Page 2 of 2 FirstFirst 12
Results 16 to 21 of 21

Thread: Driver Magnet Size

  1. #16
    jimd
    Guest
    A friend of mine once told me the two drivers had the same magnet, I wasn't sure, but now have to have to admit he was right. I am willing to bet the magnet will weigh 1.2 lbs, the same as the Altec 802! Children of a common parent.

    Like I earlier said, I do not have the experience with these drivers I have with the Altecs. In you opinions which is the better sounding unit, the 2420 or 2421? I also wonder if the two diaphragm are made of the same thickness of aluminum?

    JIM
    Last edited by jimd; 01-31-2006 at 01:36 AM. Reason: spelling

  2. #17
    Senior Member jbl_man_uk's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    London UK
    Posts
    107
    .....Interesting thread...i have several 2420`s and 2410s here,but strangely the smaller bodied 2410 is louder in every case...u would have thought the larger pot and thus magnetic return structure would have made the 2420 the louder....obviously i swaped the diaphramms about to make sure that wasnt causing it...and tried it on several different units incase some of the 2420 were down on gauss...but every time the smaller 2410 was louder.

  3. #18
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,735
    Quote Originally Posted by subwoof
    The magnets are the same size.
    Imagine my surprise!

  4. #19
    jimd
    Guest
    Dear Subwoof,

    Replied to your PM, are ypu still out there?

    Jim

  5. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111

    Unfinished Business

    Quote Originally Posted by jimd
    Dave, this my not be the case. They may have the same magnet, the larger structure of the 275/2420/85 may be more efficient and raise the flux density.
    This was truly one of those eureka moments ( at least for me ) in the history of this forum .

    Steve Schell ( anyone ), would you care to speculate on who was responsible for the redesign of the magnetic return circuit that resulted in getting more ooomph out of the 175 ( & its standard sized 1.2 lb alnico ring magnet ) ?

    - I'm going to go with Bart Locanthi and those mid-fifties collaborations with Ampex ( Magnetics ) , as the design team responsible for filling in the ( product ) lineup ( & thus creating the 275 ) between the 175 & the 375 .

    <> cheers

  6. #21
    Webmaster Don McRitchie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    1,753
    It was Bart. He was responsible for the 275 and 375 which ustilized cast pot structures. He was also responsible for JBL converting their bass drivers from machined pots to cast pots around the same time. Later at Altec in the early 70's, he did the same thing with the 416 and I believe the 515 so that they were redesigned with cast pots.
    Regards

    Don McRitchie

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Iconic Mfg. Co. to Exhibit @ Great Plains AudioFest in Tulsa 4/29-5/1!
    By Todd W. White in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 05-11-2005, 04:20 AM
  2. Damaged magnet on 2426H driver
    By JBL Dog in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-23-2005, 03:51 PM
  3. Polarity and 4343 wiring
    By Tom Loizeaux in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 11-01-2004, 09:55 AM
  4. List of JBL info
    By Donald in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-27-2004, 04:17 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •