Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 30 of 30

Thread: Sony to spin off audio unit

  1. #16
    Senior Member 4343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SJ, CA
    Posts
    517

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Ducatista47 View Post
    ... Two of the bits are what keep the errors to zero. They don't have the same function as the other bits. Philips, lacking the Japanese insistence on doing everything perfectly, only wanted good enough. Fourteen would have either meant errors or lower audio quality. ...
    14 bits would have meant lesser audio quality, yes. Otherwise, the 2 extra bits are exactly the same as the first 14, Audio Data. The error correction system actually comprises 66% of the data on a CD! (588 bits to encode every 192 audio bits.)

    It's called Cyclic Redundancy Correction Coding, or CRCC, sometimes Cyclic Redundancy Check Code, or just CRC, as in CRC Errors when talking about a bad disk.

    First the 16 bit words are split into into frames, containing twelve 16 bit samples each (six left and six right samples), for a total of 192 bits of audio data per frame. The error correction then adds 64 bits of parity data to each frame. Then, 8 bits of subcode is added for ease in locating the frames. (At this point my Sony training Instructor diverged from the Wikipedia page by saying that the entire process was applied again to the resulting data stream, which he explained was the Cyclic part of Cyclic Redundancy Correction Coding.) All of these 33-byte frames (called "channel-data" frames) get their order scrambled and run through EFM before getting encoded as pits on the disc. The order is mixed up so that scratches don't destroy consecutive audio bits.

    EFM means Eight to Fourteen Modulation, which is exactly what it sounds like, an 8-bit word is mapped to a 14-bit word in order to remove as many 1-to-0 or 0-to-1 transitions as possible, basically an LPF for the data. They did that to make the pits on the disk larger and easier to read. A Sony engineer explained that the way they designed EFM in the pre-computer days was by having a room full of women look through lists of 14-bit words to find the ones with the most 1's or 0's strung together, such as 00000001111111, or 11110000011111. The list that they made was then mapped into a lookup table ROM so that they had a unique 14 bit word for every possible 8-bit word.
    Mike Scott in SJ, CA
    Drive 'em to the Xmax!

  2. #17
    Senior Member Ducatista47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Peoria, Illinois
    Posts
    1,886
    I don't know what the industry thinks, but it seems to me that Sony is pretty sharp in the software realm. Thank you so much for the correction and for extending my knowledge of this development.

    Some people feel Philips did the heavy lifting in the CD development, but I am not so sure. This is impressive work.

    All of these 33-byte frames (called "channel-data" frames) get their order scrambled and run through EFM before getting encoded as pits on the disc. The order is mixed up so that scratches don't destroy consecutive audio bits.
    I have read a layman's description of the interleaving on the disc. It said the data is laid down out of chronological order so a big surface defect, like a scratch, "would scatter the "bad" data among different sections of "good" data, making it much easier to figure out what was missing." Is that a fair description of what is going on?
    Information is not Knowledge; Knowledge is not Wisdom
    Too many audiophiles listen with their eyes instead of their ears


  3. #18
    Senior Member 1audiohack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    3,095
    Hi Clark;

    I wasn't at all saying that your statement was BS or that it is something you should back up or retract. I am very interested in the where, when and who in audio and science in general and just wanted to explore your lead, nothing else.

    My best,
    Barry.
    If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.

  4. #19
    Senior Member Ducatista47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Peoria, Illinois
    Posts
    1,886
    Quote Originally Posted by 1audiohack View Post
    Hi Clark;

    I wasn't at all saying that your statement was BS or that it is something you should back up or retract. I am very interested in the where, when and who in audio and science in general and just wanted to explore your lead, nothing else.

    My best,
    Barry.
    Believe me, with my geriatric brain it could well be high in BS content! I have to rely on my memory. Only ill advised individuals would join me in that. Besides, I want to retract anything supposedly objective that I can't prove. I hope you found the patents interesting. Did you see the "Objects and Summary of the Invention" in the Sony patent PDF? Sounds like the earlier designs from other parties had a few fatal design flaws.
    Information is not Knowledge; Knowledge is not Wisdom
    Too many audiophiles listen with their eyes instead of their ears


  5. #20
    Senior Member 4343's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    SJ, CA
    Posts
    517

    Cool

    Quote Originally Posted by Ducatista47 View Post
    I don't know what the industry thinks, but it seems to me that Sony is pretty sharp in the software realm. Thank you so much for extending my knowledge of this development.

    Some people feel Philips did the heavy lifting in the CD development, but I am not so sure. This is impressive work.



    I have read a layman's description of the interleaving on the disc. It said the data is laid down out of chronological order so a big surface defect, like a scratch, "would scatter the "bad" data among different sections of "good" data, making it much easier to figure out what was missing." Is that a fair description of what is going on?
    That's it exactly.

    One of the reel-to-reel DASH digital tape formats actually recorded two separate tracks of the same data, with the interleaving done in reverse on the second one. That allowed for tape splicing for those dinosaurs that couldn't get the hang of the digital editor. There was enough data in front of the splice that belonged _after_ the splice (and vice-versa) that the machine could do a quick cross-fade of the data, I think it was around 15mS or so.

    Software is creative work, and a lot of the creative types in Sony went to the Audio division. Video software was notoriously _not_ as good. They made one VCR with what we called "The Y99 2K bug" back in '98. 2K was the model and it could not accept dates in the range 1-1-1999 to 12-31-1999. Seems they HAD made 2000 work, but had somehow muffed '99...
    Mike Scott in SJ, CA
    Drive 'em to the Xmax!

  6. #21
    Senior Member Ducatista47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Peoria, Illinois
    Posts
    1,886

    I missed this one. Does this do what I think it does?

    A click on the title will display the entire patent.

    Method and apparatus for adding 1/f fluctuation to an audio signal



    Patent number: 6344940
    Abstract: The present invention provides a digital signal reproduction apparatus and a digital signal reproduction method which employs fluctuation in a sampling or quantization process, so as to eliminate lack of depth feeling in digital data, increasing the pleasantness. In a case when a switch 19 is OFF and a switching circuit 20 is set to at terminal b, a clock generator 17 generates a master clock MCK having a 1/f fluctuation according to a signal generated by a fluctuation function generating circuit 18. This master clock MCK is supplied to a D/A converter 13, an aperture circuit 14, and a low pass filter 15. The D/A converter 13 converts a digital signal into an analog signal having an amplitude A with an amplitude fluctuation &Dgr;A (A±&Dgr;A). Thus, the D/A converter 13 is capable of adding a 1/f fluctuation in the amplitude direction (power axis direction) of the analog signal.
    Type: Grant
    Filed: November 28, 1997
    Issued: February 5, 2002
    Assignee: Sony Corporation
    Inventors: Yoichiro Sako, Heitaro Nakajima
    Information is not Knowledge; Knowledge is not Wisdom
    Too many audiophiles listen with their eyes instead of their ears


  7. #22
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,755
    Quote Originally Posted by Ducatista47 View Post
    Patent number: 6344940
    Abstract: The present invention provides a digital signal reproduction apparatus and a digital signal reproduction method which employs fluctuation in a sampling or quantization process, so as to eliminate lack of depth feeling in digital data, increasing the pleasantness.
    Since they've held the patent for over 14-years, the question might be "have they used it".

    Leading to more debates about if it's more "real" then reality.

    Sounds like Kodachrome for music.
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  8. #23
    Senior Member tomt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    calabasas ca
    Posts
    372
    Quote Originally Posted by SEAWOLF97 View Post

    IMHO ..sony's beta was superior to vhs when they competed.
    maybe sony should have mentioned,

    that beta was the standard for tv stations,

    for much of these united states.

  9. #24
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,755
    Quote Originally Posted by tomt View Post
    maybe sony should have mentioned, that beta was the standard for tv stations, for much of these united states.

    Maybe Beta S, but not the consumer version. Big difference, including the size of the tape itself and the cassette. The Pro version had several different versions, SP etc., and most referred to the pro-version as Betacam versus the consumer Betamax.

    Not that the Betamax wasn't superior to VHS. I had both a Sony and Sanyo beta VCRs and still have plenty of tapes from them, for whatever good that'll do me!

    Seawolf, if you've not already reached your Minidisc limit, I could pick these up for you: http://charlottesville.craigslist.or...902094972.html
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  10. #25
    Senior Member Hoerninger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,892
    Sony was a great competitor in those days. I remember "SONY U-Matic" including some experience (educational tapes).
    According to Wikipedia
    "Betamax ... similar to the earlier, professional .75 in (19 mm) wide, U-matic format. The format is virtually obsolete, having lost the videotape format war though an updated variant of the format, Betacam, is still used by the television industry."
    ___________
    Peter

  11. #26
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWCCA View Post
    Seawolf, if you've not already reached your Minidisc limit, I could pick these up for you: http://charlottesville.craigslist.or...902094972.html
    Quote Originally Posted by Hoerninger View Post
    videotape format war though an updated variant of the format, Betacam, is still used by the television industry."
    ___________
    Peter
    thats a fine deal Phil, tho the 330 is the lowest of the consumer models. also a cheap way to prove SW is full of BS

    I bought 5.5 cases (550 disks) of Premium Gold Sony 80 minute disks SEALED/NEW a couple of months back and now have so many that some are going to CL. Buyers are happy to get them since they are N/A in NA ,unless you want to get them shipped from HongKong. The re-record cycle is estimated by Sony at 100,000 per disk.

    Peter , at times I used my S-BetaMax for recording just audio. Great results*, but not very portable .

    *because of the interlacing of (est) 80 degree tracks, it gave a virtual tape speed of 120 ips. (AFAIR)
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  12. #27
    Senior Member Ducatista47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Peoria, Illinois
    Posts
    1,886

    Clarification of Sony's Plans

    Here is a more in depth feature about the plans Sony has for the near future. As of now the "video and sound" unit(s) will be wholly owned by Sony. From this text it is not clear whether the sound unit is audio products; video is not the TV unit. This text is from a page no longer available directly; I found it through a search link. Sorry for the probably illegal copy & paste.


    By Eric Pfanner

    TOKYO-- Sony Corp. Chief Executive Kazuo Hirai's comeback plan, dubbed One Sony, is starting to look more like Several Sonys.
    The Japanese electronics and entertainment company said Wednesday that it would spin off its video and sound segment into a separate wholly owned subsidiary, following a similar move last year for its long-troubled television business. The goal is to get them more focused on profits while the Sony parent looks for growth in businesses such as movies, music, videogames and image sensors, said Mr. Hirai.

    After years of losses, Sony now aims to lift operating profit to Yen500 billion ($4.2 billion) in three years. It expects to eke out an operating profit in the year ending in March, with the TV business turning to the black for the first time in a decade.

    Mr. Hirai said Wednesday that he envisioned spinoffs of other units. He also said the company would consider a sale of the TV unit or the company's struggling smartphone business, though he said nothing was currently in the works.

    "I think we have to keep those possibilities in mind," he said.
    Mr. Hirai said making units more autonomous would spur managers to focus on profitability and make it easier to pursue business alliances.

    Under the new structure, "each business unit will be more flexible and speedy in making business decisions and will be asked to be more responsible for what they do," said Atsushi Osanai, an associate professor at Waseda Business School in Tokyo who used to work at Sony. "A challenge for Mr. Hirai is to make sure these spun-off segments remain coherent as one Sony group."
    Mr. Hirai introduced the slogan One Sony in 2012 as a way to draw together the company's disparate holdings, which range from electronics to entertainment to financial services. A year later Mr. Hirai rebuffed a proposal by the New York hedge fund Third Point LLC for a partial spinoff of Sony's entertainment businesses, which the firm said would unlock value that was obscured by the travails of Sony's electronics arm.

    Mr. Hirai said Wednesday that Sony wasn't giving up on the One Sony approach. Under the new structure, Mr. Hirai, "there will be a good balance between centrifugal and centripetal forces."
    Sony has sharpened its focus on profitability since Mr. Hirai named a new chief financial officer, Kenichiro Yoshida, last year. While Sony expects to post a net loss for the year ending March 31, it recently upgraded the outlook for its operating results, forecasting a profit of Yen20 billion instead of a loss of Yen40 billion. Since Mr. Yoshida took his job last April, Sony shares have risen 58%.
    The company has spun off its personal-computer unit and recently said it would pull the plug on its in-house music streaming business. In its place, Spotify AB will provide digital music for Sony devices.

    Mr. Hirai, in a briefing on the company's midterm strategy, focused more on profitability goals than grand visions of Sony's future. The company, he said, wants to achieve a 10% return on equity, a broad measure of profitability, up from minus 7.4% for the year ending March 31.
    Rather than pursuing sales volume, Mr. Hirai said, Sony will focus on growth in profitable areas such as the PlayStation game business and the image sensor unit, which makes cameras for Apple Inc. and other smartphone providers. It sees growing demand for the sensors in cars because of the spread of autonomous driving technology.

    Sony also sees its music division and its movie unit as growth drivers, even though the latter is still recovering from a cyberattack. Mr. Hirai said the company would consider acquisitions of entertainment assets in places such as India.

    In addition to a split-off of the video and sound units, which Sony said would take place by Oct. 1, the company said it was organizing its businesses into three categories according to their growth prospects, with content, games and image sensors at the top and smartphones and TVs at the bottom.

    The hierarchical arrangement is a "good step," said Yasuo Nakane, an analyst at Deutsche Bank, "though the question would be how much it will actually spend on image sensors and PlayStation, and how much it will not invest in smartphones and TVs to make sure they will be profitable."

    Megumi Fujikawa contributed to this article.

    Write to Eric Pfanner at [email protected] and Takashi Mochizuki at [email protected]

    Information is not Knowledge; Knowledge is not Wisdom
    Too many audiophiles listen with their eyes instead of their ears


  13. #28
    Senior Member Hoerninger's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    1,892
    Quote Originally Posted by Ducatista47 View Post
    I found it through a search link. Sorry for the probably illegal copy & paste.
    Thank you for sharing.
    You are unblameable , Google showed the way using the first paragraph.
    ____________
    Peter

  14. #29
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    722

    Post

    Sony has put out some good stuff, and some real crap over the years. It varies with them just like any of the other mass market corps.
    S4700 owner.

  15. #30
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    722
    Quote Originally Posted by fpitas View Post
    I'm glad there are guys like Mr. Pass that still make boutique electronics.

    Francis
    Agreed 100 percent.
    S4700 owner.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. How consistent are JBLs unit-to-unit?
    By riker1384 in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 10-28-2010, 07:05 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •