Results 1 to 15 of 64

Thread: 4430 help!

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Junior Member ricesinice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    12

    4430 help!

    I have been lurking around for a couple of weeks, and decided it was time to ask for some help. I have followed the 4430 quick and dirty thread but, it keeps going on tangents, and I have a couple of specific questions I would love to get answers for.

    I have made a pair of 4430 type clones but, I used my own 12db/oct. 1khz crossover based on the dcr of the drivers, and a driverack to eq them. When playing at louder volumes, they seem to be a bit harsh. So, I am wondering if I should try to clone the 4430 crossover (is this a 18dB/oct. for the HP) to see if they play a bit smoother or just roll my own 3rd order and let the driverack do the rest? I would just bi-amp it but, that would require another amp which is not in the budget yet.

    Thoughts to share?

    Thanks


  2. #2
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Tangents? What tangents?

    If you're using 2426H on 2344(A) horns, you need to clone the N3134 HP, at least, and the whole thing, HP & LP, if you're not biamping. Fortunately, that's easily accomplished.

    There's more than just EQ in there. You won't get true 4430 character and performance without it, at least not so far as we have yet been able to achieve in the "Quick & Dirty" project.

    I can only attribute it to "magic." Trust the Zilchster on this; it happens every time what I hook up using the factory crossover....

    I can't tell you unequivocally it's better biamped, either. Having the passive crossover is essential to that appoach as well. Virtually all of those components remain in operation when biamping.

    Your experience is well representative of that documented in the thread.

    My guess is that the DR is pushing the 2426H too hard. Look at the published distortion curves of 4430, particularly how it's climbing exponentialy at the high end. Crank up the boost in that region, and it's gonna get outta hand mighty quick.

    4430 operates at the limits of that 25-year-old technology, it seems. You have to stay within those limits for it to work. N3134 keeps you there and makes it happen in other ways, as well....

    Nice lookin' stack you've put together there, BTW!

  3. #3
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    YEP!



    Clone the 3134 and forget the driverack.

  4. #4
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by ricesinice
    When playing at louder volumes, they seem to be a bit harsh.
    I'm not sure just how loud you are playing them but the little 1" throat CD can be overdriven.

    Ditto what Guido said. Bias them too if so inclined.

  5. #5
    Junior Member ricesinice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    12
    If I were to clone the n3134 are R210,202 available? Did I see somewhere the mid point values for these somewhere?
    You are probably right about the Driverack, I used the speakers for a dance, and used it to eq the speakers flat...I was putting about 250 watts into each of these by the end of the night! The kids loved it but, I thought it sounded much better at about 3db less.

  6. #6
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    R201 is a linear wirewound exposed porcelain rheostat. It's N/C past 30 Ohms (28, on one of two here). In other crossovers (e.g., 4425,) JBL used the P section of an L-Pad for this.


    R202 is an 8-Ohm L-Pad. Center point is S=3.5, P=17.5. S=7 max., P=33 max. Non-standard?

    4430 "0" is 3:00 on R101, range -6 (9:00) to +2 dB, 12:00 on R202, range -11 (7:30) to +4 dB.

    You might be able to get the real things via JBL Pro Parts.

  7. #7
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,503
    Quote Originally Posted by ricesinice
    I was putting about 250 watts into each of these by the end of the night! The kids loved it but, I thought it sounded much better at about 3db less.
    Sounds like a party

  8. #8
    Senior Member Uncle Paul's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2005
    Location
    Oregon City, Oregon, USA
    Posts
    388
    R202 & R201 are in the miscellaneous parts list (N15-61390-1 & 54840). The inductors are still listed as well. Not sure if they are actually available, though.

    Does anybody know the part number for the 5 pole 2 position rotary switch or know of a suitable substitute?

  9. #9
    Junior Member ricesinice's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2005
    Location
    Massachusetts
    Posts
    12
    Well, sent mail to JBL parts to see if they have the pots, if so, I will try to go ahead and clone the crossover. I bid on one at ebay a couple of weeks ago but, it got too high for me oh well

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. monitor 4430 , the best ?
    By herve M in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 01-10-2005, 10:53 AM
  2. 2420 on 4430
    By gerard in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-24-2004, 06:51 PM
  3. 4430 crossovers
    By Figge in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-14-2004, 03:32 PM
  4. Measurements at 4430 Cabinet
    By Guido in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 33
    Last Post: 12-05-2003, 07:48 PM
  5. JBL 4430 vs 43XX balance argument
    By slxrti in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 11
    Last Post: 05-13-2003, 08:21 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •