Results 1 to 9 of 9

Thread: 2231As - whats wrong here?

  1. #1
    Senior Member Fangio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    789

    2231As - whats wrong here?

    Someone offered me a pair of these, looking both the same, for 300. OMG

    He says they could be refoamed correctly, but my guess is they were reconed just wrong, and need another reconing. They look kind of 'hybrid 2231/2225 frankenwoofers', and applying new foam surrounds to those would offer a good chance of damaging the cones final during this dubious attempt. And who knows if the cones/spiders etc. are really 2231.. your thoughts please, are they to rescue? And what's their actual worth in current condition?

    I'm thinking about offering max. 150 for the baskets. Thanks for enlightening me.

    And oh, maybe its me who is wrong, and some1 could have had a conceivable reason to do that?
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  2. #2
    Senior Member JuniorJBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,723
    Most likely the right cone but Definitely the wrong surround.
    Always fun learning more.......

  3. #3
    Senior Member edgewound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,776
    I suppose they could be salvaged, but they have been raped with the wrong surround. The cone assembly looks to be correct, but to be honest I'd just recone them and be done with it. Retro fitting a foam surround back to it will be a little messy for picky types like me, but maybe you could live with it?

    Baskets are worth 'bout $50 bucks each US max. It has been discussed here alot lately that while the alnico motors are more romantic, the SFG Ferrite motors are actually better performers, and rarely need a recharge...of course there is the 'correctness' issue with a collectable, but I think alnico baskets are overpriced. I'd rather carry alnico in my guitar amp though , mainly because it weights about 10 pounds less.

    On the other hand....correctness aside....maybe these will work for you for a while....they might sound "okay" :dont-know

    Oh....your offer sounds reasonable.
    Edgewound...JBL Pro Authorized...since 1988
    Upland Loudspeaker Service, Upland, CA

  4. #4
    Senior Member Fangio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    789
    Quote Originally Posted by edgewound
    I suppose they could be salvaged, but they have been raped with the wrong surround. The cone assembly looks to be correct, but to be honest I'd just recone them and be done with it. Retro fitting a foam surround back to it will be a little messy for picky types like me, but maybe you could live with it?
    Thank you, edgewound.
    You're a reconer, right? And a great one I assume, you would just need the kit for 150$/ea? But I will have to pay for the time also, and removing/replacing wrong surrounds will take the same, or even more time than a standard reconing - correct? So it won't be worth it (for me).
    Quote Originally Posted by edgewound
    Baskets are worth 'bout $50 bucks each US max. It has been discussed here alot lately that while the alnico motors are more romantic, the SFG Ferrite motors are actually better performers, and rarely need a recharge... of course there is the 'correctness' issue with a collectable, but I think alnico baskets are overpriced.
    Learned that here too, and agree, especially to the overprized point. Romantic is a great word for alnico magnets OTOH there are reasons for me to buy drivers with alnico motors for a project, I'm kind of forced to.. will explain that another time, anyway this is a chance to get them not overpriced. More interesting here: is there such a thing like a '2235A' cone kit for these? Thought there are only 2235H woofers..?
    Quote Originally Posted by edgewound
    On the other hand....correctness aside....maybe these will work for you for a while....they might sound "okay" :dont-know
    A shift to less deep bass, more mid bass, i'd think. And it could sound okay in a custom application, but not correct and just somehow in a restoration project with given specs..
    Quote Originally Posted by edgewound
    your offer sounds reasonable.
    Hope so. He started with 400 and didn't find buyers, I was the only one who discussed the wrong surrounds with the seller.
    Last edited by Fangio; 03-09-2006 at 12:31 PM. Reason: outdated fact

  5. #5
    Senior Member edgewound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,776
    Quote Originally Posted by Fangio
    Thank you, edgewound.
    You're a reconer, right? And a great one I assume, you would just need the kit for 150$/ea? But I will have to pay for the time also, and removing/replacing wrong surrounds will take the same, or even more time than a standard reconing - correct? So it won't be worth it (for me).
    Learned that here too, and agree, especially to the overprized point. Romantic is a great word for alnico magnets OTOH there are reasons for me to buy drivers with alnico motors for a project, I'm kind of forced to.. will explain that another time. More interesting here: is there such a thing like a '2235A' cone kit for these? Thought there are only 2235H woofers..?
    A shift to less deep bass, more mid bass, i'd think. And it could sound okay in a custom application, but not correct and just somehow in a restoration project with given specs..
    Hope so. He started with 400 and didn't find buyers, I was the only one who discussed the wrong surrounds with the seller. And now I have an exclusive offer.
    Hi Fangio...

    The recone kit for the 2231A is C8R2235. The current US price for parts and labor is $174.00ea.

    Sounds like you have a good handle on things.

    Yeah...I'm a pretty good reconer ...Thank you
    Here's one I did in January 2006. 136A from a pristine pair of L300's. I originally did it for the customer in 1991....he came back
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    Edgewound...JBL Pro Authorized...since 1988
    Upland Loudspeaker Service, Upland, CA

  6. #6
    Senior Member Fangio's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2005
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    789
    some1 could have had a conceivable reason to do that?
    Talked to a local reconer now who's familiar with JBL, and he said that isn't that unusual as assumed.

    This kind of modification may have been the choice of a customer, who preferred the characteristics of that 'stiffer' surrounds. In fact he has done that himself some times before, on request of customers who valued 'correctness' not as high as a certain and welcomed effect on bass reproduction.

    So there is no right/wrong thing but possibly a personal preference is responsible.. maybe that choice was even available from the factory?

  7. #7
    Senior Member JuniorJBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,723
    Quote Originally Posted by Fangio
    maybe that choice was even available from the factory?


    Maybe you would buy a different woofer like a 2225 or "D", "E" series
    Always fun learning more.......

  8. #8
    Senior Member edgewound's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Southern California
    Posts
    2,776
    Quote Originally Posted by Fangio
    So there is no right/wrong thing but possibly a personal preference is responsible.. maybe that choice was even available from the factory?
    I doubt it...but I guess anything is possible. The only other 15" with a cloth surround from that era would have been the LE15B/2216 in the L200, and those kits aren't interchangeable with 136A, 2231 et.al. etc.
    Edgewound...JBL Pro Authorized...since 1988
    Upland Loudspeaker Service, Upland, CA

  9. #9
    Senior Member GordonW's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Marietta/Moultrie GA USA
    Posts
    1,455
    Looks like it could possibly be a K140 or 2205A kit. Of those two, I'd bet K140, due to the "triple roll" fabric surround. IIRC, 2205s had something more like an "M-roll" edge, with only two "rolls"...

    Though, even those, would have had the surround glued to the BACK of the cone, IIRC...

    Regards,
    Gordon.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. What to do with 2231a's
    By andywin in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 01-09-2005, 11:07 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •