Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: iPod vs vinyl: Report from CES

  1. #1
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142

    iPod vs vinyl: Report from CES

    Following, is an article from yesterday's WSJ, reporting on an A/B comparison at CES. No surprise, but an interesting read.

    I would have loved to know how the comparison was between CD's with .wav files, and then SACD's...
    Attached Images Attached Images
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  2. #2
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    Re: iPod vs vinyl: Report from CES

    Or, as was explained to me by veteran audio designer Demian Martin: "Until you know it could be better, you don't
    know that it's bad."


    Isn't that the cold hard truth! Ignorance is bliss

    Thanks for the info Bo

    I look forward to the day when every tune I could possibly want to hear can reside on my computer system and I can punch in any playlist I want. They would have to sound better than vinyl and certainly better than CD's do today.

  3. #3
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Yes, I fell off the Eightfold Noble Path when I became addicted to audio. A very different yet sometimes also very rewarding path.

    That was a good article, Bo.

    A few years ago, I did a similar demo with a Tracy Chapman Album vs. CD for a room full of computer geeks that "knew" that CDs were "PERFECT SOUND FOREVER". Every one of them heard what was missing at 16 bits.

    If MP3, or MP4, or MP5... is going to rein over the masses, that is OK by me as long as Hi Res is also given a chance to share a small corner in the market place.

  4. #4
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142

    Re: Re: iPod vs vinyl: Report from CES

    Originally posted by Giskard
    I look forward to the day when every tune I could possibly want to hear can reside on my computer system and I can punch in any playlist I want. They would have to sound better than vinyl and certainly better than CD's do today.
    Yea, me too.

    My grab is the iPod comparison was doomed because of the MP3 compression (not a bad thing, mind you - and I'm quite fond of the 'Pod ingenuity but that was a dumb comparative start). Smarter woulda been full .wav files (uncompressed). Smarter still would be different D/A converters. Widget and I have gone 'round on this, and we are both convinced "better" (i.e., more expensive) D/A converters are quite audible.

    Finer and finer (and more affordable...) integration algorithms will come. So, as technology marches on to Moore's Law, you're sure to get your wish, Giskard!
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. CES Report
    By dennis j leisz in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 08-01-2009, 08:17 PM
  2. Vinyl vs. Digital
    By Regis in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 09-30-2004, 09:35 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •