+ Reply to Thread
Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 19

Thread: In With The New

  1. #1
    Senior Member MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    169

    In With The New

    VR-4
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Von Schweikert VR-8
    Canary Ref. 1 300B monoblocks. 300Bx16

  2. #2
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    8,497
    Ok, so I am showing my age or ignorance. What's a VR-4?

  3. #3
    Senior Member MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    169

    Vr-4

    Von Schiekert Monitors Similar to watt/ puppy wilson. Had jbls for 30 years time to try something a bit diffrent. I have my frontroom again. Aboslute sound best buy ect ect.
    http://www.vonschweikert.com
    Last edited by MikeM; 10-07-2003 at 08:32 PM.
    Von Schweikert VR-8
    Canary Ref. 1 300B monoblocks. 300Bx16

  4. #4
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Destiny
    Posts
    7,514
    You Traitor

    Good luck with them. Would you post some photo's once you get them set-up. I have seen some scuttlebutt about them let us know what you think??


    Rob

  5. #5
    Senior Member MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    169

    Trader

    Trust me I woulnt have spent the money if I didnt feel they were worth it. They are not for everyone. They are spookey Thats for sure. Do a google search on them.
    Von Schweikert VR-8
    Canary Ref. 1 300B monoblocks. 300Bx16

  6. #6
    Webmaster Don McRitchie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    2,040
    The VR-4 was a well regarded speaker, but I cannot offer a personal opinion since I have not heard them. However, I remember very well the online debate that occurred in 1997-98 between Albert Von Schweikert and John Dunlavy of Dunlavy Audio Labs in the rec.audio.opinion newsgroup. I was a regular reader of that group at the time. Albert did not come out well in that debate. My opinion after reading the entire debate was that Albert is a quack - he lied about his credentials and spouted theories that had no relation to physical science. Nonetheless, the consensus opinion seemed to be that he lucked out with the VR-4 design and ended up with a decent sounding speaker.

    Part of the debate is archived here:

    http://home.austin.rr.com/tnulla/dunlavy7.htm

    However, you have to do a Google Group search of "Dunlavy Von Schweikert" to get the whole story. Be forwarned, there are many hundreds of posts (much that are off topic) that you have to wade through to cover the whole debate.
    Regards

    Don McRitchie

  7. #7
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,040

    If it sounds like a duck and it's not a duck, that's hi fi.

    I've heard the VR-3 quite a bit. Good speaker. Very natural, balanced, non-fatigueing; impressive sound stage. Uses rear-firing ambience tweeter, wide-range mid speaker carries a lot of the progam. The VR-4 is said to be a big leap beyond, so I'm looking forward to Mike's report.

    David

  8. #8
    Senior Member MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    169

    set up

    Im in the set up mode now. Im not rushing this one. Too bad the debate is only the defence side of dunlavy looking forward to hearing Alberts comments on the matter. The weak Link will be the front end Here. I am really looking forward to obtaining the best out of these units let me tell ya. will keep you posted.
    Von Schweikert VR-8
    Canary Ref. 1 300B monoblocks. 300Bx16

  9. #9
    Moderator / Treasurer/Marketplace Czar boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,904

    Re: Vr-4

    Originally posted by MikeM
    Had jbls for 30 years time to try something a bit diffrent.
    Been there, done that.

    "There's no place like home..."
    Dorothy
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Orange County, California
    Posts
    109
    I live in Southern California and back in 1986 Al had a reputation for being the local audio guru. He had tons of different amps and drivers and was always trying out different combinations. He was very nice and generous with his time and helped me design a sound system for my 911, which sounded great. (Of course, you couldn’t really appreciate it unless the car was parked).

  11. #11
    Senior Member MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    169

    Trader

    Originally posted by Mr. Widget
    Ok, so I am showing my age or ignorance. What's a VR-4?
    Just to let you guys know I havent stopped loving JBLs. as A matter of fact Iv begun collecting drivers for my next project 4355 modified Im goinfg to align the drivers coils ect and know a old mcintosh engineer that said he would give me a prototype crosover together. Will try 2" thich cabnets this time this will be my third 4350 pair ive built. link http://audiogon.com/cgi-bin/cl.pl?spkrmoni&1070483292
    Last edited by MikeM; 10-09-2003 at 06:19 PM.
    Von Schweikert VR-8
    Canary Ref. 1 300B monoblocks. 300Bx16

  12. #12
    Senior Member MikeM's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Las Vegas NV
    Posts
    169

    Review

    http://www.vonschweikert.com/reviews/AUDIOVOICE35.HTM
    If you have a couple of minutes please read this review of my new monitors. This is one of many.
    Do these compare with the guttsie sound of JBL large format Hell No. But intresting just the same
    Last edited by MikeM; 10-14-2003 at 08:53 PM.
    Von Schweikert VR-8
    Canary Ref. 1 300B monoblocks. 300Bx16

  13. #13
    Senior Member Don C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Santa Rosa CA
    Posts
    1,315
    There are four copies of the review on one page, and it does not render correctly in Internet Explorer. I hope his speaker designs are better than his web design.

    Type "ctrl+a" to select all of the text, then you can read the article.
    Last edited by Don C; 10-15-2003 at 02:35 PM.

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Guadalajara, Mexico
    Posts
    1,019

    Smile

    Yeah, there is a left black margin, so You have to use Yr imagination, for that money they should correct it. I know Audax and Vifa, but could not make what the woofers are.

    Alex.

  15. #15
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    8,497
    I went to Von Schweikert's website to check out the specs on the VR-4. They claim to crossover to the tweeter at 500Hz That is the specified resonant frequency of that tweeter if you check it out on the Vifa website. I really doubt Von Schweikert's specs. I am not saying that the VR-4s are bad, I'll take MikeM's word for it that they are great, but they do seem to make some unrealistic claims. (JBL has never done that. )



    I have heard that tweeter in other systems and it is good. If I were to go the dome and cone route today I would use the current top of the line SEAS Excel line that have been very successfully used by DIY and major label designers alike. Used in the $20K Joseph Audio Pearls, they sound fantastic.

+ Reply to Thread

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts