Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 41

Thread: slow and clean 4435's maybe ?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Glass City Toledo Ohio
    Posts
    213

    slow and clean 4435's maybe ?

    This is round 2 for this project , scrape the last one because I moved to fast and thought to slow , so Im going to ask a lot of questions and the road I take nobody knows untill its done.
    my first plan was to clone a system sold by E-speaker / a TAD mtm arangement. I beleave it was the 1601's and the big tad wooden horn and driver. sealed box EQed and sound correction system.
    Were I went wrong, is that I thought I could get away with a 1" compression driver (2420) and a low dollar horn (2345) and get the 2 drivers to mate at the x-over. to fix the problem I looked into a larger up graded horn like the 36"slant plate or the wood smith horn , but can't morage the house to do it ( just to much cash the wife would have a fit/ well she's gone now ! but so is my money.
    my though's are now is maybe a
    2344A horn and still using the 2420 drivers
    2123 mid bass or maybe a 8"
    1602's in a 2 1/2 way ?
    DBX drive rack studio
    lets see where this goes ?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Glass City Toledo Ohio
    Posts
    213
    WHERE'S MY 2 CENTS does this mean I'm making cents lol

  3. #3
    Senior Member remusr's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2005
    Location
    Lethbridge, AB
    Posts
    297
    My condolences on the wife thing. I went through that 6yrs ago.

    On the horn side there seem to be several 2397's coming out of the woodwork for $600 range. Not a big mortgage and they do look cool with an expanding x-section unlike those discussed and built by forum dudes which have much finer wood finishes! I expect that xsection would affect sound/efficiency/cutoff some.
    - Roy

  4. #4
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,719

    2 cents...

    The TAD 1602 is a nice woofer that goes down the deepest in the TAD 15" line (16"). It isn't your best bet for crossing over above 600Hz though. The JBL 2235 is a bit better sounding at higher frequencies and the uber expensive JBL 1500AL is better still. This combined with the fact that the 2420 sounds best when it isn't asked to go below 1200Hz makes me think you should definitely consider adding a midbass driver in there.

    In the case of the 2123, it has a very strong rising response that needs to be tamed. It can be done with an external EQ, but then you will be equalizing the entire system. It would be best if you could EQ just that driver. If you aren't up on passive filtering, you may want to pass on it. Since it appears you are not locked into any particular midbass driver, you might want to look at your options.

    As for the 2344 horn... as part of the 4430/35 it has been lovingly massaged. I wouldn't seek it out as an easy DIY project horn. I think you may be better off with a well damped Altec 511 horn. They are large, but typically quite inexpensive especially if you buy them as singles. You may need to repaint them to match. It is possible you may want to try building a pair of the smaller 1" smith horns that have been built by a few members here. Another possibility is to get a pair of "salad bowl" tractrix horns.


    Widget

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Posts
    814
    [QUOTE=kartsmart]...the wife would have a fit/ well she's gone now ! ...maybe a
    2344A horn... /QUOTE]

    Yeah, nothing makes you hornier than when the wife is out of the picture..

    Sounds like a nice project.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042

    Talking Can't resist

    [QUOTE=hapy._.face]
    Quote Originally Posted by kartsmart
    ...the wife would have a fit/ well she's gone now ! ...maybe a
    2344A horn... /QUOTE]

    Yeah, nothing makes you hornier than when the wife is out of the picture..

    Sounds like a nice project.

    Finally, a justification for horns that I can understand.
    Out.

  7. #7
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,170
    Hmm what are they called Dolly Partons?? Could be something to that


    Will add my 2 cents later,

    Widget you sure you don't have your 10's confused. The 2012 certainly has but the 2123 isn't all that bad.

    You going to be active using the DBX Drive Trac??



    Rob

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2005
    Location
    Glass City Toledo Ohio
    Posts
    213
    There is a few area's I would to try and cover.
    a
    As for passive or active crossover and filtering , Could a EQ be added between the DBX and the amp (preamp level) to EQ the driver rather than the whole system and have the same results as a passive filter. / Is there a chance the DBX studio drive rack already has this feature on board?

    Should I use one or two TAD 1602 bass drivers per channel ( I have 4 ). The room size is 14x22x9 . If 2 drivers were to be used what kind of arangement would I use / maybe a sealed box for one as a upper bass and the other ported, or ported both full bass range common chamber or 2 chambers, or as I have seen before both in a common box as a 2 1/2 way and the lower bass speaker will use the upper bass speaker as a passive radiator ? or what?

    As for the midbass, I agree there is a gap between the TAD 1602 and the 2420 drivers that need to be filled.
    I feel this area be based for optimum balance for what ever horn I use (witch one ?)or maybe not a horn at all.
    I also have a pair of ess amt 1A air motion transformer's if they can be of any use. I know some people loved them and others hated them , but when they were used with a tube amp and biamped I thought they weren't to bad. the tube amp sweeted the harshness that that they had.

  9. #9
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,170
    Well for openers give this a read if you have not already. I think it would help you and answer some of your questions. It's what got me fired up years ago to try my hand at a smaller personalized version. There is a lot of good general information in it you could apply to your own system when you build it.

    http://www.audioheritage.org/html/pe...audiophile.htm


    With the woofers I would build a test box and run them both ways to see which you happen to like best. Nothing fancy just a plain braced MDF box set-up so you can block off and change port tubes. You can jury rig the midrange sub enclosure and horn on a seperate baffle plate to see if the drivers set works and also before you invest time and money into your finished cabinets.

    For a midrange drivers you can use 8" 2118, 10's 2122/2123/2012 or 12's 2202/2204. Decide what you need of if you can audition, have a listen at a friends home.

    On the horn??? That you should have a listen if you can. You can take a 2420/2425/2426 and they will sound a bit different depending on the horn used. If you can, try and get a listen. You could find a horn your really don't like so don't get them blind unless you are willing to dump them back onto E-Bay. May take you a couple of tries to find what you really like or you could get lucky on the first shot.

    With EQ sure you can drop an EQ in between the crossover and the amps. Not to sure I would use it to EQ the speaker drivers though. What you would really need is a very flexible parametric. A 1/3 octave just would not work. You may have a parametric already built in your crossover if it is a digital unit. You could also EQ the drivers using passive components even though you are bi/tri amping. You can drop passive driver EQ networks in line to the drivers. If you where using a 2344 as an example you would use the passive compensation network from the 4430/35.

    Rob

  10. #10
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,719
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606
    Widget you sure you don't have your 10's confused. The 2012 certainly has but the 2123 isn't all that bad.
    No... not all that bad... can even be quite good, but I don't think it is plug and play either.

    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606
    Well for openers give this a read ...
    It certainly has gotten many fired up... I think it is a bit of a disservice though as many people miss the subtleties like the extensive measurement and alignment that Drew was able to do that us mere mortals can not do. Looking at this system superficially it would suggest that it is fine to run two or three systems at one end of your listening room... certainly you can, some people do, but while you may gain a large diffuse sound, you are certain to loose clarity, image specificity, and quality. But I digress...

    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606
    For a midrange drivers you can use 8" 2118, 10's 2122/2123/2012 or 12's 2202/2204. Decide what you need of if you can audition, have a listen at a friends home.

    On the horn??? That you should have a listen if you can. You can take a 2420/2425/2426 and they will sound a bit different depending on the horn used. If you can, try and get a listen. You could find a horn your really don't like so don't get them blind unless you are willing to dump them back onto E-Bay. May take you a couple of tries to find what you really like or you could get lucky on the first shot.
    I'd suggest, if you want something better than buying a stock pair of 4435s... you'll need to buy several mids and horns and play around with them until you find a combo that work together and you like. If you run out and buy a pair of mids or horns and expect them to be your final solution, you'll either become frustrated with the sound or accept a compromise. The 4435 like all of JBL's serious monitors were developed by people with decades of experience and piles of drivers to try.

    The journey is long and fun... as Rob suggests be prepared to buy and sell a few items on eBay, or save up a few bucks sell the TADs and buy a nice pair of 4435s.

    Widget

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,942
    Why not build this;

    Bi amp at 300 hz and use the 3135 network with a 2344 horn and the 2420 (you can get them if you know where to look) I originally used an Audax hi sensitivity 8 inch driver then the 2122H.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  12. #12
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,719
    Ian,

    Why did you move away from the 2344 horn and go with the 2307?

    Widget

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,942
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget
    Ian,

    Why did you move away from the 2344 horn and go with the 2307?

    Widget
    What?

    If you want the long anwser use the serach button. Yawn...

    The short answer is I went and had a damm good listen to the 4343's I build 20 odd years earlier and I woke up.

    I think that is a good enough reason.

    Actually I hold Ken and Bo fully responsible.

    Ken go my interest in the 4345 and I knew I was on the right track when he sold them to Bo (sorry Ken)

    Bo so kindly measured up baffles for me.

    It depends on your room. My room suits the 2308/ 2308 and 2405 config better.

    And the ladies prefer the 4343 look of course.

    Ian

  14. #14
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,170
    Or these.

    Widget brought up a good point. You need to have some kind of measurement system to be able to build any of these systems. Even if you do a clone of a system you need to be able to verify driver phase, crossover slopes, and your in room frequency response. Ian has an excellent method he uses to set up driver levels on his 4345's using readilly available software that won't bankrupt you. You can also use an RTA for some basic measurements and all of what is listed above. It takes work and commitment and lots of mistakes to pull a DIY project off. You can always come to this board and we will try to help you.

    "No... not all that bad... can even be quite good, but I don't think it is plug and play either."

    Even if you do clones or buy a set of 4343's they are not plug and play. None of this stiff is. It all needs careful set-up to get the most out of it.


    Rob
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,942
    Why not evolve your system by starting out with what you've got..that''s what I did and most people around here rather and attempt to engineer the ultimate system from day one on a piece of paper which is foolish and doomed to failure as we have seen in certain circles.

    I note the Tad web page states an upper recommended crossover point of 900hz for your woofer.

    I would try it out and find a 2344 for your 2420 and run it as a two way and see how you go. I say this as its the easiest route with the most likely immediate degree success and the least expensive. As Earl posted in your other thread there are some similarities with the 2234 so you could try a 4435 configuration.

    You can then grow with your project and as you gain more understanding and experience add a midrange driver or what ever later on.

    By way of and example I initially started with a pair of Altec 515B woofers a ssub woofers and then crossed them over to a 2397 JBL horn with a 2420 driver and a converter.

    It worked okay for a simple two way and while that may not fit the thinking of those with rose colored sunglasses and more money than sense it was good foundation. I then added a 077 slot radiator and at that point sort assistance of a friend with an IMP measurement system to refine my 3 way crossover. I learnt a lot from that exercise and then later added a pair 8 in audax mid cone for only $150! At this point I biamped the system with a Crown active crossover and the consenus was it was quite a good loudspeaker.

    Looking critically at what I had I realised there were limitations with the 515B woofers so I sold them for a lot of money and bought some JBL 2245s which were more appropriate for my needs (and a vastly superior woofer for bass reflex use).

    Soon after I determined there were time alignment issues with the horn, mid cone and slot that could not be easily corrected and I took a risk and bought a pair of JBL 2344 from Westbury Audio in Canada for about $200.00

    The risk paid off but not without some help.

    I played for a month or so with various CD eq schemes and then one day I sent an email to JBL and they sent me schematics for the 3134 and 3135 (long before they were on the JBL web page).

    After building up these neworks with Hovland capacitors I stopped using the 2397 and the 077 slot and sold them off and there I was with a nice 3 way system. I rounded out the system by upgrading with a JBL 2122H mid cone.

    The fact that I rebuilt this system into a JBL 4345 is another story and it was really the challenge and personal preference.

    A 3 way system is much easier to tune and adjust, a 2 way simpler still, and a 4 way is a devil to tune but when done properly the results are impressive to say the least, particularly a JBL design like the 4345.

    I trust these thoughts will give you some perspective on reality.

    Ian

    Edit 2907 posts..about time I retired.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •