Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 17

Thread: JBL 4301B

  1. #1
    Nightbrace
    Guest

    JBL 4301B

    How favorably will the L19's compare? What other monitors under $200 will compare will either of these that are less than 19" tall and 12" wide?

  2. #2
    RIP 2009
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rohnert Park, CA
    Posts
    3,785
    I believe you have to have L19A's to match the ferrite drivers in the 4301B. The plain L19 uses alnico drivers.

    John

  3. #3
    Nightbrace
    Guest
    is there much of a difference in the crossover?

  4. #4
    RIP 2009
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rohnert Park, CA
    Posts
    3,785
    Quote Originally Posted by Nightbrace
    is there much of a difference in the crossover?
    Dig down in this thread, (message 14), for the L19 crossover info: http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...ead.php?t=5784

    JBL should have the 4301 info at their pro site.

    John

  5. #5
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Quote Originally Posted by johnaec
    JBL should have the 4301 (crossover) info at their pro site.
    3103, here: http://www.jblproservice.com/navigat...chematics.html
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  6. #6
    RIP 2009
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rohnert Park, CA
    Posts
    3,785
    It appears both the L19 and L19A both use the LE-26 for HF, the same as the 4301B, while the plain 4301 uses the LE-25 for HF. And again - the difference in LF between older and newer versions is alnico and ferrite.

    John

  7. #7
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142

    116 LF series

    Quote Originally Posted by johnaec
    And again - the difference in LF between older and newer versions is alnico and ferrite.
    And, in the ferrite series there are engineering differences, too, as reflected in the Thiele-Small parameters.

    As posted eons ago by Giskard:
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Bo,

    If those are the ones in your shop they are a step up on the L100 in many ways..all that out of a small cabinet makes them sweet.

    Ian

  9. #9
    RIP 2014 Ken Pachkowsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Baja, Mexico
    Posts
    1,696
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Mackenzie
    Bo,

    If those are the ones in your shop they are a step up on the L100 in many ways..all that out of a small cabinet makes them sweet.

    Ian
    I heard the ones in Bo's shop and they are very impressive for the size and mint I might add.

    Ken

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Got to admire oll Tin Ear Ken..he knows his stuff.

    I think it would go nicely in an apartment, great bottom end.

    Ian

  11. #11
    RIP 2014 Ken Pachkowsky's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Baja, Mexico
    Posts
    1,696
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Mackenzie
    Got to admire oll Tin Ear Ken..
    Ian
    Oh man....that hurt

    I hate moving....Did I mention that?

    Ken

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    I've been waiting for something..where is it?

    And don't be smart.

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    dc
    Posts
    12

    L19 and 4301B-- Same?

    In looking at this thread, the 116A (L19 woofer) and 116H (4301B woofer, inverted dome) have identical parameters, which is quite a fluke, as the drivers look much different from each other. They share the exact same tweeter. The crossover is nearly identical with the 4301B a 16.5uF and L19 a 18uF cap on the woofer. Cabinets look very similar in volume (within 5% volume-wise), but of different dimensions. Why isn't the 116H woofer, then, listed as a replacement for the 116A in the L19's crossover schematic sheet? Is it due solely for cosmetics? I have an L19 w/o woofers and was thinking about dropping in a pair of 116H from my beat pair of 4301B. I should expect identical sound, right?

  14. #14
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2010
    Location
    dc
    Posts
    12
    Well, inspecting both crossovers, there is a 10uF (electrolytic) on the L19 crossover, as well as two coils and a film cap of unknown capacitance. A sand resistor, too. The 4301B has two film caps, no electros. Strange about the 10uF, the L19 network referenced on this site does not include a 10uF cap in the network.

  15. #15
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    A friendly little loudspeaker

    No biggie, the designer often starts from scratch with every model... I went over these differences when this forum first started ten years ago.

    The 116A and 116H were acoustically equivalent and both used the C8R116A recone kit.

    I personally consider the 4301B a JBL hallmark. Greater by far than the sum of its parts.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. L100 and 43XX Monitor Legacy
    By Don McRitchie in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 05-22-2012, 08:09 AM
  2. Mobile JBL almost ready...
    By johnaec in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 08-01-2004, 11:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •