Page 34 of 113 FirstFirst ... 2432333435364484 ... LastLast
Results 496 to 510 of 1683

Thread: JBL Master Reference Monitor

  1. #496
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Allegedly all the graphs are in this thread somewhere. Here is the data.

    Object(9.35.1): Ch1 Input EQ Filters
    Enable 1 = 0 Frequency 1 = 1kHz Q 1 = 4 Slope 1 = 6 Gain 1 = 0dB Type 1 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 2 = 0 Frequency 2 = 1kHz Q 2 = 4 Slope 2 = 6 Gain 2 = 0dB Type 2 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 3 = 0 Frequency 3 = 1kHz Q 3 = 4 Slope 3 = 6 Gain 3 = 0dB Type 3 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 4 = 0 Frequency 4 = 1kHz Q 4 = 4 Slope 4 = 6 Gain 4 = 0dB Type 4 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 5 = 0 Frequency 5 = 1kHz Q 5 = 4 Slope 5 = 6 Gain 5 = 0dB Type 5 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 6 = 0 Frequency 6 = 1kHz Q 6 = 4 Slope 6 = 6 Gain 6 = 0dB Type 6 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 7 = 0 Frequency 7 = 1kHz Q 7 = 4 Slope 7 = 6 Gain 7 = 0dB Type 7 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 8 = 0 Frequency 8 = 1kHz Q 8 = 4 Slope 8 = 6 Gain 8 = 0dB Type 8 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 9 = 1 Frequency 9 = 500Hz Q 9 = 5.26 Slope 9 = 6 Gain 9 = 1.1dB Type 9 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 10 = 1 Frequency 10 = 900Hz Q 10 = 4.38 Slope 10 = 6 Gain 10 = 1.6dB Type 10 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 11 = 1 Frequency 11 = 1.15kHz Q 11 = 7.43 Slope 11 = 6 Gain 11 = 1.4dB Type 11 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 12 = 1 Frequency 12 = 1.6kHz Q 12 = 3.13 Slope 12 = 6 Gain 12 = -0.9dB Type 12 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 13 = 1 Frequency 13 = 2.54kHz Q 13 = 9.72 Slope 13 = 6 Gain 13 = -1.1dB Type 13 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 14 = 1 Frequency 14 = 3.25kHz Q 14 = 7.07 Slope 14 = 6 Gain 14 = 1.3dB Type 14 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 15 = 0 Frequency 15 = 1kHz Q 15 = 4 Slope 15 = 6 Gain 15 = 0dB Type 15 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 16 = 0 Frequency 16 = 1kHz Q 16 = 4 Slope 16 = 6 Gain 16 = 0dB Type 16 = Parametric EQ
    Bypass 1 Thru 8 = 0 Bypass 9 Thru 16 = 0


    Object(9.35.2): Ch2 Input EQ Filters
    Enable 1 = 0 Frequency 1 = 1kHz Q 1 = 4 Slope 1 = 6 Gain 1 = 0dB Type 1 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 2 = 0 Frequency 2 = 1kHz Q 2 = 4 Slope 2 = 6 Gain 2 = 0dB Type 2 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 3 = 0 Frequency 3 = 1kHz Q 3 = 4 Slope 3 = 6 Gain 3 = 0dB Type 3 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 4 = 0 Frequency 4 = 1kHz Q 4 = 4 Slope 4 = 6 Gain 4 = 0dB Type 4 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 5 = 0 Frequency 5 = 1kHz Q 5 = 4 Slope 5 = 6 Gain 5 = 0dB Type 5 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 6 = 0 Frequency 6 = 1kHz Q 6 = 4 Slope 6 = 6 Gain 6 = 0dB Type 6 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 7 = 0 Frequency 7 = 1kHz Q 7 = 4 Slope 7 = 6 Gain 7 = 0dB Type 7 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 8 = 0 Frequency 8 = 1kHz Q 8 = 4 Slope 8 = 6 Gain 8 = 0dB Type 8 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 9 = 0 Frequency 9 = 1kHz Q 9 = 4 Slope 9 = 6 Gain 9 = 0dB Type 9 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 10 = 0 Frequency 10 = 1kHz Q 10 = 4 Slope 10 = 6 Gain 10 = 0dB Type 10 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 11 = 0 Frequency 11 = 1kHz Q 11 = 4 Slope 11 = 6 Gain 11 = 0dB Type 11 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 12 = 0 Frequency 12 = 1kHz Q 12 = 4 Slope 12 = 6 Gain 12 = 0dB Type 12 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 13 = 0 Frequency 13 = 1kHz Q 13 = 4 Slope 13 = 6 Gain 13 = 0dB Type 13 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 14 = 0 Frequency 14 = 1kHz Q 14 = 4 Slope 14 = 6 Gain 14 = 0dB Type 14 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 15 = 0 Frequency 15 = 1kHz Q 15 = 4 Slope 15 = 6 Gain 15 = 0dB Type 15 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 16 = 0 Frequency 16 = 1kHz Q 16 = 4 Slope 16 = 6 Gain 16 = 0dB Type 16 = Parametric EQ
    Bypass 1 Thru 8 = 0 Bypass 9 Thru 16 = 0


    Object(10.36.1): Ch1 IIR Crossover Filters
    Highpass Enable = 1 Highpass Frequency = 782Hz Highpass Type = Butterworth 6dB/oct Lowpass Enable = 0 Lowpass Frequency = 500Hz Lowpass Type = Linkwitz-Riley 24dB/oct


    Object(10.36.2): Ch2 IIR Crossover Filters
    Highpass Enable = 0 Highpass Frequency = 500Hz Highpass Type = Linkwitz-Riley 24dB/oct Lowpass Enable = 1 Lowpass Frequency = 790Hz Lowpass Type = Linkwitz-Riley 36dB/oct


    Object(11.37.1): Ch1 FIR Filter
    Enable = 0 Frequency = 500Hz Mode = Bandpass Latency48KHz = 3.17 ms Latency96KHz = 29.33 ms Type = Linear phase 48 dB/oct


    Object(11.37.2): Ch2 FIR Filter
    Enable = 0 Frequency = 1.2kHz Mode = Lowpass Latency48KHz = 3.17 ms Latency96KHz = 29.33 ms Type = Linear phase 48 dB/oct


    Object(12.34.1): Ch1 Speaker EQ Filters
    Enable 1 = 1 Frequency 1 = 760Hz Q 1 = 2.5 Slope 1 = 6 Gain 1 = -4.3dB Type 1 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 2 = 1 Frequency 2 = 7.1kHz Q 2 = 4 Slope 2 = 11 Gain 2 = 5dB Type 2 = HP Shelf EQ
    Enable 3 = 1 Frequency 3 = 3.1kHz Q 3 = 3.5 Slope 3 = 6 Gain 3 = -5.6dB Type 3 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 4 = 1 Frequency 4 = 1kHz Q 4 = 3 Slope 4 = 6 Gain 4 = 1.5dB Type 4 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 5 = 1 Frequency 5 = 4kHz Q 5 = 6.56 Slope 5 = 6 Gain 5 = -1dB Type 5 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 6 = 1 Frequency 6 = 9.37kHz Q 6 = 10.16 Slope 6 = 6 Gain 6 = 2dB Type 6 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 7 = 1 Frequency 7 = 11.2kHz Q 7 = 13.25 Slope 7 = 6 Gain 7 = 2dB Type 7 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 8 = 1 Frequency 8 = 16kHz Q 8 = 5.26 Slope 8 = 6 Gain 8 = 2dB Type 8 = Parametric EQ
    Bypass = 0 Enable 9 = 0 Frequency 9 = 1kHz Q 9 = 4 Slope 9 = 6 Gain 9 = 0dB
    Type 9 = Parametric EQ Enable 10 = 0 Frequency 10 = 1kHz Q 10 = 4 Slope 10 = 6 Gain 10 = 0dB
    Type 10 = Parametric EQ Enable 11 = 0 Frequency 11 = 1kHz Q 11 = 4 Slope 11 = 6 Gain 11 = 0dB
    Type 11 = Parametric EQ Enable 12 = 0 Frequency 12 = 1kHz Q 12 = 4 Slope 12 = 6 Gain 12 = 0dB
    Type 12 = Parametric EQ


    Object(12.34.2): Ch2 Speaker EQ Filters
    Enable 1 = 1 Frequency 1 = 135Hz Q 1 = 4 Slope 1 = 5.5 Gain 1 = -8dB Type 1 = HP Shelf EQ
    Enable 2 = 1 Frequency 2 = 254Hz Q 2 = 10 Slope 2 = 6 Gain 2 = 2.6dB Type 2 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 3 = 1 Frequency 3 = 340Hz Q 3 = 3 Slope 3 = 6 Gain 3 = -0.5dB Type 3 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 4 = 1 Frequency 4 = 197.5Hz Q 4 = 6.31 Slope 4 = 6 Gain 4 = 0.9dB Type 4 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 5 = 1 Frequency 5 = 21.5Hz Q 5 = 1.77 Slope 5 = 6 Gain 5 = 4.7dB Type 5 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 6 = 1 Frequency 6 = 61.5Hz Q 6 = 5.32 Slope 6 = 6 Gain 6 = -0.8dB Type 6 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 7 = 1 Frequency 7 = 236Hz Q 7 = 6.56 Slope 7 = 6 Gain 7 = 0.4dB Type 7 = Parametric EQ
    Enable 8 = 1 Frequency 8 = 400Hz Q 8 = 7.43 Slope 8 = 6 Gain 8 = -0.5dB Type 8 = Parametric EQ
    Bypass = 0 Enable 9 = 0 Frequency 9 = 1kHz Q 9 = 4 Slope 9 = 6 Gain 9 = 0dB
    Type 9 = Parametric EQ Enable 10 = 0 Frequency 10 = 1kHz Q 10 = 4 Slope 10 = 6 Gain 10 = 0dB
    Type 10 = Parametric EQ Enable 11 = 0 Frequency 11 = 1kHz Q 11 = 4 Slope 11 = 6 Gain 11 = 0dB
    Type 11 = Parametric EQ Enable 12 = 0 Frequency 12 = 1kHz Q 12 = 4 Slope 12 = 6 Gain 12 = 0dB
    Type 12 = Parametric EQ


    Object(13.20.1): Ch1 Speaker Delay
    Coarse = 0s Fine = 0s Coarse Bypass = 0 Fine Bypass = 0


    Object(13.20.2): Ch2 Speaker Delay
    Coarse = 0s Fine = 270us Coarse Bypass = 0 Fine Bypass = 0

  2. #497
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    And the net results:

    Keep in mind that there is a single protection capacitor of undetermined value and a passive resistor network of undetermined attenuation between the D2430K and the amp. So 6 dB electronic filter coupled with 6 dB passive filter on the D2430K in the M2, just like a properly bi-amped 4430 or 4435.
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  3. #498
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    And the net results:

    Keep in mind that there is a single protection capacitor of undetermined value and a passive resistor network of undetermined attenuation between the D2430K and the amp. So 6 dB electronic filter coupled with 6 dB passive filter on the D2430K in the M2, just like a properly bi-amped 4430 or 4435.
    Hi 4313B,

    Many thanks for the data You have shown us.
    I would need some time to try to understand ( if EVER ) the presented data and the meaning of the attached tables.

    May be:

    http://www.musicdsp.org/files/Audio-EQ-Cookbook.txt

    would be used to get the real curve ????


    Regards
    Ivica

  4. #499
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    I tried to highlight the pertinent information in the tables in red but the "save" didn't take. I'll try something else.

    Channel 1 is the high pass and Channel 2 is the low pass.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by 4313B; 10-30-2013 at 09:02 AM. Reason: Changed table colors

  5. #500
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Boiled down:

    Very nicely done system.
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by 4313B; 10-30-2013 at 09:12 AM. Reason: Sorted by frequency and made larger

  6. #501
    Member sebackman's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    675
    Hi,
    It may be easier to read the parameters from 4313B with the a picture of the DSP design.

    Name:  M2 filter design.PNG
Views: 4310
Size:  33.0 KB

    Regards
    //RoB
    The solution to the problem changes the problem.
    -And always remember that all of your equipment was made by the lowest bidder

  7. #502
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    Boiled down: Very nicely done system.
    Hi 4313B,
    Thanks for the data You have sent, but it seems to me that room EQ is present there (is it ???), because when I have entered the data curve ( lowered 20dB) that I have got differed too much looking at the curve you have presented earlier.

    Regards Ivica
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  8. #503
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    the curve you have presented earlier
    What curve was that?

  9. #504
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    What curve was that?
    Hi 4313B,

    Ops, I have made an error while 'copying your data', but I thing the curve looked like yours now and I think it is correct.
    I have put the data ( Fo, Q, Gain, Slope...from your table) in series (14) of digital 'bi-quad' filters ( for EQ and shelf-ing) that would use such info in order to recalculate their responses, and the shown F/R response can be get.
    And added Hi-pass (Butter[1] where Fo=782Hz, 6dB/oct). In order to "simulate" unknown RC filter in-front of D2430K driver I have tried with Butter[1] filer too. On the presented attachment its Fo=700Hz (too).
    I am not sure whether on Your data room-compensation is applied or not. ???

    After 'inverting the filter responses', and removing Hi pass filters 782Hi Hi-pass, and (RC) 700Hz , I have got attached. So that would be D2430K & M2 horn response , is it ?????

    In order to compare previously presented D2 response
    [http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...&d=1358927209]
    in different (unknown) horn I have made a mixture of both.
    Interestingly that there are some very correlated behavior from over 1kHz. May more smoothing have been done wile compensating D2430K drivers responses in M2 box.
    Looking at the "inverted curve", the behavior of the D2 driver with M2 horn under 1kHz (either the driver or M2 Horn) is something that would make the places for any of them to be improved, I can guess, or would limit their usefulness in the region under 1kHz.

    Regards Ivica
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  10. #505
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    I am not sure whether on Your data room-compensation is applied or not. ???
    My assumption would be that the base configuration is anechoic.
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    So that would be D2430K & M2 horn response , is it ?????
    Looks reasonable to me but you might want to put it on a more common scale, maybe a 50 or 60 dB scale instead of 20 dB?
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    Looking at the "inverted curve", the behavior of the D2 driver with M2 horn under 1kHz (either the driver or M2 Horn) is something that would make the places for any of them to be improved, I can guess, or would limit their usefulness in the region under 1kHz
    I was quite surprised that they came up with the ~ 800 Hz crossover point for the D2430K. It worked out well though. I think a big part of it is how they shelved the 2216Nd. And we now know where that 2 dB efficiency hit came from compared with the S4700. 94 dB - 8 dB HP shelf + 6 dB baffle step = 92 dB

    I have had limited time to try this out on the Everest II components and the results have been very promising.

  11. #506
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    My assumption would be that the base configuration is anechoic.Looks reasonable to me but you might want to put it on a more common scale, maybe a 50 or 60 dB scale instead of 20 dB?

    .....I have had limited time to try this out on the Everest II components and the results have been very promising.........
    So on 60dB scale,
    but some time too large scale is only "good" for marketing purpose,
    I think for real technical "analyze" "smaller" scale is better.

    Here, I 'only' wonder if Q round 10 is good think for listening in any speaker compensation.

    I am sure that with DSP applied EQ on DD66000 would produce very linear F/R, as it is quite good with passive networks too.

    Regards
    Ivica
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  12. #507
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    So on 60dB scale,
    but some time too large scale is only "good" for marketing purpose,
    I think for real technical "analyze" "smaller" scale is better.

    Regards
    Ivica
    True, but most people are probably used to seeing the large scale plots.

  13. #508
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    True, but most people are probably used to seeing the large scale plots.
    Or, may be they prefer to see 'flat curves'

  14. #509
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2007
    Location
    wirral UK
    Posts
    667
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    I can not imagine that the real production cost for 476Be would be more expensive relative to D2430K. Yes, Beryllium or Magnesium diaphragm is may be more expensive (as raw material) but the phase plug for D2430K seems to me not so easy task to produce too. In any case I believe that for any of the mentioned drivers real production cost has marginal influence to the final 'market' price.
    Let us have a look what would be the price for Radian 951BePb about 1,100 U$D
    ( http://www.usspeaker.com/radian 951Bepb-1.htm )

    and the AH-forum member Guido comparison between 476Be and 951Be, the behavior "almost" the same.

    http://www.behringer-electric.de/fil... Radian950.pdf
    http://www.behringer-electric.de/fil...6 vs 476Be.pdf

    So it would be "interesting info' what would be D2430K price when (an IF) JBL decide to put on its price list.

    Regards
    Ivica
    After inverting Guido's curves, out of curiosity I took a screen grab of my own DSP eq curve(vert div=10dB) for my H9800clone/2452/Be combo- pretty close;


  15. #510
    Senior Member macaroonie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    near Glasgow Scotland
    Posts
    2,288
    Some of youze might be interested in this ad , D2's in Mexico

    http://articulo.mercadolibre.com.mx/...od-d2-430k-_JM

    $5500 mex ??? Not at all sure what that equates to in real or funny money.

    PS. Don't shoot the messenger.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 3 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 3 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. TAD MODEL-1 REFERENCE MONITOR
    By gerard in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-14-2014, 02:52 PM
  2. NAD Master Series
    By Domino in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-05-2008, 09:34 PM
  3. L100T/L100S as a reference/studio monitor
    By ldizac in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-16-2006, 10:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •