Page 3 of 3 FirstFirst 123
Results 31 to 45 of 45

Thread: Neodymium or ceramic?

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042
    Quote Originally Posted by stevem
    Scott, did you ever get these woofers up and running? Have you posted your evaluation of their sound yet? I'd really like to know what you think of the sound of the neo woofers as compared to the ferrites.
    Yes, inquiring minds want to know.
    Out.

  2. #32
    RIP 2010 scott fitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    4,343

    Still listening!

    Ill post a well thought out opinion later today! Been super busy this weekend, and havent really been paying attention!

    Get out of here at 4:30AM, get home its 5:10AM, sleep till 9:30AM, get up and come back all over again! Im not in critical listening mode, yet!

    scottyj

  3. #33
    Senior Member louped garouv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    formerly "the city where imagination takes precedence over fact"
    Posts
    2,152
    Quote Originally Posted by scott fitlin
    Ill post a well thought out opinion later today! Been super busy this weekend, and havent really been paying attention!

    Get out of here at 4:30AM, get home its 5:10AM, sleep till 9:30AM, get up and come back all over again! Im not in critical listening mode, yet!

    at least you have good toys to play with at work...... I get to be a spreadsheet jockey from 8-5.....

  4. #34
    Regis
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by louped garouv
    at least you have good toys to play with at work...... I get to be a spreadsheet jockey from 8-5.....

    You too? I crunch numbers all day long and mostly used Excel, but now I'm hooked on MS Access. Especially if you have 30,000+ line databases! The Access queries just make it magic and then Excel puts the polish to the finished analysis, via Pivot charts.

  5. #35
    Senior Member louped garouv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    formerly "the city where imagination takes precedence over fact"
    Posts
    2,152

    sorry for the hijack

    Quote Originally Posted by Regis
    You too? I crunch numbers all day long and mostly used Excel, but now I'm hooked on MS Access. Especially if you have 30,000+ line databases! The Access queries just make it magic and then Excel puts the polish to the finished analysis, via Pivot charts.
    I agree that the database option is much much better, but I work for an organization with fairly antiquated systems (make that really antiquated -- mainframes written in COBAL); but we are supposedly migrating to SAP within the next few years.......

    Hopefully I will have my CPA and have moved on by then....

  6. #36
    Webmaster Don McRitchie's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg, Canada
    Posts
    1,753
    I have some general comments about magnets as a result of some of the issues raised above. Threre are two main characteristics of magnets that affect loudspeaker performance: flux modulation and temperature losses. Each characteristic has a range in which degradation is reversable, and a point beyond which degradation is irreversable. With regards to flux modulation in the reversible range, the main magnet types rank as follows from best to worst:

    1) Alnico
    2) Neodymium
    3) Ferrite

    When ranking the threshold at which flux modulation leads to permanent energy losses, the order changes to:

    1) Neodymium
    2) Ferrite
    3) Alnico

    With regards to termperature performance in the reversible range, magnet types rank as follows:

    1) Alnico
    2) Neodymium
    3) Ferrite

    When ranking the threshold at which temperature leads to permanent energy losses, the order changes to:

    1) Alnico
    2) Ferrite
    3) Neodymium

    As you can see, no one magnet type performs best under all conditions. Now factor in cost, energy by weight and ease of fabrication and you can see that a loudspeaker designer has numerous variables that dictate different choices depending on application.

    As I have said many times, none of the deficiencies above are absolute and you can manage or improve performance for each material through engineering choices in application. Obviously, this carries a cost constraint.

    With regards to the temperature issue that started this thread, Neodymium magnets most definitely can be permanently damaged at temperatures as low as 300 degrees F (far lower than Alnico or ferrite). That is why JBL goes to such great lengths to heat sink and convectively cool neo drivers. This works so effectively, that the last time I talked to JBLPro they had seen less than one dozen driver returns with temperature damaged drivers out of the tens of thousands of neo drivers they have made.
    Regards

    Don McRitchie

  7. #37
    Senior Member louped garouv's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    formerly "the city where imagination takes precedence over fact"
    Posts
    2,152
    OMG -- some of you all are like a walking tech manuals..... Seriously, thanks for sharing, I learn so much through great forums like this....

    but thanks for the words in no uncertain terms for those of us who are a bit thick...

    basically, if you map out primary use (maybe abuse ) patterns... it is more likely that you will be happy with your driver selection long term..... and you may be able to do things more cost effectively based on the driver selection as well???

  8. #38
    aust-ted
    Guest

    Excellent reference material

    Quote Originally Posted by Don McRitchie
    I have some general comments about magnets as a result of some of the issues raised above. Threre are two main characteristics of magnets that affect loudspeaker performance: flux modulation and temperature losses. Each characteristic has a range in which degradation is reversable, and a point beyond which degradation is irreversable. With regards to flux modulation in the reversible range, the main magnet types rank as follows from best to worst:

    1) Alnico
    2) Neodymium
    3) Ferrite

    When ranking the threshold at which flux modulation leads to permanent energy losses, the order changes to:

    1) Neodymium
    2) Ferrite
    3) Alnico

    With regards to termperature performance in the reversible range, magnet types rank as follows:

    1) Alnico
    2) Neodymium
    3) Ferrite

    When ranking the threshold at which temperature leads to permanent energy losses, the order changes to:

    1) Alnico
    2) Ferrite
    3) Neodymium

    As you can see, no one magnet type performs best under all conditions. Now factor in cost, energy by weight and ease of fabrication and you can see that a loudspeaker designer has numerous variables that dictate different choices depending on application.

    As I have said many times, none of the deficiencies above are absolute and you can manage or improve performance for each material through engineering choices in application. Obviously, this carries a cost constraint.

    With regards to the temperature issue that started this thread, Neodymium magnets most definitely can be permanently damaged at temperatures as low as 300 degrees F (far lower than Alnico or ferrite). That is why JBL goes to such great lengths to heat sink and convectively cool neo drivers. This works so effectively, that the last time I talked to JBLPro they had seen less than one dozen driver returns with temperature damaged drivers out of the tens of thousands of neo drivers they have made.
    Don, I have read this post belately. Great stuff. Thanks

    I recommend this post be appended to Don's classic "The Great Alnico/ Ferrite Debate" in the technical reference section. I often refer this to anyone asking me about ferrite v alnico.

    Regards
    Ted

  9. #39
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    upminster
    Posts
    18

    energised?

    nobody's mentioned the alternative of field coil drivers..
    the japanese are so hooked on these, pay megabucks and are even making new from scratch (shindolabs). is there something in their argument that only a field coil can provide the required linearity to resolve detail at volume (something like electrostatics having a powerfull HT supply). maybe the future is superconducting (liquid nitrogen cooled!!!!!) please im trying to make a serious point, ive been dreaming about this for 20 years, but then i am a bit crazy (got an A in physics Alevel (high school) then went and wasted a year at medical school).

  10. #40
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,740
    Quote Originally Posted by pde2000
    nobody's mentioned the alternative of field coil drivers..
    the japanese are so hooked on these, pay megabucks and are even making new from scratch (shindolabs).
    Our own Steve Schell is also in the process of making contemporary field coil drivers... they aren't dead, just esoteric.


    Widget

  11. #41
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    Scott,

    What were your results from this neo-woof test run ?

    ( I missed all this previous banter since I was offline all of last summer )

  12. #42
    RIP 2010 scott fitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    4,343
    Quote Originally Posted by Earl K
    Scott,

    What were your results from this neo-woof test run ?

    ( I missed all this previous banter since I was offline all of last summer )
    VERY efficient, and very midrangey. I, after a while, got tired of the amount of mids, but the woofers play clean, and of course, loading 10lb woofers, well, I couldnt complain! The weight reduction is nice.
    scottyj

  13. #43
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,111
    Quote Originally Posted by scottyj
    VERY efficient, and very midrangey. I, after a while, got tired of the amount of mids, but the woofers play clean, and of course, loading 10lb woofers, well, I couldnt complain! The weight reduction is nice.
    - Thanks

    - Are you back with your Altecs?

    <>

  14. #44
    RIP 2010 scott fitlin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Brooklyn NY
    Posts
    4,343
    Quote Originally Posted by Earl K
    - Thanks

    - Are you back with your Altecs?

    <>
    Well yeah, and that too!

    But, the neo mag woofers work.
    scottyj

  15. #45
    Senior Member Steve Schell's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    R.I.P.
    Posts
    1,458
    Thanks for the mention, Mr. Widget. It has been great fun developing our drivers, which are based on the 1930s RCA phenolic cone compression driver. Lately we've been getting good response to 16kHz. with some tweaks to the diaphragms and voice coils. They can be used as low as 200Hz. as well, so the bandwidth is pretty wide.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. alnico/ferrite drivers
    By Figge in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 55
    Last Post: 08-30-2005, 06:14 PM
  2. 4344MKII and 275ND problem
    By spirou38 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 24
    Last Post: 11-20-2004, 05:12 PM
  3. Neodymium
    By John Nebel in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 10-01-2004, 08:41 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •