Page 2 of 3 FirstFirst 123 LastLast
Results 16 to 30 of 38

Thread: 4343 x 250ti

  1. #16
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Thanks Earl,

    I was just curious. Depending on how I flip my LE14 enclosures I have about 16" from floor to centerline. I know G.T. designed the 250Ti to get that LE14 off the floor a specific distance in order to compliment the range it was operating in.

    "The point is more transducers can be used to "average-down" room induced, acoustic, anamolies ."

    Yes definitely. One can run a single sub but one should also build or buy an EQ to go with it.

    This looks pretty fun:
    http://sound.westhost.com/project84.htm
    Last edited by 4313B; 09-28-2003 at 07:51 AM.

  2. #17
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Morning Earl, Giskard

    What's the deal with floor bounce?? Is it simply the the height off the floor?? Mine is 29.5 inches to the center of the 145. That works out to a 1/2 wavelength frequency of 230HZ. If that is true then you wouldn't you also expect to see a 3dB peak at 460hz from the in phase summation of the reflection. Directivity changes with frequency so wouldn't this influence the strength of the reinforcing reflection. I also thought that it was the frequency where the path lengths of the direct sound and the first reflection worked out to 1/2 wavelength difference. If that is the case would listener distance and height come into play because of the geometry? Is it all of the above??

    Thanks Rob

  3. #18
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    Hi Robh

    - Perhaps, you should start a new thread for this topic. It's actually a very broad topic.

    - The predicted analomies are easily measurable ( with your 8024 ) to determine whether or not they showup in your specific situation. The White Papers by Dr. Floyd Toole on the Harman site illuminate this subject really quite well.

    - I use a 1/2 wavelength formula, just as a guideline/reference because the speaker isn't acting as single point source ( from just the center of the cone ). The effective cancellation occurs over a broader range dependant on the diameter of the cone & actual acoustic center factors. You are right that there is probably an expected spike but a lot of systems are crossed over before that happens - but not mine. Once again , in my situation, the addition of a second driver in my MTM setup mitigates just about all the "bad effects" from floor reflections. I even hear an palpable increase in the "speed" from the whole combination. And now of course we are way off topic.

    regards <. Earl K

  4. #19
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    "And now of course we are way off topic."

    What topic?

  5. #20
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111

    Wink Topic; We don't need no ?@##@? Topic !

    Well, I thought the topic was having to choose a 4 way; 4343 vis a vis the 250ti . But like most here, once a topic gets into it's second page , I'm willing to wander into/comment on other areas.

    regards <. EarlK
    Last edited by Earl K; 09-28-2003 at 12:19 PM.

  6. #21
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    Re: Topic; We don't need no ?@##@? Topic !

    Oh yeah! That was the topic
    I'd personally hate to have to choose between them. Ultimately I would obviously select the 250Ti, but the 4343 is so damn fun and I could definitely see a few of my friends choosing the 4343 instead

  7. #22
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111

    Thumbs up 14"

    Well , I don't have the available footprint that a 15" speaker enclosure requires - so I'd opt for the 14" based system. I barely have the height required by most of the larger MTM systems - so I'm really restricted.

    regards <> EarlK

  8. #23
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142

    Cool Late-to-the-party, and STILL off topic

    Originally posted by Giskard
    I added a second 2245H sub and, true to form, it all came together just fine.
    Sounds like you're gettin' mighty close to a 4345 to me...

    and...

    It wouldn't surprise me to find that those who dislike subs have never run more than one.
    Great point. I dislike subs, but love the 4345 and 4350-55. I should find someone to try this.

    I did notice at a recent Joe Cocker show (grab it, if he's anywhere near your town ) they were running what seemed to be paired 2234's in subcabinets, stage right/left.
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  9. #24
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    "Sounds like you're gettin' mighty close to a 4345 to me... "
    I've been building 2245H subs for over twenty years, this is just one more pair in a long string of them.

    "I dislike subs, but love the 4345 and 4350-55."
    Hmmm... I'll bow out of this discussion right about now

  10. #25
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Bo there Boy,

    Please explain yourself:

    "Great point. I dislike subs, but love the 4345 and 4350-55. I should find someone to try this. "

    I'd love to heard your perception on this topic....by morning

    My take on this like all sub stuff has been beaten to death many times before...but 2245s in the 4345s are tuned differently and also do not incur same the group delay associated with crossing over a typical sub @80 hertz, this appears to be the culprit with integration of subs / mains in many cases, apart from running the subs too loud.

    Ian lights out


    :o
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  11. #26
    Junior Member Godofredo's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brasil
    Posts
    10
    Hi everyone,

    I'd like to say a big thank you to you all for the answers and advices.
    I'll keep both models. Your answers and advices were invaluable.
    Once again and again, thank you very very much.

    Regards,

    Godofredo

  12. #27
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Originally posted by Ian Mackenzie
    I'd love to heard your perception on this topic....by morning
    My only feeble point is, the subs I've heard in home systems are mud (Widget's upperfloor system being uniquely different). The 4345's you featured are not muddy at all.

    It was posited that subs might be better in pairs, rather than single. I'm keen to taste-test that, since the 4345's are paired, and I really like their ULF sound, eh?

    But hey - we're way long onto Page Two, and you know what Earl sez...
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  13. #28
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Well just disconnect one woofer and you'll know the answer

    But be careful, it may upset the fluid balance in your inner ear.

    Ian

  14. #29
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    "It was posited that subs might be better in pairs, rather than single."

    Might???

    At least read the Harman white papers. They "might" shed some light.

    "the subs I've heard in home systems are mud"

    Hmmm, never heard 121/124/2203 subs eh?
    136/2231 subs?
    LE14 subs?
    2235 subs?
    2245 subs?
    2242 subs?

    I suppose any of these can be made to sound like mud if one doesn't have a clue as to what they are dealing with

  15. #30
    Senior Seņor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    ok, OK, [size=huge]OK!![/size]

    Dammit, I meant the crummy little typically black meager little cube consumer subs that people attach to an already lame system. Whew! Does that help! Man it's TOUGH out here

    No, oh esteemed SubOne, I have not heard all them, and you knew that! Meanie!

    And you, you DownUnder DIYer, I'm gonna disconnect BOTH 2245's, that will show YOU!! Uh, wait a minute...

    Come on, gimme some L100's to bash - I need a lift!
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 4343 VS 4345 network?
    By tv506 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-17-2011, 08:12 AM
  2. L250 -> 250Ti Upgrade and Differences
    By jblnut in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 04-22-2005, 02:29 AM
  3. Size of 4343 Grill Plates?
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 14
    Last Post: 03-21-2005, 05:14 PM
  4. L300 convert to 4343?
    By tv506 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-24-2003, 12:08 PM
  5. Can 250TI BQ crossovers be used on 250TI's?
    By Ezel in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 05-12-2003, 08:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •