Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 16

Thread: Input regarding the N110A

  1. #1
    Scooter
    Guest

    Input regarding the N110A

    I have been giving some thought as to how to proceed with the network that I am going to use with my L110s, and I decided on an "upgraded" N110A. Tentative plans call for Mundorf caps (not the Silvers--yet), 14 gauge air core inductors, and Eagle resistors. I have been advised to avoid low DCR inductors in the shunt portions of the mid and high sections of the x-over, as this will alter the circuits Q to a degree that can cause harshness in the tweeter. True? Is it better to stay with the original values in this section? Input appreciated.

    Scott

  2. #2
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    N110A

    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter
    I have been advised to avoid low DCR inductors in the shunt portions of the mid and high sections of the x-over, as this will alter the circuits Q to a degree that can cause harshness in the tweeter. True? Is it better to stay with the original values in this section? Input appreciated.
    Actually it is mandatory that you maintain the original DCR values of these special inductors.

    The DCR of L3 is ~ 7.5 ohms. L3 is actually an LR conjugate filter that reduces the effects of the LE5/subenclosure resonance characteristics.

    The DCR of L4 is ~ 7.5 ohms. L4 (as part of the LCR conjugate circuit) reduces the effects of the resonance characteristics of the 066.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. #3
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Impedance plots of LE5-9 in "standard" subenclosure with and without conjugate filters.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  4. #4
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    For those who might be interested -
    The N110A network can be used in the 4313B system as is.
    The N110A network can be used in the L96 system as long as the value of C5 is changed from 18 uF to 14 uF.
    Some might like to explore the differences between the various networks, how they impact the performances of the systems.

  5. #5
    Scooter
    Guest
    Thanks much Giskard. Glad I asked.

    Do you know the wire gauge of the inductors mentioned? I have the N110, but not sure if the A version is the same. I need this info to get a cost estimate from Madisound.

    Gratefully,

    Scott

  6. #6
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    No, I don't know the gauge off hand, I'd have to go measure them.
    I have quite a few of the 3.5 mH somewhere but very few of the 1.0 mH.
    Here's the N110 schematic for comparison.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  7. #7
    Scooter
    Guest
    I took a look at the coils corresponding to L3 and L4 on the N110 network, and the wire size is very small, which I now know one would expect with a relatively high resistance like this. L4 I would guess to be 24 ga. and L3 22 ga. However, Madisound says that they can wind as small as 26 ga., but that this will not be adequate for 7.5 ohms. So much for my guesses, I guess. Looks like the best course is to send them the N110s for salvage, and hope the coils are usable.

    Out of curiosity, if you were starting from scratch on the N110A crossover, and you did not have spare coils, or a way to obtain the winding of such small size for the 7.5 ohm requirement, what would you do for an improvise?

    Love those graphs! Thanks.

    Scott

  8. #8
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter
    Out of curiosity, if you were starting from scratch on the N110A crossover, and you did not have spare coils, or a way to obtain the winding of such small size for the 7.5 ohm requirement, what would you do for an improvise?
    I would use the smallest air core I could find and put a series resistor with it to get the required DCR (Solen Perfect Lay 20 AWG comes to mind). JBL did just that in later system designs.

  9. #9
    Senior Member DavidF's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Sonoma County CA
    Posts
    946
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter
    Out of curiosity, if you were starting from scratch on the N110A crossover, and you did not have spare coils, or a way to obtain the winding of such small size for the 7.5 ohm requirement, what would you do for an improvise?

    Scott
    Giskard suggestion is right on track. This gets you the same result as with the small-wire coil. You should not consider this a compromise. The reason to use the small wire winding is to combine the resistance and inductance in one piece for cost saving consideration.

    DavidF

  10. #10
    Scooter
    Guest
    The person at Madisound that I am consulting with thought that a series resistor might do it, but he seemed to dismiss this, as he felt the resistance should come from the coil itself. I will tell him to read this thread. Great advice as usual--and VERY much appreciated.

    Scott

  11. #11
    Scooter
    Guest
    Some further exchange on this subject has made me aware that when considering using a series resistor with e.g., a 20 ga. coil, that it is not just DCR, but AC impedance too, and that they do not react quite the same. Does someone have some insight on this? It was also pointed out that we do not know the actual values of the coils without measuring them (referring to my N110 network). So I think it best that I send them the networks for testing-- and some certainty. Scott

  12. #12
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter
    Does someone have some insight on this?
    Perhaps...
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  13. #13
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Ok.
    I took time out of my day to run this.

    Load is JBL Model LE5-12 in free air (Don't compare it to the graph above. I didn't feel like digging out a subenclosure today. The LE5-12 was just laying on the bench.)
    1st run is ubiquitous JBL 3.5 mH inductor with 7.5 ohms DCR.
    2nd run is JBL 3.5 mH inductor with 1.1 ohm DCR in series with a JBL 6.2 ohm resistor.

    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter
    So I think it best that I send them the networks for testing-- and some certainty.
    I think it's best you build the damn things yourself dude.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  14. #14
    Scooter
    Guest
    Giskard, you are truly a human Encylopedia 'O JBL!! You have my gratitude once more. Building the crossovers myself is my goal on the subsequent JBL project, whatever that may be. Still pillaging knowledge at this point.

    It feels like I have gotten myself in the middle of some disparity as to how to best proceed with this network... but some things are self-evident. Not a good place to be...people can get annoyed and pissed-off at you...makes for a "dividing" network.

    Scott

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    toronto
    Posts
    24
    Quote Originally Posted by Scooter View Post
    I have been giving some thought as to how to proceed with the network that I am going to use with my L110s, and I decided on an "upgraded" N110A. Tentative plans call for Mundorf caps (not the Silvers--yet), 14 gauge air core inductors, and Eagle resistors. I have been advised to avoid low DCR inductors in the shunt portions of the mid and high sections of the x-over, as this will alter the circuits Q to a degree that can cause harshness in the tweeter. True? Is it better to stay with the original values in this section? Input appreciated.

    Scott
    Did you end up doing this? And how did it work out? I was planning on upgrading my L110a caps to the Mundorf MCap evo oil. Looking at the size of the caps modification to the XO may be needed.

    For reference, the caps are:
    18.068uF : 10uF + 8.2uF = 18.2uF
    6.068uF : 5.6uF + 0.47uF = 6.07uF
    18.068uF : we use 10uF + 8.2uF = 18.2uF
    4.068uF : 3.9uF + 0.15 = 4.05uF
    16.568uF : 15uF + 0.68uF = 15.68uF

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Consumer and Pro-audio electronics: Connectivity
    By boputnam in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 53
    Last Post: 06-10-2007, 07:29 PM
  2. Class D amplification
    By hector.murray in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 02-21-2005, 09:10 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •