Page 3 of 5 FirstFirst 12345 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 63

Thread: 2245H recone or refoam?

  1. #31
    Senior Member Ducatista47's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Peoria, Illinois
    Posts
    1,886
    Opimax, maybe this would help, maybe not. Bo's post on the old and new 2245H cone designs.

    http://audioheritage.org/vbulletin/s...5&postcount=61

    Clark in Peoria
    Information is not Knowledge; Knowledge is not Wisdom
    Too many audiophiles listen with their eyes instead of their ears


  2. #32
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wash DC suburbs
    Posts
    1,215
    Thanks! appears to be the newer recone model on the ebay auction.

    I have a velodyne sub (spl1200r), was going to get a 2nd one but will be buying this instead, hopefully replacing the desire to have the 2 smaller ones

    Mark

  3. #33
    Senior Member LowPhreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurica, Inc.
    Posts
    702
    I'm glad this topic came up again, b/c one of my 128H-1's surrounds just disintegrated the other night. I was hoping it wouldn't happen at this time of year, but anyway...

    With all of the stories about fairly shoddy recones done from JBL's Authorized Service and other places, I was wondering if any of you guys would like to take on a pair of 128' recones? R. Beardsley? Giskard?

    Would it help if I said "please"?

  4. #34
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Why don't you try to refoam them??? Take a look at this thread and look up Rick.

    http://audioheritage.csdco.com/vbull...read.php?t=469

    Rob

  5. #35
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Wash DC suburbs
    Posts
    1,215
    my first although only assisted refoam on 1 of my 128h-1. came with directions that did not need to cut the dust cap, centered using a 30hz tone. no problem even for a beginer, go for it, 25 bucks or so

    mark

  6. #36
    Senior Member LowPhreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurica, Inc.
    Posts
    702
    Thx for the tips guys. Maybe I'll give it a shot. But who's got the re-foam kits?

    How about these on eBay?: http://cgi.ebay.com/FOAM-SURROUND-RE...ayphotohosting

    Are they just some generic surrounds, or do I need to get the Genuine Article from JBL?

  7. #37
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Measure your cones edge to edge. Tell him the cone size and what woofers they are 128H-1 and you should be fine. His refoam kits are excellent. There are no genuine JBL refoam kits. JBL is recone only. These are black cone woofers??? If they are white they are 128H not -1. The cones can have slightly different diameters that's why you always measure them so they can be matched to the surrounds ID.

    mailto:[email protected]

    I just got a pair of 2108 surrounds from the same guy in your posted auction. They were a perfect fit. I didn't like how they were shipped in a soft bubble pack. I sent him an email and he said I was the first to suggest boxes and he never had a problem before. Looking at his feedback it's top notch.


    Rob

  8. #38
    Senior Member LowPhreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurica, Inc.
    Posts
    702
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    These are black cone woofers??? If they are white they are 128H not -1. The cones can have slightly different diameters that's why you always measure them so they can be matched to the surrounds ID.
    They're 128H-1's, black. Standard issue for 4412's I assume. (?)



    OK, well I'll check out the ones in the auction, and hopefully I won't make a mess of things.

  9. #39
    Senior Member LowPhreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurica, Inc.
    Posts
    702
    Quote Originally Posted by Robh3606 View Post
    Measure your cones edge to edge. Tell him the cone size and what woofers they are 128H-1 and you should be fine. ...The cones can have slightly different diameters that's why you always measure them so they can be matched to the surrounds ID.
    Another dumb Q, Rob: are you saying that all 128H-1 cones were not the same diameter and even knowing that these are -1's, I'll still have to measure them?

    Now why would JBL go and do that?

  10. #40
    Administrator Robh3606's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Rocinante
    Posts
    8,204
    Some of the 12" cones are not all the same size. Do they change in the same model number???? Not sure. When ever you go for a refoam kit you measure the cone. A 122A is larger than 128H-1 as an example. If l remember right the 128H white cone is also bigger OD wise. Look at the difference in the gap between the foam mounting pads.

    Rob
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  11. #41
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Just tell Rick what driver you have. If he has questions for you, he'll ask. I've done
    quite a few (entirely successful) refoams including 128H with his kits which are well packed;
    a recent 2214H set even survived the USPS postman's boot which crushed the center of
    the box. -grumpy

  12. #42
    Senior Member LowPhreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurica, Inc.
    Posts
    702
    Here's the offending culprit sans surround. The cone measured approx. 9 3/8", so should be no prob there.

    Using a screwdriver, I've scraped all of the foam & 99% of the glue from the basket edge, though it doesn't look so from this pic. I sanded the edge some to remove the glue, but didn't go radical down to the metal.

    Is it neccesary to remove all traces of old glue?



    ...and here's the foam on the back side of the cone's edge. On the right I've already started, but getting that last little bit off of the actual cone surface might not be easy. I think I'll very lightly sand the residue off after the bulk of the foam is removed, to get a good surface to bond to, but not sanding into the Aquaplas. (I hope!)

    Getting under those 4 wide spokes might be a bit tricky...



    Meanwhile, I get to play the L channel in mono until the new surrounds arrive.

  13. #43
    Senior Member LowPhreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurica, Inc.
    Posts
    702
    Just got this e-mail, in case it may help others in the future:

    Art,

    JBl made the 128 speakers with two slightly different cones. There is no way to tell which cone you have without measuring. Most of them have the slightly larger cone.

    Tom


    We'll see which is the "slightly larger" cone.


  14. #44
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    keep goin' dude. gaskets have to come off the frame too (carefully, if you expect to reuse
    them). I've used a sharp x-acto knife, then fingers for rolling deteriorated foam off of the back
    of the cone, then solvent. Different, wider/stiffer x-acto for the frame, then solvent.

    Helps to keep the knife clean. I take off all the glue on the frame and any loose paint. Others
    may have comments to complement the picture/story/example version here on the forum. I'd
    certainly be happy to learn a new or better technique, but I've been happy with the turnout
    thus far.

    -grumpy

  15. #45
    Senior Member LowPhreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurica, Inc.
    Posts
    702
    FWIW, on the cone diameter:

    Art,

    That would be the smaller diameter cone. ...

    Tom
    Meaning this 9 3/8" unit is the smaller version. I don't know if that's good or of no consequence. (The smaller dia. requires perhaps a wider or taller surround, and hence a bit more Xmax?) He didn't say what the larger diameter's size is.

    Here's the rear cone edge finished. Nice n' clean now. It was a tad fiddly getting under the spokes with a long screwdriver, especially the one over the tinsel leads, since the spokes are pretty low to the cone and wide, and nearly parallel to the basket's front plane.

    I held the front edge of the cone with fingers directly under where I was working and scraping off the foam, so as not to bend or tear the cone. The screwdriver head was the same width as the flat mounting area, so it worked well.

    Then I took some 80 Grit sandpaper and went around the flat area to remove the remnants of the foam. Just very lightly, and it didn't take much to clean it off.





    Thanks grumpy, I didn't know the gasket had to come off too! I thought there was room enough to work around it. I'll get to it after dinner...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Data Comparison: Stock vs. Aftermarket Recone 2245H Parameters
    By GordonW in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 12-20-2007, 05:27 PM
  2. Service advice for ReFoam AND Recone
    By briang in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 04-06-2005, 04:42 PM
  3. 123 recone
    By hector.murray in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-30-2005, 09:27 PM
  4. Recone le10 to 2123 - le15 to xxxx ?
    By gerard in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 11-07-2004, 04:12 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •