Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 20

Thread: 2245 cone dimension

  1. #1
    senile member R Beardsley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    107

    2245 cone dimension

    I would appreciate it if one of you would be kind enough to tell me the diameter of the cone proper - just inside of the foam surround.
    R Beardsley (BEAR)

  2. #2
    RIP 2009
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rohnert Park, CA
    Posts
    3,785
    14-3/4"

  3. #3
    Senior Member pmakres1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    556
    Hmmmm...my B460's 2245H cone measures 15-1/4" Dia, just inside of the foam surround.

  4. #4
    RIP 2009
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Rohnert Park, CA
    Posts
    3,785
    I wonder if they're different vintage - there were a couple different cone kits JBL used over the years. I did have this one re-foamed a few years back, but it's still got the original style cone with the white aquaplas on back. The place that did the foam is an authorized JBL dealer and did a great job, (I know it's not JBL authorized) - I can't imagine them cutting one rib off all the way around, (it doesn't look like it), but I guess anything's possible... 'Anyone else?

    John

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Winnipeg Manitoba Canada
    Posts
    2,291
    Well this is turning into a mystery??? I have a B460 with the white backed 2245 and it is 15 1/2" across the cone.

  6. #6
    Alex Lancaster
    Guest
    I have 12 2245´s, they all measure 15 1/4" of cardboard, if You measure just inside of the foam, they are 14 3/4".

  7. #7
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Can we get a visual?

  8. #8
    senile member R Beardsley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    107
    This one measures 15 1/4" but is an aftermarket I think, but I am willing to try a standard JBL foam if I think it will fit. I replaced the dust cap, which is probably a little oversize. My ear probably can't tell the difference from a REAL JBL cone, but my head is telling me that it can't possibly sound right......

    The second picture shows the same driver just before it was damaged with a rolling pin.
    Attached Images Attached Images   
    R Beardsley (BEAR)

  9. #9
    Senior Member pmakres1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    556

    15-1/4" just inside foam on front side

    Here's my 2245H Cone; I can't swear that it's never been reconed but it appears identical to the picture on the front of the JBL "Low frequency systems" brochure-same number of ribs, etc.

    Sorry I don't have the companion pic like R Beardsley!

    Peter
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  10. #10
    Senior Member spkrman57's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Columbus, Ohio
    Posts
    2,018

    I want to work in the JBL test kitchen with her!!!

    Talk about working overtime!

    Ron

  11. #11
    senile member R Beardsley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    107
    Thanks, I think a standard foam is worth a try. Mine is definitely older - having the cylindrical "all metal" contacts. I've seen newer ones with the square plastic ones. The cones look similar, except the stiffening ribs in your look smoother. Mine has intermittent "gobbs" if you look closely.
    R Beardsley (BEAR)

  12. #12
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    I thought we discussed this before - your cone is aftermarket.

    pmakres1's cone looks like the original Hawley cone.

    Here's Bo's (Hawley) :

    And Mike's (Mogami):
    Attached Images Attached Images    

  13. #13
    Senior Member pmakres1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    556
    Quote Originally Posted by Giskard
    I thought we discussed this before - your cone is aftermarket.

    pmakres1's cone looks like the original Hawley cone but the foam job looks wrong in the picture.
    I'm pretty sure this driver has never been refoamed-the transition from cone to foam is perfect as it would be on an original cone (or a recone kit). When you look up close you can usually tell a refoam and this driver does not appear to have had this done.

  14. #14
    senile member R Beardsley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2004
    Location
    Tucson, AZ
    Posts
    107

    I thought we discussed this before - your cone is aftermarket.

    Yes we did Giskard!
    I was just trying to save a couple of bucks until I can afford the real thing, and didn't know the size of a REAL JBL cone. Ordering a standard foam would not be of much use if they were a differnet size.

    R Beardsley (BEAR)

  15. #15
    Senior Member pmakres1's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Florida
    Posts
    556
    Quote Originally Posted by Giskard
    I thought we discussed this before - your cone is aftermarket.

    pmakres1's cone looks like the original Hawley cone.

    Here's Bo's (Hawley) :

    And Mike's (Mogami):
    Yes, mine looks like Bo's.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Badly Damaged 2245
    By Ian Mackenzie in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 11-09-2004, 02:10 AM
  2. LE 14C Cone
    By banker80 in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 05-26-2004, 06:30 AM
  3. 2245 cone questions
    By Phil Jeffery in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 12-09-2003, 08:02 AM
  4. 2235 and 2245
    By Niklas Nord in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 11-24-2003, 02:22 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •