with the flat screen TV is to give you an idea of the size, the TV is 65" and the speakers are 2,5 meters apart
    I know WE don't believe in "new classics", that the vintage JBL is better than all the new stuff, and JBL is not the same without GT, but I'm telling you, the 4349 will prove us all wrong....a star is born
    Thanks for the post ! they haven't reached France as yet !
    Do you measure for placement or is it just the length of your cables that decides ?
    cause from measurements , like the other JBL, a good 80 cm off from the wall couldn't harm....

  3. #33
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,720
    I don’t mean to sound like I am worshiping at the temple of GT. There have been many excellent engineers at JBL, starting with Mr. Lansing himself. In my opinion most of the best engineering that has gone on at JBL has been in the design of their raw drivers. Most of the systems that were designed prior to GT joining the team were not commensurate with the quality level of the parts used.

    As GT matured as a speaker designer he came up with a number of seriously great speakers. Some of his designs were hampered by marketing requirements, budget, or other factors, but so many of his designs were serious home runs.

    Today I think the best work going on at JBL is on the Pro side. Many of the current generation of JBL Pro speakers are really outstanding. And, I am sure many of their better consumer products are good too. My biggest beef is with the company’s current values. Up until the early 2000s you could get replacement parts for virtually any JBL product made going back to the 50s. Today if you own a 10 year old JBL or Revel, good luck getting a blown driver repaired.


    Widget

  4. #34
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2012
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    23
    Quote Originally Posted by davidpou View Post
    Thanks for the post ! they haven't reached France as yet !
    Do you measure for placement or is it just the length of your cables that decides ?
    cause from measurements , like the other JBL, a good 80 cm off from the wall couldn't harm....

    The cables are long enough to go all the way to the end of the room. I have adjusted them after the burn-in time, a bit further into the room and closer together with minimum toe-in. I would like to get closer to the 80 cm boundary but I'm already pushing my wife's interior design to the limits with my setup, so for now that's a no-go

    I'm still very excited about this speaker, they are not the most detailed I've heard but it makes them sound okay with newer pop/rock compressed recordings, which suits me fine. On the more positive side, I love their ability to present/separate the material playing, it's outstanding, you can actually hear if the musicians are in sync and how they attack their instruments. Take for example Tom Petty & The Heartbreakers, the first thing that comes to mind is how well they handle their instruments, how well they compliment each other and how they sound like a unity, then if I play something else like a Swedish band called Sabaton, which sound great in my car, they a picked apart by the JBL making them sound like something from amateurs night at the local bar, that is very impressive for a speaker at this price.

    Link to a review
    https://www.hifitest.de/test/lautspr...jbl-4349_20054

  5. #35
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2012
    Location
    New Zealand
    Posts
    1
    Quote Originally Posted by DK11706 View Post
    The 4349 arrived as planned last Friday, they have been playing ever since for at least 8 hours a day. How the sound signature has changed during the burn-in is insane, they went from a very sloppy bass and compressed top, to a very punchy and dynamic bass with a very wide and open top without any trace of sibilance. Right now they are screaming at me, begging me to go even louder although I'm already half deaf from listening to Neil Young's "Like A Hurricane" at insane volume.

    The finish compared to the JBL 4429 and especially the 4367, is immaculate, all lines match up perfectly and the black paint/oil treatment (don't know the English word for that) is also perfect including the sharp edges.

    My initially thoughts about the 4349 was that horn/woofer ratio was wrong and that it looked funny, but that is not the case in real life, I have attached a few pictures for you to judge. The one with the flat screen TV is to give you an idea of the size, the TV is 65" and the speakers are 2,5 meters apart.

    Attachment 87588Attachment 87589


    It's a whole new world for me, I can't think of anything bad about these speakers at the moment , normally I have at least 2 or 3 things I don't like and fool around with placement for weeks. The 4349 I placed for "best look in the room", and have absolutely no plans about moving them.

    I know WE don't believe in "new classics", that the vintage JBL is better than all the new stuff, and JBL is not the same without GT, but I'm telling you, the 4349 will prove us all wrong....a star is born
    Was already keen to try these speakers even before your experience! Think they might do just the trick on the end of a bridged integrated amp we just bought. Usually head for the walnut finish but the black finish looks unexpectedly handsome in your room. Is the baffle also black or is it blue?

  6. #36
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,628
    The 4349 was tested on ASR: https://www.audiosciencereview.com/f...speaker.22686/

    Clearly bad design choices at play...

    Is posted a rant there, but I will repost it here in an effort to ease my nerves:
    Quote Originally Posted by pos
    I am pretty upset reading this review. What was JBL thinking when designing this speaker?
    A 1.5kHz crossover (or is it 1.7kHz like initially published?) is way too high for this woofer, and the result was to be expected.

    The 1200Fe (or whatever variation this speaker is using) is a great woofer, one of the best for this size, but it was never intended to play this high, and that is clearly visible in the tolerance boundaries for the frequency test procedure found in its EDS:
    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...1&d=1216860198
    A +/- 3dB unit-to-unit variation is allowed above 1356Hz, which is pretty normal given the random breakups that can occur with such a cone, but this is clearly no place for a crossover. This means that anomalies found with the unit tested here might not be there with another unit, or might be worse. Anything can happen exactly where everything should be under tight control.

    And even if that tolerance issue was solved (might be the purpose of this particular variation, but that would imply pushing breakups modes further up: good luck doing that with a paper cone of this size), there is no way it would play nice with a compression driver up there.
    I used to have a pair of 4425, employing an - arguably not as good - 12" woofer crossing to a compression driver at 1.2kHz, and the transition was very audible. They solved the problem with the 4429 going as low as 800 or 900Hz with the 1200Fe, pairing it with a small metal dome compression driver and a wide directivity horn to match directivity.
    Now we are back to a 1.5kHz crossover, Eon territories with premium drivers...

    I get it that the D2415K cannot play low, but then they should have used another compression driver for the task and crossover no higher than 1kHz (and preferably lower).
    The 175Nd in the 4429 had no issue there, as did the poor 2416H in the 4425 at 1200Hz, and those were clearly not premium drivers at the time.
    The new dual ring radiators are pretty good when it comes to high SPL (as seen in the Vertec and other JBL PA speakers) and HF, but it is notorious that they are struggling at low frequencies (eg the D2430K, which shows increased distortion under 2kHz compared to a classic 4" diaphragm compression driver), so this is no wonder that half the radiating area for the D2415K compared to the D2430K would require such a high crossover frequency. JBL does not do dome compression drivers anymore, and even had to use Radian drivers in the new Everest, but these ring radiators are also probably much cheaper to produce compared to metal dome drivers, so they should have just used the D2430K in the 4349, and call it a day.

    This is shameful, how can they market this in the synthesis lineup with such compromises in the design??
    I do have a pair of 1200Fe and D2430K here, but I would clearly never intend to make them play together.

    These speakers probably sound good overall, they better do with the drivers at hand, but the result should be textbook perfect. Anything less than that is an insult to all the efforts and years of evolution that went into the components and technologies used here.

    If only Greg Timbers was still in command there, I bet this would have turned out quite differently...

    Well... sorry for the rant
    I'd like to say that I feel better now, but frankly I don't...

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,942
    Lots of thoughts going on here.

    My take is JBL did some research and built a business case for a sibling to fit in with their other offerings.

    If it sells that’s all that matters. If your in a shop you will likely compare this model to others and make a decision based on your budget. The smaller and lower cost models are always going to have compromises but it’s not that relevant to the kind of customer they are targeting this model at.

    A larger horn would bring down the crossover point but the increased box width would compromise the aesthetic. So would a smaller woofer and it might not sell at all in spite of better objective performance.

    There are thousands of narrow tower loudspeakers on the market that might be technically more appropriate. If you want that go and buy it. Jbl incidentally market some new tower based consumer models for that kind of market.

    Companies like Spendor manufacture smallish bookshelf loudspeakers which are not doubt better performing on paper. But they are inefficient and sound like a tiny loudspeaker.

    One final point. The loudspeaker industry will well aware of differing listening preferences in various parts of the world. This is related to language and as a consequence how sounds are interpreted.
    So there are going to be differing opinions on forums like this. My advice is let your ears be the judge and not the measurements. Measurements don’t convey the dynamic character or the subtle tonal character of a loudspeaker system or how well it will work in a particular room.

  8. #38
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,743
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    To me they look like a product that was designed to look like a professional monitor, but is aimed at the home market.
    I would hope they might rate more than that if only because the cost seems to be nearly $10,000 USD.
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •