Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Alnico 075īs differences?

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Swedish Westcoast
    Posts
    7

    Alnico 075īs differences?

    Iīve got two old 075 units, one all aluminium, small connectors no mounting ring. One black hornbody, larger connectors and standard 4-bolt mounting ring. They do sound very different with the older one much smoother and seemingly more extended in the top while the black one is edgier and rolls off earlier at the top.
    Are there any differences in magnetic structure or in horn? Is there any way to "reverse" the newer one to match the other?

  2. #2
    Senior Member spkrman57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,018

    Can you post pics?

    It might be easier to see what we are dealing with.

    Also, there might be a difference in diaphrams(8 or 16 ohm - 2404 or 2402 diaphrams)

    Need more info to help out here.

    Regards, Ron

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Swedish Westcoast
    Posts
    7
    Tried to attach picture, trying again.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #4
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Swedish Westcoast
    Posts
    7
    One more pic. The badge on the older one has come of and is astray somewhere in the workshop, but itīs 8 ohm and as far as i recall 2402 membrane.

    Gratefull for any help Ron!

    Best Regards
    Ingvar
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  5. #5
    Senior Member Lancer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Posts
    473

    Alnico 075īs differences?

    The number of 075 variants is staggering and beyond the scope of this forum.

    SOP is to replace any 075/2402 diaphragms in pairs with the latest available.

  6. #6
    Senior Member spkrman57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,018

    Thanks to Lancer for stepping up to the plate on this one!

    I personally could only think of having it professionally disassembled and see which diaphrams are inside.

    And make sure the phase plugs/pieces are the same between both of them.

    Most of that is beyond my feeble limitations.

    Ron

  7. #7
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    I would second Lancer's suggestion that for stereo hi-fi use both be re-diaphragmed. Ideally you would have both recharged as well.

    I would speculate that the "older" one which is a domestic model has seen an easier life than the 70's era pro 2402 model you have there. In a PA or musical instrument application, it is quite possible that it has been abused or simply worn out. In addition, I see that the 2402, has been re-diaphragmed already. It may no longer have a JBL diaphragm in it or it may be improperly installed.


    Widget

  8. #8
    RIP 2013 Rolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Skien, Norway
    Posts
    2,298
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget
    Ideally you would have both recharged as well.
    Widget
    Why would you do that Widget? As far as I have read, and been told (on this forum and other places) the need for recharging on midrange and high frq compression drivers is not needed. They will never loose the power.

    I can understand if used for PA, but in a studio or home? Is there possible to stress them in this use?

    Rolf

  9. #9
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740

    When in doubt, go the extra mile...

    I would do it as it isn't that expensive, and is the only way to be certain the magnets are 100%. It is highly unlikely that the power sent to one of these UHF devices would ever be a problem for the magnet, but dropping them is also a problem. A PA/Musical instrument driver can have a pretty rough life.


    Widget

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2005
    Location
    The Swedish Westcoast
    Posts
    7
    Thankīs everybody for all input! Iīll start with changing diaphragms, i suppose the best would be to use the 077 version? They will be used domestically and indoors for smaller linedance gigs.

  11. #11
    RIP 2013 Rolf's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Skien, Norway
    Posts
    2,298
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget
    I would do it as it isn't that expensive, and is the only way to be certain the magnets are 100%. It is highly unlikely that the power sent to one of these UHF devices would ever be a problem for the magnet, but dropping them is also a problem. A PA/Musical instrument driver can have a pretty rough life.


    Widget
    I understand Widget. For a moment I thought I had to take my drivers to the "doctor".

    Rolf

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. The Great Alnico / Ferrite Debate
    By Don McRitchie in forum General
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-16-2007, 04:53 AM
  2. Digital Hardware Sonic Differences
    By Don McRitchie in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 04-19-2005, 12:39 PM
  3. LE5-2 AlNiCo vs LE5-5 Ferrite
    By magnet in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 04-08-2004, 10:00 AM
  4. Alnico Demagnetize?
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 06-12-2003, 02:21 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •