Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 33

Thread: Everest DD66000

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    136

    Everest DD66000

    Hi.
    A question regarding the low end.
    can someone explain why its not possible to use one woofer that goes all the way down to 20hz.
    insted of using to woofers that both roll of around 40hz.?

  2. #2
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Simple answer: They wanted to keep the sensitivity above 89dB watt.

    The woofers will plumb the depths well, but need a bit of electronic nudging.


    Widget

  3. #3
    Senior Member Valentin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    725
    Two Woofers
    Increases sensitivityat low frequency as Widget says
    Doublethe radiation area so only have the displacement is needed at agiven intensity /freq , this gives you less distortion. Having two motors givesyou more thermal advantages having a system that will be linear at very highlevels of continuous play . The system will not compress and dynamics will notsuffer linearity and the spectralbalance will be preserved

  4. #4
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian DK View Post
    Hi.
    A question regarding the low end.
    can someone explain why its not possible to use one woofer that goes all the way down to 20hz.
    insted of using to woofers that both roll of around 40hz.?
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget View Post
    Simple answer: They wanted to keep the sensitivity above 89dB watt.

    The woofers will plumb the depths well, but need a bit of electronic nudging.


    Widget
    By using a second "helper" woofer, a designer is able to take advantage of the increased sensitivity caused by the bafffle step response of a system. This is how the Everest II maintains its higher sensitivity despite the fact that only one woofer is used up to the horn.

    If the second "helper" woofer didn't exist to fill in the bottom end then the crossover network would have to have a mechanism to deal with the baffle step response and the resulting system sensitivity would be exactly what one would expect from a single woofer system.

  5. #5
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    Quote Originally Posted by Brian DK View Post
    ....insted of using to woofers that both roll of around 40hz.?

    I suppose you don't own the Everest DD66000?
    You really should not worry because of the datasheet low end roll off of these speakers. In my room I have flat response down to 20Hz.
    If you need lower, by a servo sub.
    Some people need lower, some not, me not.

    The "helper" woofer design was already very successful in the 4435 and is continued with the Ev2 (with finer woofers). It works well

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    La Habra, California USA
    Posts
    1,546
    Great info and nice explanation.
    When faced with another JBL find, Good mech986 says , JBL Fan mech986 says

  7. #7
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Anyone know the status of the 66000->67000 update kit that was being considered?
    (1501AL-2 drivers... perhaps minor x-over changes)

  8. #8
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,736
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
    Anyone know the status of the 66000->67000 update kit that was being considered?
    (1501AL-2 drivers... perhaps minor x-over changes)
    Oooo...interesting.
    "Audio is filled with dangerous amateurs." --- Tim de Paravicini

  9. #9
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    They're having a real tough time convincing Mexico to make them above and beyond what is needed for whole systems.

    They have very little interest in making raw drivers.

  10. #10
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Wow... tail wagging the dog. That's just sad.

  11. #11
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Evidently Northridge is getting complaints from all over the planet (DD66000 owners).

  12. #12
    Senior Member Lee in Montreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    2,487
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
    Anyone know the status of the 66000->67000 update kit that was being considered?
    (1501AL-2 drivers... perhaps minor x-over changes)
    Dos it mean there will be used 1501AL-1 up for grab?

  13. #13
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Lee, you probably mean 1501AL: the 1501AL-1 is the new iteration made for the 65000.
    Looking at the klippel measurements in the EDS that one is a real beast when it come to linearity at high excursion.
    I am curious to know how they managed to make this one that much better than the previous 150xAL, as it look very similar in conception (rubber surround).
    Or maybe it is just a difference in the distortion measurement technique? (EDS for the "old" ones did not include klippel measurements for that matter...)

  14. #14
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    At the very least, the -2 cone is a paper/foam/paper laminate in the latest iteration.
    I don't recall if there were other driver changes. Very nicely, the driver info has been
    provided and is available in the Technical Reference section if you wish to dig through it.
    The designer indicated a fairly strong preference for the new driver, so that was good
    enough for me (although it is nice to see the technical differences)

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Denmark
    Posts
    136
    Quote Originally Posted by Guido View Post
    I suppose you don't own the Everest DD66000?
    You really should not worry because of the datasheet low end roll off of these speakers. In my room I have flat response down to 20Hz.
    If you need lower, by a servo sub.
    Some people need lower, some not, me not.

    The "helper" woofer design was already very successful in the 4435 and is continued with the Ev2 (with finer woofers). It works well
    Yes, I own the Everest Dd66000. And I dont realy miss anything.
    its the best allround sounding speaker I have heart.

    But in some kind of Music I somtimes miss a bit low end, the Music seems a bit bright..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. DD66000 Everest II
    By Techbot in forum System Information
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-15-2020, 01:48 PM
  2. Jbl Everest Dd66000
    By ronaltronics in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 06-04-2017, 12:45 PM
  3. EVEREST DD66000
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 295
    Last Post: 07-19-2009, 03:53 PM
  4. Development of the Everest DD66000
    By Jan Daugaard in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 08-07-2008, 02:06 AM
  5. lsr curves for everest dd66000
    By Valentin in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 09-06-2007, 08:25 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •