Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Query on JBL Crossover Network

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Land of Sunshine
    Posts
    423

    Query on JBL Crossover Network

    Hi,

    I noticed in most of JBL XO, they connect capacitors, usually a larger value say 2 uF with another 0.01 uF in parallel. May I know is this the preferred way instead say just using a 2.2 uF? What is the purpose of the parallel circuit?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    RIP 2009
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rohnert Park, CA
    Posts
    3,785
    That's called "bypassing" the caps, but I'll let others more technically literate explain exactly what it does and why it's done.

    John

  3. #3
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    JBL Bypass Capacitors

    "It's a trick... get an axe..." - Ash

    They aren't required for anything. It was all a marketing ruse.

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    Hi ngccglp,

    - Read this thread for a pretty decent backgrounding on the subject ( or subjects ) .
    - I've found this "JBL" info is the type that "one can take to the bank" and is especially valuable to the DIYer .

    - I'm an active user of this approach ( bypassing "no-name" caps of all sorts ) .
    - As stated in the linked-to thread / film & foil polypropylene "bypass caps" will add extra defination ( only you can decide if you actually need it ) while a bit of polystyrene will add a touch of "spaciousness" in the UHF areas.
    - JBL has their own established ratios for the sizes to be used. They are; .01 uF for the Polypropylene type "bypass" and .005 uF for the Polystyrene cap ( when both are used with a base Mylar capacitor ).
    - I happen to use different sizes and different ratios with my bypass caps. This may be because I'm using metallized polypropylene caps as my basic cap type. As well, I figure that I'm after a more "diffuse" top-end compared to some others ( ie ; I happen to really like the "effect" of adding about .1 uF of lightly dc-biased polystyrene bypass into the mix ) . "Lightly" meaning about 2 volts DC .


    - Obviously, I also DC-Bias most caps ( though I'll exclude the oil soaked MPP types, ie; those metalized polypropylene "motor-run" types which don't seem to benefit much at all from the bias treatment ).

    - Now if ones' ears aren't up to the challenge of hearing the benefits or if ones' playback system can't pass along the extra resolution that comes by employing either of these two topologies / then / oh well / it'll be money mis-spent .


Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. New Equivalent 3145 crossover Network
    By Ian Mackenzie in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 10-15-2006, 05:46 AM
  2. Earliest JBL crossover with hi-frequency level control?
    By glen in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 10-13-2006, 01:58 AM
  3. Altec N501-8A Crossover Design Query
    By ngccglp in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 11-03-2005, 03:34 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •