Page 83 of 113 FirstFirst ... 3373818283848593 ... LastLast
Results 1,231 to 1,245 of 1683

Thread: JBL Master Reference Monitor

  1. #1231
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    It appears that both the 3.3uF and 4.7uf Wima MKP10 250V exist in two different models with different dimensions and pitch.
    That could explain the size difference we see from different networks, probably dictated by said models availability.

    Name:  Wima MKP10.PNG
Views: 1836
Size:  20.0 KB

  2. #1232
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    761
    Quote Originally Posted by pos View Post
    Why didn't you tell us before?!
    I wanted to watch you fail bigtime for a while, like you did before helping me

  3. #1233
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629



    Looking back at Valentin's photo of the network, it can clearly be seen that the 3.3uF is stated as C2...
    So it appears JBL did indeed misprint its network description.
    Let's hope it was not intentional at least


  4. #1234
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by pos View Post
    That would bring the 1st order high pass filter from 209Hz up to 1kHz (!), which is of course a completely different scenario, going from a mere protection filter to a real component of the actual crossover.
    Same topology as the 4430/4435 in bi-amp mode.

    If such is the case then it is even less expensive to bias that circuit.

  5. #1235
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    761
    What is the logic of using capacitators as part of the crossover for an dsp active speaker?
    For protection I understand, but why in the hearable register? I do not understand why.

  6. #1236
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    It does not hurt either, and is less expensive (smaller caps).
    (Geddes even uses smaller cap values, with a cutoff frequency in the 10kHz+ range, in order to also do the CD compensation together with the filter)

    But then you absolutely need a lpad between the driver and cap in order to linearize the inductance, because the fs and associated inductance peak will be right into the stop band and (badly) influence the response of the filter...

    If you need a lpad because of the hiss of your DSP/amp then the smaller cap is a no brainer.
    In my own M2 "clone" I will probably only use a protection cap (fs between 200Hz and 300Hz), no lpad, and do the actual filtering entirely in the DSP.

  7. #1237
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    761
    Quote Originally Posted by pos View Post
    In my own M2 "clone" I will probably only use a protection cap (fs between 200Hz and 300Hz), no lpad, and do the actual filtering entirely in the DSP.
    I know you do not agree, but I would not use a protection cap on the relatively low priced D2-driver.
    There was an (subjective) sound-degradation when I added protection-cap.

  8. #1238
    Senior Member Hoerninger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,892
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    ... to bias that circuit.
    Quote Originally Posted by bubbleboy76 View Post
    There was an (subjective) sound-degradation when I added protection-cap.
    You didn't CC, did you?
    ____________
    Peter

  9. #1239
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    761
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoerninger View Post
    You didn't CC, did you?
    ____________
    Peter
    Nope.
    And no bypass-cap either

  10. #1240
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Low price or not, what are you going to do when the driver turns NLA?

  11. #1241
    Senior Member audiomagnate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado and Georgia
    Posts
    1,022
    Quote Originally Posted by bubbleboy76 View Post
    I know you do not agree, but I would not use a protection cap on the relatively low priced D2-driver.
    There was an (subjective) sound-degradation when I added protection-cap.
    I don't "believe" in exotic cables, burn in and most of the other things many audiophiles swear exist, but I have been playing around with speakers for a long time, and I hear a significant degradation of sound when a blocking cap is used on an electronically crossed over driver, particularly tweeters. I ride bareback and try to be careful. For me the risk is far outweighed by the reward, and 2405's ain't cheap these days.

  12. #1242
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2008
    Location
    Ashland, MA
    Posts
    908
    Quote Originally Posted by audiomagnate View Post
    I don't "believe" in exotic cables, burn in and most of the other things many audiophiles swear exist, but I have been playing around with speakers for a long time, and I hear a significant degradation of sound when a blocking cap is used on an electronically crossed over driver, particularly tweeters. I ride bareback and try to be careful. For me the risk is far outweighed by the reward, and 2405's ain't cheap these days.
    It has to be factored in as an extra pole in the filter design, but I've seen too many electronic misbehaviors to trust my tweeters without passive protection. The real challenge is in the implementation- if you make it small enough to maximize efficacy of protection, it's going to interact with the impedance swings at the low end of a typical CD/horn's passband. If you go (much) bigger, you lose a chunk of the protection value, it's part of why I tend to stay with full passives lately- I need to do so much work to make the tweeter cap perform as I want, that I might as well just stay passive.

  13. #1243
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Well considering that all the stock crossovers in all of the statement speaker have series capacitors I don't understand what the issue is. Yes they are charge coupled and use combinations of electrolytic and film but still. Not even going to get into the Array series which doesn't charge couple them.

    You guy guys must use some absolutely awful capacitors.

    If you want to take the chance of damaging what could be an unobtanium driver in the near future have at it.

    Rob
    "I could be arguing in my spare time"

  14. #1244
    Senior Member audiomagnate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado and Georgia
    Posts
    1,022
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Well considering that all the stock crossovers in all of the statement speaker have series capacitors I don't understand what the issue is. Yes they are charge coupled and use combinations of electrolytic and film but still. Not even going to get into the Array series which doesn't charge couple them.

    You guy guys must use some absolutely awful capacitors.

    If you want to take the chance of damaging what could be an unobtanium driver in the near future have at it.

    Rob
    Why would they become unobtanium? There have to be thousands upon thousands of them deployed in huge venue arrays all over the world.

  15. #1245
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Quote Originally Posted by audiomagnate View Post
    Why would they become unobtanium? There have to be thousands upon thousands of them deployed in huge venue arrays all over the world.
    If you want to take some used cast offs from the pro tour world, be my guest.

    I would definitely use a protection cap. I have done numerous experiments, and no one has been able to reliably pick out when the caps were in the circuit or not.


    Widget

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. TAD MODEL-1 REFERENCE MONITOR
    By gerard in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-14-2014, 02:52 PM
  2. NAD Master Series
    By Domino in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-05-2008, 09:34 PM
  3. L100T/L100S as a reference/studio monitor
    By ldizac in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-16-2006, 10:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •