View Poll Results: Do we need a dedicated sub-forum for "Amps, preamps and EQ's"

Voters
36. You may not vote on this poll
  • Great idea!! Shoulda done this long ago.

    25 69.44%
  • No need - I don't want anyone's advice on this. I'm here for JBL!!

    9 25.00%
  • What is an EQ, anyway?

    2 5.56%
  • Abstain. :dont-know

    0 0%
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Amplifiers, preamps and EQ's Sub-Forum

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142

    Amplifiers, preamps and EQ's Sub-Forum

    Doods and doodettes...

    The (relative... ) success of the DIY sub-forum has me thinking. There is a never-ending slew of questions on amps, preamps and EQ's - the mere volume of which suggest there might be need for a dedicated sub-forum. Hell - I don't even know if we can get this to pass muster, but stuffing all this into the "Off Topic", an area otherwise reserved for awkward discussions of politics, earthquakes and not enough sex, make them less easily reviewed.

    What say ye, membership?
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Toronto
    Posts
    1,162
    Quote Originally Posted by boputnam
    Doods and doodettes...

    The (relative... ) success of the DIY sub-forum has me thinking. There is a never-ending slew of questions on amps, preamps and EQ's - the mere volume of which suggest there might be need for a dedicated sub-forum. Hell - I don't even know if we can get this to pass muster, but stuffing all this into the "Off Topic", an area otherwise reserved for awkward discussions of politics, earthquakes and not enough sex, make them less easily reviewed.

    What say ye, membership?
    Agreed Bo. It just makes sense that to squeeze every bit of performance out great transducers, you have to feed them right. As the old adage acknowledges - "Garbage in, Garbage out".

  3. #3
    Senior Member Ducatista47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Peoria, Illinois
    Posts
    1,886
    Personally, I get limited enjoyment listening to signals from science class coin-and-wet-cardboard batteries and a code key. I think my JBL's sound better and way more interesting when I use amplifiers and their associated equipment.

    "Sounds" like an indispensable topic to me. I vote yes.

    Clark in Peoria

    PS Matching speakers to amps is a vital topic with most models and a non topic with some. Just because my JBL's don't seem picky is not reason enough to loose interest in the subject.
    Information is not Knowledge; Knowledge is not Wisdom
    Too many audiophiles listen with their eyes instead of their ears


  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042

    Tough one

    On one hand, it's good to see what other people use and suggest, on another hand, it's cause for a lot of opinions on nonLH stuff (for the most part), on another hand, it might break the somewhat unified theme of LH into NAD vs. Adcom vs. Mac vs. Crown vs. Pioneer vs. ????, and on the final hand, it could promote better utilization of JBL products.

    On balance, though, I'd have to say, "No."
    Out.

  5. #5
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,202
    Well what are we here for?? Do we want to start opening different catagories or just keep threads like that in Off Topic. If we do that we are opening the door to becoming just another AA or AR. I think we should keep the forums focused towards Lansing Heritage and not open them up like that. What's next wires????

    JMHO Rob

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Good idea Bo.

    Well there had to be a n......... in the wood pile.

    I think its a good idea but don't say I said so..

    We're here to get the best out of the Lansing Heritage stuff and enjoy it

    Put stuff like , Add Crossover ,RTA and Clio in there unless someone ???? thinks they are irrelevent. JBL is related to Pro applications and JBL products include these product lines..Urie Eq.....etc.

    There need to be education, the good and bad, review and experiences.

  7. #7
    Senior Member JuniorJBL's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    1,723
    I like the idea as well.


    We do have a very good crossover from JBL that alot of people use here and that would just be another reason to have it in its own area.
    I say YES

  8. #8
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743

    FWIW...

    Well, it would make it simpler to ignore (or concentrate on) if it was all in once place...

    Frankly, just the action of categorizing Off Topic material gives it more weight
    than matters to me.

    I'd guess that doing so would encourage interest/volume in topics that are more than
    sufficiently covered elsewhere (and appropriately so).

    Waffly "no" is my response, but if someone has the time to set it up...it won't kill
    me either.

    -grumpy

    (assuming Off Topic implies that the equipment is not Altec/Urei/JBL/...) ?

  9. #9
    Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Indiana, USA
    Posts
    73
    I would vote no.

    I think it would get to easy to fall into the trap of needing a page for preamps, than need one for amps, then wires, then stands, then saws, then music, then banana plugs....
    I see off topic as off topic.

    Thank you all for a wonderful site. I learn something every time I visit.
    Kevin.

  10. #10
    RIP 2013 Rolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Skien, Norway
    Posts
    2,298
    As much as I love electronics, I think we are fine with what is now, so I vote for JBL.

    Rolf

  11. #11
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    Amplifiers, preamps and EQ's Sub-Forum

    JBL & Altec electronics right? Urei perhaps as well?

  12. #12
    Senior Member Uncle Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oregon City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    388
    Quote Originally Posted by Giskard
    JBL & Altec electronics right? Urei perhaps as well?
    THAT I could go with
    "Zobel is as zobel does"

  13. #13
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,735
    I agree with Rob... besides we all know Bo likes QSC and Ian likes DIY amps. That's fine. Thread closed, end of story.

    I agree with Giskard too... Altec and JBL amps makes sense, this isn't an all audio discussion board and shouldn't be one. The dalliances into amps, wires, cars, and even politics are fine in the proportion we have them.


    Widget

  14. #14
    RIP 2013 Rolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Skien, Norway
    Posts
    2,298
    Quote Originally Posted by Giskard
    JBL & Altec electronics right? Urei perhaps as well?
    As I said ... JBL, and that include ALL JBL products.

    Rolf

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •