Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 71

Thread: Baffle layout

  1. #31
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    Symmetry

    In real life, this simply sounds better
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #32
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    Re: Symmetry

    than this
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. #33
    Senior Señor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    With ports, thusly...?
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  4. #34
    Senior Member DavidF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Sonoma County CA
    Posts
    946
    Thanks, Giskard, for the effort to post these items. No doubt it took a fair amount of time. This is the type of material I enjoy that once fed the home-builder types that we do not see anymore (save a few that linger around these parts, me included).

    Bo, your position on the port may be better, as mentioned, to keep it away from the internal surfaces. These can alter the air motion around the port, or so I read. You will note that the L110 for instance tucks the port way down in the corner. No doubt this is more of a design compromise. Can’t get you to move the crossover to back side, huh?

    David F

  5. #35
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Now this modification would get rid of all that excess baffle and allow the speakers to image more like one of those &$#@% audiophile speakers.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #36
    Senior Señor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    from DavidF
    Can’t get you to move the crossover to back side, huh?
    Well, the N65 network is on the rear, with the binding posts handily fit through an opening. But it's darn convenient to have the L-pad on the face. Plus, since it is a pristine L65 face-plate, it looks nice, too!

    I take note of your concern on resonance, and need for bracing. But, this baffle is 3/4-in oak plywood, and much more stout than MDF. It feels very solid, but man, when all the transducers are mounted, that baffle weighs a tonne. The baffle will be secured to the 3/4-in lip remains of the original baffle with 8-32 machine screws and T-nuts, so things should be good.

    Oh, btw, that suggestion of Sono Tube from Gordon W is tops. That stuff is very heavy duty, and makes an excellent mid-range subenclosure. After all is dried and such in the next week, I'll post some pics to "feed the home builder types - which is all of us, at least in spirit!
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  7. #37
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    "Thanks, Giskard, for the effort to post these items."

    My pleasure. I hope everyone enjoys the postings.

    "You will note that the L110 for instance tucks the port way down in the corner. No doubt this is more of a design compromise."

    True. Like the L96 and 4313, the port/duct is bent 45 degrees and points up into the interior of the enclosure. I think that very same port is also used in the 4311 and 4312.

    "Now this modification would get rid of all that excess baffle and allow the speakers to image more like one of those &$#@% audiophile speakers."

    I was just trying to illustrate the point of mounting off-axis. The original L212 was very symmetrical. I didn't really want to change the actual physical dimensions of the L212 enclosure for the illustration.

    "Oh, btw, that suggestion of Sono Tube from Gordon W is tops. That stuff is very heavy duty, and makes an excellent mid-range subenclosure."

    Yes, I use them to make 112, 2108, 2122 and 2202 subenclosures. There are two places here in town that sell them. One will cut them up to any length I want and the other won't. You can probably guess which place I go to

  8. #38
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Originally posted by Giskard
    "Thanks, Giskard, for the effort to post these items."

    My pleasure. I hope everyone enjoys the postings.

    "Now this modification would get rid of all that excess baffle and allow the speakers to image more like one of those &$#@% audiophile speakers."

    I was just trying to illustrate the point of mounting off-axis. The original L212 was very symmetrical. I didn't really want to change the actual physical dimensions of the L212 enclosure for the illustration.

    Yes thank you very much. You have posted hours of fun reading on the site. Quite a Labor Day!

    On the L212, I was poking at JBL and having a little fun drawing on your post.

  9. #39
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Hey Mr. Widget

    You making fun of my XPL's
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  10. #40
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Striking resemblance! How do they sound?

  11. #41
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    They sound great! Really like that TI mid and they do image well. Would love to hear the real thing! I saw your sketch and well LOL I couldn't resist .

    Rob

  12. #42
    Senior Señor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142

    Finally, a CLOSE-UP!!

    OK, Rob...

    Now, give us the assemblage, piece-by-piece. We want to know all.

    1. Transducers, by relative position and offset.

    2. Then, go over the networks - active and passive

    3. Then, the amps/EQ's, pre's...[/list=4]

    Come on!
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

  13. #43
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Dang Bo, do you want his inseam too!

  14. #44
    Alex Lancaster
    Guest

    Question

    When using a comp driver in reverse, as pictured, what do You do with the horn exit?, make a plate to cover it, or add more volume?

    Do You reverse the polarity?

    Thanks.

  15. #45
    Senior Señor boputnam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    northern california
    Posts
    6,142
    Widget...

    I'm guessing it's all here: Describe your HiFi System - Link but I was hoping for a but more detail to accompany the Zoomed view...



    and, Alex...

    Those are great questions!!
    bo

    "Indeed, not!!"

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Center Channel Help Needed
    By DAVID POHLER in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 28
    Last Post: 09-18-2017, 01:44 PM
  2. Romoving G50 baffle?
    By vifa32144 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 05-06-2009, 12:13 PM
  3. Cutting Baffle Board
    By majick47 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-01-2004, 11:34 PM
  4. S70 Alpha/Alpha II/Alpha III baffle layout?
    By GordonW in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 07-12-2004, 08:58 PM
  5. Driver Spacing and Baffle Layout
    By Robh3606 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-23-2004, 10:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •