Page 97 of 113 FirstFirst ... 47879596979899107 ... LastLast
Results 1,441 to 1,455 of 1683

Thread: JBL Master Reference Monitor

  1. #1441
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    It's the pipe organ effect

    Careful placement and minimising turbulence around the openings will minimise this.

    I have seen simulation where 5mm change in placement can have a significant impact.

  2. #1442
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Hi Ian,

    Do recall if there was a particular nearby "feature" that was the subject of the simulation?
    e.g., cabinet edge, floor, driver, adjacent port, adjacent "wall" (close enough approaching slot loading)
    whether part of the cabinet system or not,... Just curious, as "significant" can mean functional (audible)
    or/and measurable. I can imagine this port placement sensitivity being quite system specific.

  3. #1443
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    wisconsin
    Posts
    2

    jbl m2 horn lens

    hi
    following this thread for a while now and have finally decided to take the plunge.
    i will receive a pair of jbl D2430k drivers and am looking for a pair of M2 horn lenses and adapters.
    could anybody point me to where i can get them aside from speakerex ?
    any help is appreciated.
    malcolm

    edit: i just realized that i should have probably posted this in the m2 diy thread .

  4. #1444
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Iceland
    Posts
    140
    Nearfield measurements of my clones with original EQ settings. DSP is Hypex DLCP

    No smoothing. Dont like that peak at 254hz...

    Name:  2216nearfield.jpg
Views: 1557
Size:  85.4 KB

  5. #1445
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Iceland
    Posts
    140

    M2 crossover slope

    We had some discussions earlier regarding the acoustic crossover in M2. Electrical, 2216nd is crossed over with 36dB/oct LR. I added a target curve showing 8th order LR (48dB/oct) in REW, and it seems to match pretty good...

    Name:  M2crossoverslope.jpg
Views: 1574
Size:  86.8 KB

  6. #1446
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Iceland
    Posts
    140
    Without EQ at the "trouble area"

    Name:  M2modifiedEQ.jpg
Views: 1580
Size:  99.0 KB

  7. #1447
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Your dips/peaks around 250hz look similar to Scott's ones.

  8. #1448
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Iceland
    Posts
    140
    The peak dissapears in far field measurement, but the dip is still there. Overall response looks good, but indoor measurements are hard to rely on.

  9. #1449
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Quote Originally Posted by johanwholst View Post
    We had some discussions earlier regarding the acoustic crossover in M2. Electrical, 2216nd is crossed over with 36dB/oct LR. I added a target curve showing 8th order LR (48dB/oct) in REW, and it seems to match pretty good...
    According to all my measurements the target is a LR 36dB/oct a bit under 800Hz, both for phase and amplitude.

  10. #1450
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Each driver measured on axis, ~1m distance.
    That is a pretty well-matched LR 36dB/oct at 750Hz.

    Name:  M2 low.jpg
Views: 1547
Size:  87.6 KB

    Name:  M2 high.jpg
Views: 1629
Size:  87.4 KB

  11. #1451
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2014
    Location
    Iceland
    Posts
    140
    No doubt! Thanks for the confirmation...

  12. #1452
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2016
    Location
    United States
    Posts
    16
    Hi Pos,

    I noticed that every time I take a spatial average of my M2s in a room (6 positions, 1m square, ~3m measurement distance) I find a peak centered at around 8.1 kHz.

    Name:  M2REW.jpg
Views: 1451
Size:  49.5 KB
    Name:  M2ARCLF.jpg
Views: 1397
Size:  127.9 KBName:  M2ARCRF.jpg
Views: 1449
Size:  130.8 KBName:  M2ARCC.jpg
Views: 1346
Size:  129.2 KB

    A few people on another forum have suggested that the openDRC-AN with rephase may not behave 100% predictably. Do you think there could be something strange going on with the high end?

  13. #1453
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Hi Synthetic

    There can be minor differences up top, partially because of the different DACs and amplifiers, but also due to the IIR implementation in the Crown/BSS (Qs are never fully correct up high with biquads).
    But I think that 8kHz thing is as least partially intended: http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...ht=#post391305

    The strange thing to me, that I also measure and see in most "real world" Crown-powered M2 measurements, is the 6.5kHz dip...

    That would be great if someone with the BSS unit could measure the outputs of the processor with the M2 preset engaged.

  14. #1454
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Here is a set of measurements of the M2 in different medium to large rooms, from FLoyd Tool's presentation (go to 1:11:40), that clearly show the same phenomenon:
    Name:  in room 24 to 516 seats.jpg
Views: 1471
Size:  46.8 KB

  15. #1455
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Detroit
    Posts
    391
    Quote Originally Posted by pos View Post
    Hi Synthetic

    There can be minor differences up top, partially because of the different DACs and amplifiers, but also due to the IIR implementation in the Crown/BSS (Qs are never fully correct up high with biquads).
    But I think that 8kHz thing is as least partially intended: http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...ht=#post391305

    The strange thing to me, that I also measure and see in most "real world" Crown-powered M2 measurements, is the 6.5kHz dip...

    That would be great if someone with the BSS unit could measure the outputs of the processor with the M2 preset engaged.
    What I see is a gradual "sag" from 3 - 8K. 3 and 8K are actually where they should be. As you indicate above, there's a lot going on with all that gear, data acquisition. A "witch hunt."

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. TAD MODEL-1 REFERENCE MONITOR
    By gerard in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 30
    Last Post: 11-14-2014, 02:52 PM
  2. NAD Master Series
    By Domino in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 08-05-2008, 09:34 PM
  3. L100T/L100S as a reference/studio monitor
    By ldizac in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 07-16-2006, 10:28 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •