MARCH 2004
APRIL 2004
MAY 2004



Help Support this Nonprofit Site by Clicking the Above Button

MARCH 2004

March 2004

MARCH 2004
APRIL 2004
MAY 2004



Sponsored by




Become a Donor
 to Project May








March 2 - TimG

Finally warm enough for glue to dry so fabrication can begin on the test enclosures. The first 2 cabinets are ready to go. These drivers require 3/4" recess for flush mounting so I had to laminate up 1.5" baffles. I will need to add weatherstrip to flush mount the 2234H's in these cabinets because the older 15" drivers only require 5/8" recess for flush mounting. First set of measurements will be done with 1500AL, and 2426H on a 16" x 6" biradial horn.

The test enclosure dimensions are: OD 15.75" x 18.5" x 32.5" ID 14.25" x 17" x 31" - (4) 31" x 1.5" x 3.5" vertical braces so 3.97 cu ft - driver volume no stuffing at this time Weather permitting, and with the help of a fellow speaker builder, I will start on 4 more stackable bass modules on Sunday. I am now thinking that I will try to target 5 cu ft boxes and reduce the volume if we need to rather than building even more boxes. .


March 3 - TimG

Budget horn proposal:

I'm thinking that some people may want to build a DIY project similar to the Project May, but will not be able to afford the original drivers or custom CNC machined wood horns (me for instance). As I build cabinets and measure the flagship drivers I will also be measuring other alternative drivers in the cabinets so that I will be able to propose an alternative design that will be more affordable to build.

My plan is to use drivers and horns that are similar enough that someone could start with affordable vintage drivers and then eventually upgrade to the full S9800 driver complement, or at least the less expensive diaphragm versions (2430, 045ti). I don't have access to a 1500FE, but that could be considered for an alternative woofer as well.

I will be measuring a 2226H and 2234H as alternative woofers. For midranges I will be measuring the 2426H on 2 horns that I have on hand. I will also be measuring a BMS 4590P, JBL 2450, and 2446, that a forum member will be sending me, on a 2380A horn.

I found another 1" throat horn and supertweeter that I would like to try, but I can't figure out how to get the faceplate off the supertweeter that I have. Here is the plan:

I want to get this dirt cheap piezo driver tear the horn off and then mount the driver from this combo behind the horn. I already have one of the FT17H drivers.

Here is a mid horn that appears very similar to the S9800 horn and we could add a JBL 1.5" to 1" adapter to allow use of the 2430/435Be as well.


March 4 - TimG

Beginning testing with cabinets below. Started off with 2426H, 2226H, and Sub1500. For stereo testing I have the following amplification available Adcom 555 (300 watts/4 ohms x 2) and 2535 (60 watts/8 ohms x 4). For mono testing both amps can be bridged for 800 watts/4 ohms x 1, 200 watts/8 ohms x 1, 60 watts/8 ohms x 2. Will hook up 1500AL next, now that I know everything is wired properly. The Sub1500 is shaking the concrete with only 300 watts, I'm eager to hear what 2 could do if I had a second 800 watt amp to drive it.



March 9 - TimG

The big project right now is putting the new boxes together. A friend and I cut up 5 sheets of MDF on Sunday and covered his entire driveway with dust. Good thing we had masks. I spent the afternoon on Monday routering out the 16 braces for the boxes.

The exterior dimensions are H 19" x W 21" x D 27.5" , Interior H 17.5" x W 19.5" x D 26". Each box has 4 vertical braces also made of 3/4" MDF with 50% of the area removed. Volume right now will be 4.84 cu ft before considering driver volume.

I also built a horn enclosure with dimensions H 13" x W 21" x D 26". This enclosure should function for the 2380 and Mr Widgets horn once it arrives.

Now I have to get some ports. If we tune to 27Hz this driver wants 2-4" ports or 1-6" port to keep wind noise down. Based on some rough calculations with a 108 liter box it looks like dual 4" ports would be 19.6" long. A 6" port appears to be too long to fit in the box without hitting the driver.

Once we subtract the port volume and driver motor volume these huge and heavy boxes are down to close to 4 cu ft.


March 18 - TimG

I now have T/S specs on multiple JBL drivers. I used SoundEasy with the Constant Current method. The setup consisted of the Delta 410 soundcard feeding the test signal to an Harmon Kardon 795i receiver. The output from the receiver to the speakers being tested was via 14ga Sound King cable around 6' long. The input to the sound card from the BESL test jig, and to the receiver from the sound card, was via 12' Radio Shack Gold Series RCA cables. The test jig used the 18" shielded RCA cable that was included with the BESL jig. The positive end of each RCA terminal was terminated with 47.5 Kohm resistor and Radio Shack soldered alligator clips. I used a Metex ME11 multimeter to measure impedance and to determine the actual impedance of my test resistor. The actual test resistor is a 400ohm, sand cast 10%, 5 watt resistor. I checked the impedance with a 400ohm, precision wire wound, .05%, 1/4 watt resistor.

Here are the TS specs for the first 1500AL that was measured. This driver was measured using the delta mass method using 100g of nickels for the added mass. The rest of the drivers will be measured tonight before break in and then all drivers will be broken in and then remeasured using both the delta mass and delta volume methods. The process for each driver takes only a few minutes, not counting time necessary to mount the drivers in the test box.

Re=5.3 ohms
Fs=30.52 Hz
Vas=208.99 L
Mms=143.71 g
BL=20.92 N/A
no=1.217 %
SPL=93.05 dB

Effective diameter was entered as 33.66 cm by including half of the surround on each side. If anyone has a better number for this parameter let me know.


March 19 - TimG

I took some quick measurements with my laptop system, but I can't post images from that computer. I'll be dragging my desktop system out to the garage on Sunday to take some real measurements with my SoundEasy system and microphone preamp. I will shoot some 1M response curves on and off axis for a single woofer, MTM, and TMM array using the 1500ALs mounted in 4 cu ft sealed boxes. I can carry all my other woofers around in one hand but these things are just freakin monsters. My other woofer, that would be my puppy, gets upset when I play with these things because I won't let her in the same room when these $750 drivers are lying on the floor. Would that be called woofer envy?

I really like my new measurement system and would recommend it. If you want to get a Delta 410 sound card, buy one now before all the vendors run out. The M-Audio Revolution 7.1 may work but I can't find anyone who has tested it out yet. The Firewire 410 should work for a nice portable system, but the reviews of this product are mixed. Apparently version 9.0 of Soundeasy is going to have an even more powerful measurement system built in. Here, again is the parts run down for those wishing to set up their own system:

PC Celeron 1700, Windows XP Pro, built by me
(SE 9.0 will require P4 2.66Ghz with 512 MB RAM)
SoundEasy 8.0 $210-225 now on sale at PartsExpress
M-Audio Delta 410 Soundcard $116
BESL microphone preamp $113
Radio Shack Gold Series RCA cables 12' $20 each
400ohm resistor $.25
Radio Shack alligator clips in a rainbow of colors
Metex ME11 digital multimeter, no longer available, but RadioShack offers an true RMS multimeter for $69.99 22-186
Kim Giardin calibrated Panasonic capsule microphone $35
You also need an old receiver or a fancy preamp and amplifer to provide a clean source of power for testing


March 21 - TimG

The new prototype cabinets are done except for the front baffles. They measure 21" wide x 19" high by 27.5" deep. I need to know if I can recess mount the woofers 1/4" from the edge or whether I need to leave more space for the horns to overlap the woofer cabinets. The frames of the 1500ALs are 3/4" deep and 15.25" in diameter. The front baffles are laminated 3/4" MDF and are 1.5" thick with a 14" hole in the inner layer and a 15.25 hole in the outer layer to allow the driver to be flush mounted.

I have cut wood for a horn frame that will have an open back and will accept multiple horn sizes by swapping the front plate. It is 13" high to accept what earlier dimensions said the prototype horn could be at its smallest.

If we end up using an TMM design, we may want to mount the supertweeter to the rear of the midhorn, just like on the S9800. Is it to late in the design stage to allow this type of option?

My first tests have used a JBL 2380 horn and a 6" x 16" biradial horn. I have just been resting these on top of the tower boxes. The final cabinets are going to be quite the shipment.


March 22 - Mr. Widget

The initial horn(s) will be something like the illustration below. They will require an 8" tall by 19(?)" wide space to sit. I would expect the final horns to have a lip of some sort to help incorporate them into the design. One possible scenario would be to have the UHF horn incorporated into that lip.

No it is not too late to consider the option of having a recessed UHF horn if the design ends up being TMM.



March 29 - TimG

Everything was looking so good on Thursday, I was thinking I would have measurements posted that night. If only it were so easy. The 4 cubic foot boxes were basically complete, except for front baffle mounting and binding post install, after just 2 Sundays with a helper. I spent the afternoon stopping at 4 stores (Home Depot, Lowes, Radio Shack, and Performance Audio) just to get the supplies I needed to wire up the 4 new boxes, secure the fronts, install t-nuts and remount the front baffles. Now that I have the drivers mounted I can barely lift these things. They have to be 100lb each at this point. On a positive note, they are really solid and don't have a lot of obvious resonance.

Finally I have some measurements we can look at. I'm continually amazed at how powerful SE is. My main computer, with the video capture program, fancy sound card, and SE is downstairs hooked up to the test rig, so I can't post the pictures until I bring it back upstairs. I need to get some more measurement done while everything is in place so I'm not willing to move it yet. What I will accomplish today is getting plots for the MTM off-axis. If I can I will also get plots for the TMM option, but all of this stuff is taking 4 times longer than I previously estimated because I'm doing it all by myself. Surprising, I got my wife to help me haul (4) 100lb cabinets across the yard, onto the porch, and down the stairs without screaming. Unfortunately I had to do 6 hours of yard work in return.

Things will start happening a lot more quickly now that everything is in place. I say we worry about box tuning after we decide on the design format. I will post the plots as soon as I can. Plan on seeing some tonight.

Here are some things I learned:

1) It would be nice to have an indexed volume control on my test receiver so that I could replicate volume levels on different days.
2) Don't try to use a fancy surround sound preamp for testing, it's to much of a PTA to turn off all the features you don't need.
3) Use lots of masking tape to mark the position of your microphone stand on the carpet so you can remember where it was before you had to move it to do the close-miked woofer response.
4) Heavy things move a lot faster when you have 2 people to do it. (I had to take Soma last night, and luckily my back felt undamaged this morning.)
5) Always buy more wire than the amount you were certain would be more than enough.
6) Next time invest in a computer power supply with an ultraquiet fan if you plan on using it for testing, the mic picks up everything
7) 1 watt in a large format compression driver is lots.



March 29 -

OK, I have the MTM plots. I'm not going to do TMM plots tonight because once I take the MTM apart I'm not lifting that top box 50" off the ground again without help or a hoist. I wish they would have used Neodymium on the motors for these beasts I have on axis, 15 and 30 vertical. I will do the same for horizontal, but MTMs don't suffer comb filtering in the horizontal plane. These plots were taken to confirm the model so I don't think there is a need at this time to do plots every 5 degrees.

There are limitations to these plots because I don't currently have access to an auditorium. I'm limited to far field measurements above about 350Hz. These plots do not include near field response because I'm not sure what 15 degrees off axis looks like when the mic is almost touching the dust cap. Basically adding the near field would raise the level of each of the plots by the same amount.

The procedure for getting the complete far field picture is as follows. Measure far field, move mic adjacent to dust cap, lower output level and measure near field, add baffle gain to nearfield plot, adjust level of near field to far field at 500Hz, merge near field to far field at 500Hz.

To obtain accurate far field response to a lower frequency I would need to move the speakers and measurement system to a larger room. Since my garage is only a 1 car, that won't really help. If I had a crane in my back yard, and it was totally silent outside, I could measure the speakers in my back yard, but neither of those conditions can be met. If I am able to reserve the University Social Science Auditorium in May, for the DIY event, I will be able to take accurate measurements to a lower level, but I'm hoping to have estimates for the crossovers before then, so it would just be for confiratory purposes.

The procedures I am using for measurement were obtained from Joe D'Apollitos book, the SoundEasy manual, the LspCAD manual and the SoundEasy user guide, which is an invaluable time saving resource written by John K.

The image of the setup in my next post shows the woofer cabinets, 4 cu ft internal, with 19" x 21" baffles. The drivers are 1500AL with a reversed cabinet serving as a stand at the bottom. The cabinets are separated by a 8.25" high stack of MDF round cutouts and the horn is a DDS 1" throat 70 by 40 degree horn that I'm borrowing to test a new compression driver. It looks like it would make a great horn for a 12" or 10" midrange crossed over at 1000-1300Hz. I have not yet had a chance to complete the horn baffle/spacer that will house the H9800 horn.



March 31 -

What are those curves telling us??

The curves show some of the comb filtering effects that occur with an MTM with large woofers and a wide center-to-center distance. I previously modeled the comb filtering effects in another program and posted the results. I will do that modeling again now that I have more information about baffle size and correct piston diameter so that we can compare the predicted to the measured results. Unfortunately, I can model more of the comb filtering effect than I can measure. However, the software predictions match reality very closely and are based on vector modeling. Therefore, I feel we can trust the predicted results because they will correspond to the actual results. That is not to say that the final crossovers will not be tweaked by ear.

I have measured TS parameters of the woofers, and I will conduct on an off-axis measures of the 1500ALs in both a MTM and TMM format so that we can decide on the advantages and disadvantages of each design before moving on with the design process.

I have another microphone that I can use, but I don't have a calibration file for it. My Panasonic capsule mic is the same device used in the Mitey Mike. The reference speaker is a good idea. I will shoot some measurements of my reference speaker today. My current reference is a 4-way based on the NHT 3.3. The 3.3 is no longer in production but it is a 4-way based on a 12", 6.5", 4", and 1" dome tweeter. Kind of like a sealed L250ti. Here is a link to a review of its little brother the 2.9.


A friend is also planning to bring over his Focal W-cone version of the Joe D' designed Aria 7 MTM tonight. Here is a link to what they look like. We can measure these too.


An RTA measurement in this room would be totally colored by room reflections. Gated response measurements are used so room reflections do not contaminate the measurements. In a sense, gated measurements, merged with close mic woofer measurements simulate measurements under anechoic conditions. I can take an ungated measurement of the speaker, but I'm not sure what value it would have. We certainly don't want to design the crossover based on measurements that include room reflections from my small room. However, this issue merits more discussion. Here are just some of the issues involved that we should discuss.

1) You can design the speaker to measure flat at one point in the room, on the listening axis, or use EQ to achieve the same result. However it may sound terrible at every other point in the room, and will not be accurate in any other room.

2) On the other hand, you can design the speaker to have flat frequency and power response under simulated anechoic conditions and then treat your listening room to achieve good response at the listening position, with small tweaks to the crossover as necessary, (i.e., for high frequency rolloff contouring or a BBC dip). This type of speaker has the potential to sound excellent in all rooms, with some work.

I would lean towards the second design philosophy, with the provision for EQ in the bass frequencies (say below 100Hz) since this is the area of response most affected by the room. This is the same design philosophy used in the JBL LSR6300 studio monitor series, and the Infinity Prelude speaker before that. I personally feel that this is the best way to produce a SOTA speaker, and it is also the future of accurate audio reproduction. However, this philosophy would likely involve having to mount the subwoofer separate from the main speakers to produce the best wide range response, not always the most decor or space friendly solution.

Please refer to the white papers located here, particularly the "RABOS" and "Loudspeakers and Rooms" technical papers:


and here


A similar philoosphy is used in the new B&O BeoLab5


The reference axis of this speaker is at 42.125" from the floor. The horn shown in the picture will have nothing to do with the final design, was not hooked up, and is just be used for my own evaluation purposes. I have used the cabinets I have available to try to get the axis at the midpoint of my rooms vertical height to allow for the longest time of flight to the mic before floor or ceiling bounce enters the picture.

Mr. Widget originally estimated that the closest we would be able to get the woofer center-to-center distance was 28.25 inches. Others mentioned an MTM with 36 inch center-to-center spacing, but I think the simulations have already demonstrated that we want to get the woofers as close together as possible for an MTM. I have been recently informed that the mid horn will have to be at least 8" high, but I have not received word yet on how much vertical space the supertweeter will consume.
I don't think I know Don's seated ear height. If I did, I have forgotten it. I would shoot for a mid horn height of around 39-42" depending on the final design. This height can always be adjusted by adding provisions for tilt and level on the final industrial design cabinets.