Page 3 of 6 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 84

Thread: Flattest response between 2000hz - 20 000hz

  1. #31
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Quote Originally Posted by whgeiger

    WW,


    Most of my posts here are usually 'pooh-poohed’ on the basis of the specious ‘theory vs. practice’ argument. This is utter nonsense as the latter is nothing more than implementation of the former when a rational design path is taken. If the recommendations made are followed intelligently, coupled with some modicum of craftsmanship, superior results can be obtained. Bent nails are not the fault of a misused ball-peen hammer. Loudspeaker components designed to cover an audience at a rock concert are usually unsuitable for use in a confined, at-home venue. Typically, when modest equalization makes the music 'sound bad', what is being revealed are imperfections in the source or other system component(s). The degree of signal mangling that takes place to get to the recording stage makes what happens afterward some what a trivial matter so long as the reproducing system is of decent quality and not in need of repair.

    Regards,

    WHG
    I agree with you completely. Except for the part about your posts being 'pooh-poohed'... I certainly don't disregard your posts as being too anything. I think they are thoughtful and on point, though I may not always agree with your conclusions. ( I probably agree with more of what you post than you think.)

    In your post above about PA gear and bent nails, we are in 100% agreement. I don't think my posts on this thread are incongruous with your rationale.

    Widget

    BTW: The TD4003 is not a PA driver. The TD4002 is typically used in that application, but they are very different animals.

    PS. Just read Rob's response... I too thought of the venerable 375 driver and it's many uses. I would suggest that the drivers themselves when well designed as are the 375 and others, are fine in any application, it is the implementation that makes the difference. I would never use a PA horn on a driver for use in my listening room. Beyond that there is also personal preference. There are many who enjoy a 2370 horn in their living room... I wouldn't.

  2. #32
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740

    Back on topic

    Along with the B&C drivers I have heard good things about Beyma. The initial question though was what is the flattest response.

    I would suggest that while the drivers do matter, since most drivers made today from JBL and others are all quite good, the horn will have at least as much if not more of an effect on your final sound.


    Widget

  3. #33
    Niklas Nord
    Guest
    How can I calculate the right horn for a horndriver? It must be a small
    horn, maximum width is some 18 - 26cm

  4. #34
    pangea
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Niklas Nord
    How can I calculate the right horn for a horndriver? It must be a small
    horn, maximum width is some 18 - 26cm
    I'd go for the selenium horn HL14-50, as in 50mm driver.

    Totally neutral in sound and doesn't cost a fortune.

    BR
    Roland

  5. #35
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    It is affordable at under $30ea.... might be a bit too beamy for my taste.

    http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/264-316.pdf
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #36
    Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    52

    yet another choice

    Hello,

    I recommend the BMS 4540nd and DDS ENG 1-90 Pro horn.

    The bms costs a bit less than the B&C mentioned above.
    http://www.bmspro.com/downloads/
    I think you can also buy the jbl 2407h which appears to be the 4540 as well.

    The DDS horn is a bit over your spec at 27cm but works well with the 4540
    http://www.ddshorns.com/catalog.php?page=ENG190Pro

    Best Regards,
    Tom

  7. #37
    pangea
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Mr. Widget
    It is affordable at under $30ea.... might be a bit too beamy for my taste.

    http://www.partsexpress.com/pdf/264-316.pdf
    Why do you think that it would be a "problem"? How often do you sit outside the sweet-spot when you listen to music and/or don't you toe in the speakers?

    I have never felt any "beaminess" while listening to these horns.
    When coupled to the 2441, the listening angle is wider than the graph shows, I'm sure, all the way up.
    EDIT: Besides, I do have a 075 on top as well, so I really don't think there are any drawbacks in using this horn.
    Only when crossed over too low, there is a slight coloration, but then again, that goes for all horns.
    But other than that, the horn is as "clean" as can be IME.

    BR
    Roland
    Last edited by pangea; 10-10-2005 at 03:07 AM. Reason: adding

  8. #38
    Niklas Nord
    Guest
    I dont want a sweetspot, it should be no sweetspot.
    I´m not alone when I watch a movie or listen to music.

    Low distorsion, uncollored, flat response, no sweetspot.

  9. #39
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,203
    "I dont want a sweetspot, it should be no sweetspot.
    I´m not alone when I watch a movie or listen to music.

    Low distorsion, uncollored, flat response, no sweetspot."

    You are going to have a problem then. I use 2344's and you are not going to find many horns that can throw a larger image across the room with there 100x100 coverage. I use them in my main system which doubles for both HT and music. The sweet spot they have is larger than the 2307/3208 lense combo but is still well defined. The timbre doesn't change as you move off axis but you loose your phantom image just like any other speaker when you go off to far to one side. I would look into the 2600/3100 horns providing you can place them correctly. They were designed for exactly what you seem to be looking for.

    Rob

  10. #40
    Niklas Nord
    Guest
    Is it not the tractrix wich have the best dispersion?

  11. #41
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Ditto what Rob said.

    Tractrix horns have a very tight and confined sweetspot. The only way to successfully play movies for several people is using an actual center channel unless you are willing to accept a major compromise.


    Widget

  12. #42
    Niklas Nord
    Guest
    I thougt tractrix was the horn wich had the best dispersion.
    It´s not only about movies Also music HAHA !

    Well, it´s hard for me to explain in english, but I thing
    you all understand what I´m out for.

  13. #43
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Quote Originally Posted by pangea
    How often do you sit outside the sweet-spot when you listen to music and/or don't you toe in the speakers?
    Never. With horn speakers I almost always toe them in.

    Quote Originally Posted by pangea
    I have never felt any "beaminess" while listening to these horns.
    When coupled to the 2441, the listening angle is wider than the graph shows, I'm sure, all the way up.
    EDIT: Besides, I do have a 075 on top as well, so I really don't think there are any drawbacks in using this horn.
    I am not sure that there would be a problem... I was speculating. I do find the 075 way too beamy for my taste though. I suppose like everything else in this hobby we all bring different expectations and requirements to it.

    Widget

  14. #44
    Niklas Nord
    Guest
    What does "beamy" mean?

  15. #45
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Like a flashlight...

    http://www.maglite.com/index_flash.asp


    Widget

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 4343 crossover modifications
    By jeph in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 514
    Last Post: 07-25-2019, 08:36 PM
  2. 2123H response
    By faulken in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 03-31-2007, 10:00 AM
  3. 2012H enclosure size?
    By Baron030 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 69
    Last Post: 09-27-2005, 08:34 PM
  4. Does Ti Increase UHF Response?
    By Mr. Widget in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 9
    Last Post: 01-25-2005, 02:33 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •