Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: CSI JBL

  1. #1
    Senior Member mbd7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    143

    CSI JBL

    Cone Scam Investigation (CSI)... the first clue... I got it on ebay.

    http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll...ME:B:WNA:US:12
    Last edited by mbd7; 09-12-2007 at 07:35 PM. Reason: syntax

  2. #2
    Senior Member mbd7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    143

    The Next Clue

    After peeling away all the urethane I felt like Jeraldo after he opened Al Capone’s secret passage... nothing there

    .
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. #3
    Senior Member mbd7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    143

    The third Clue

    Cryptic messages on the inside of the cone
    Attached Images Attached Images   

  4. #4
    Senior Member mbd7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    143

    Where'd you hide the body... I mean cone

    Just because it was in a C8R2121 Box doesn't make it legit! And you don't need to be a Certified Forensic Coneologist the figure that one out!
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Last edited by mbd7; 09-12-2007 at 07:29 PM. Reason: add'l info

  5. #5
    Senior Member mbd7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    143

    Crossbreeds have different DNA

    I bought this speaker as a back up so I can listen to my 4343's while I get the real 2121's reconed. I never thought I would see so many different speaker components slapped together! I'll let you know how it sounds in a few days.

  6. #6
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    I'm not getting this. What do you believe they are?

    [Or, are not?]

  7. #7
    RE: Member when? subwoof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    fingerlakes region, NY
    Posts
    1,899

    late to the game..

    That is the newer style 10" basket and the cone kit appears to be correct however the dome is not inverted and the trim ring is not installed. You would have to ask a JBL service center to see if the older, larger diameter inverted dome is still supplied.

    A box is a box is a box.The serial number does match the one on that little sticker though..:o)

    The 2121 has an inverted dome and was replaced by the ( suggested replacement + improved ) 2122H by the time the magnets became black and long before they had the new terminals.

    See Heather's 4341 thread for the pix I submitted of the entire 10" foam line examples.

    sub
    Last edited by subwoof; 09-13-2007 at 08:30 AM. Reason: to edit - what else?

  8. #8
    Moderator hjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NoVA - DC 'burbs
    Posts
    8,548
    Field Guide to the 10 Inch Woofers ... (see the first post for images & charts)

    http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...ad.php?t=16962
    2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
    7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    Quote Originally Posted by mbd7
    Just because it was in a C8R2121 Box doesn't make it legit! And you don't need to be a Certified Forensic Coneologist the figure that one out!
    - I think your speaker is a bona fide 2121H. It's just that it has been afixed with an outward facing 3" dustcap. ( I've been asked by my reconers whether I want an inverted or normal dustcap on a recent recone of a le10a ).

    The Reason ( for my belief ) ?
    - The serial numbers of your replacement cone kit are a perfect match ( between the serial number on the C8R2121Hs' shipping box & the sticker tag of the actual cone kit ) / according to pics you've included .
    - A flipped dustcap doesn't turn a 2121 into a 2122 .


    - The two models had different ranges of "healhy" DCR for their respective voice-coils ( back in the 1980s ), as well as different inductances ( Le ) for those coils .

    - I don't see how Dave, the seller of this speaker, has deceived you ( I think you're just a bit undereducated about these matters ) .
    - IMHO, It's quite unfortunate that you've chosen to include the "Scam" word from the get-go in this thread . You haven't been scammed from my perspective .

    - You got a good deal on your purchase ( IMO ) / whether it's a 2121 or a 2122.

  10. #10
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Looks OK to me except the dust cap looks like a 4". Could be just the photo though. You have 2121's so see if the dust cap is the correct diameter. If I remember correctly there was an issue with undersize dust caps or they were too deep and wouldn't go on inverted with the kit's. Something I read here somewhere. Maybe Edge will chime in or Giskard.

    Rob

  11. #11
    Senior Member mbd7's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    DFW, Texas
    Posts
    143

    No Problem w/ this deal

    I did all the research on this item before I bought it. I guess I could have used Cone Scene Investigation instead of Scam, but everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty in a court of law. I just thought that this speaker was more of a cross-breed than original. I've got a genuine C8R2121 that I got from Ken Pachkowsky and I compared these two and the dust caps are 4" on both of them. I guess they just got dyslectic when they installed it. A little MEK should do the trick to allow the dust cap to be correctly reinstalled. The only thing left to do after that is give it the listening test in the 4343 "Doghouse".
    Last edited by mbd7; 09-13-2007 at 05:12 PM. Reason: syntax

  12. #12
    RE: Member when? subwoof's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    fingerlakes region, NY
    Posts
    1,899

    if you can't make one, buy one.

    MANY other high-end manufacturers over the years have purchased JBL raw frame components and have modified them to their "specs"

    heath
    RCA
    Sunn
    Fender
    Peavey
    Meyer
    Community
    Westlake
    Tychobrae

    To name a only a FEW

    And while they may have added ferrofluid, changed spiders, used different paint, installed weird dustcaps or any other "improvement" it is and will still be a JBL component.

    That westlake thought that adding gobs of epoxy, removing the nameplate and using an OLD KIT in a NEW frame makes the "correct" speaker for their monitor does NOT mean it was a scam or fraud auction.

    It is the BUYERS responsibility to determine the items heritage and suitability for their usage and you owe the seller an apology. It was correctly posted and identified in all respects.

    sub

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. No high end JBL in audio stores here
    By scarpi in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 26
    Last Post: 04-03-2018, 02:19 PM
  2. The seeming demise of JBL OEM parts... and the subsequent devaluation of a brand?
    By GordonW in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 179
    Last Post: 08-10-2015, 10:22 AM
  3. JBL 2440 and JBL 2205J
    By Esoteric in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-17-2008, 12:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •