Yes, inquiring minds want to know.Originally Posted by stevem
Yes, inquiring minds want to know.Originally Posted by stevem
Out.
Ill post a well thought out opinion later today! Been super busy this weekend, and havent really been paying attention!
Get out of here at 4:30AM, get home its 5:10AM, sleep till 9:30AM, get up and come back all over again! Im not in critical listening mode, yet!
scottyj
at least you have good toys to play with at work...... I get to be a spreadsheet jockey from 8-5.....Originally Posted by scott fitlin
Originally Posted by louped garouv
You too? I crunch numbers all day long and mostly used Excel, but now I'm hooked on MS Access. Especially if you have 30,000+ line databases! The Access queries just make it magic and then Excel puts the polish to the finished analysis, via Pivot charts.
I agree that the database option is much much better, but I work for an organization with fairly antiquated systems (make that really antiquated -- mainframes written in COBAL); but we are supposedly migrating to SAP within the next few years.......Originally Posted by Regis
Hopefully I will have my CPA and have moved on by then....
I have some general comments about magnets as a result of some of the issues raised above. Threre are two main characteristics of magnets that affect loudspeaker performance: flux modulation and temperature losses. Each characteristic has a range in which degradation is reversable, and a point beyond which degradation is irreversable. With regards to flux modulation in the reversible range, the main magnet types rank as follows from best to worst:
1) Alnico
2) Neodymium
3) Ferrite
When ranking the threshold at which flux modulation leads to permanent energy losses, the order changes to:
1) Neodymium
2) Ferrite
3) Alnico
With regards to termperature performance in the reversible range, magnet types rank as follows:
1) Alnico
2) Neodymium
3) Ferrite
When ranking the threshold at which temperature leads to permanent energy losses, the order changes to:
1) Alnico
2) Ferrite
3) Neodymium
As you can see, no one magnet type performs best under all conditions. Now factor in cost, energy by weight and ease of fabrication and you can see that a loudspeaker designer has numerous variables that dictate different choices depending on application.
As I have said many times, none of the deficiencies above are absolute and you can manage or improve performance for each material through engineering choices in application. Obviously, this carries a cost constraint.
With regards to the temperature issue that started this thread, Neodymium magnets most definitely can be permanently damaged at temperatures as low as 300 degrees F (far lower than Alnico or ferrite). That is why JBL goes to such great lengths to heat sink and convectively cool neo drivers. This works so effectively, that the last time I talked to JBLPro they had seen less than one dozen driver returns with temperature damaged drivers out of the tens of thousands of neo drivers they have made.
Regards
Don McRitchie
OMG -- some of you all are like a walking tech manuals..... Seriously, thanks for sharing, I learn so much through great forums like this....
but thanks for the words in no uncertain terms for those of us who are a bit thick...
basically, if you map out primary use (maybe abuse ) patterns... it is more likely that you will be happy with your driver selection long term..... and you may be able to do things more cost effectively based on the driver selection as well???
Don, I have read this post belately. Great stuff. ThanksOriginally Posted by Don McRitchie
I recommend this post be appended to Don's classic "The Great Alnico/ Ferrite Debate" in the technical reference section. I often refer this to anyone asking me about ferrite v alnico.
Regards
Ted
nobody's mentioned the alternative of field coil drivers..
the japanese are so hooked on these, pay megabucks and are even making new from scratch (shindolabs). is there something in their argument that only a field coil can provide the required linearity to resolve detail at volume (something like electrostatics having a powerfull HT supply). maybe the future is superconducting (liquid nitrogen cooled!!!!!) please im trying to make a serious point, ive been dreaming about this for 20 years, but then i am a bit crazy (got an A in physics Alevel (high school) then went and wasted a year at medical school).
Our own Steve Schell is also in the process of making contemporary field coil drivers... they aren't dead, just esoteric.Originally Posted by pde2000
Widget
Scott,
What were your results from this neo-woof test run ?
( I missed all this previous banter since I was offline all of last summer )
VERY efficient, and very midrangey. I, after a while, got tired of the amount of mids, but the woofers play clean, and of course, loading 10lb woofers, well, I couldnt complain! The weight reduction is nice.Originally Posted by Earl K
scottyj
- ThanksOriginally Posted by scottyj
- Are you back with your Altecs?
<>
Well yeah, and that too!Originally Posted by Earl K
But, the neo mag woofers work.
scottyj
Thanks for the mention, Mr. Widget. It has been great fun developing our drivers, which are based on the 1930s RCA phenolic cone compression driver. Lately we've been getting good response to 16kHz. with some tweaks to the diaphragms and voice coils. They can be used as low as 200Hz. as well, so the bandwidth is pretty wide.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)