Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 22

Thread: Sub for 250ti

  1. #1
    FredEmmerich
    Guest

    Sub for 250ti

    Any recommendations on what would be a good sub for a 2 channel system with 250ti's? I know the B460 was available at the same time but I have not seen any of those available. Any newer subs worthwhile, of are the 250's good without one?

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Try a search for the new JBL 1500 sub.


    Ian

  3. #3
    Super Moderator jblnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Mass
    Posts
    900
    Quote Originally Posted by FredEmmerich
    Any recommendations on what would be a good sub for a 2 channel system with 250ti's? I know the B460 was available at the same time but I have not seen any of those available. Any newer subs worthwhile, of are the 250's good without one?

    Thanks
    I'm in the "they are good without one" camp. With enough power and a big enough room you can get tremendous bass out of them.

    jblnut

  4. #4
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    317
    I don't think you need a sub with them. They have useable response down to around 30 Hz and they seem to handle a lot of power even at the lower frequencies.

    I compared my 250Ti's to my father's big Polk SDA SRS 1.2's in the same room with the same amplifier and we were both shocked at how much more powerful and controlled the bottom end seemed on the 250Ti's. This comparison was made with a 200 watt per channel amp and about a 10 dB boost at 30 Hz. I did not notice any "bottoming out" and we were driving the speakers pretty hard.

    Mike

  5. #5
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Melbourne, Australia
    Posts
    55
    Search for the post "Noise from BX63" where there are several comments from me and others on the merits of single or multiple sub-woofers and the benefits you may/could/will achieve.

    I support others in suggesting the L250 don't require a sub-woofer for hi-fi.

    The frequency doubling of 'cheap' sub-woofers becomes so obvious that you will be very disappointed from a bargain basement approach.

    18 inch sub-woofers will damage your dry walls, shake all the ornaments, and generally upset your digestive system.

  6. #6
    Senior Member Don Mascali's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    Sarasota, Florida
    Posts
    494
    Quote Originally Posted by Ken Andrew
    18 inch sub-woofers will damage your dry walls, shake all the ornaments, and generally upset your digestive system.
    Yeah, ain't it great.

    Seriously the addition of the lower octave with out having to stress your amp makes a HUGE difference in the percieved impact and dynamic range of all types off music and the improvement with HT goes without saying. I vote for stereo subs, the idea of not localizing sounds doesn't account for the frequencies above the crossover point. None are steep enough to cut them out. IMHO
    4406, 4412A, L100, L100t3 (3 pair), L1, L7, 4645C, 4660A, 4695B, SR4735 and various DIY JBL Pro loaded systems.

  7. #7
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    A pair of these should do - HB5000

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    Central Coast California
    Posts
    9,042
    1600 peak W? Sweet.


    I guess 600W is the real number, still not too shabby.
    Out.

  9. #9
    Alex Lancaster
    Guest
    Actually 18 inchers are great for constipation .

  10. #10
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Actually, it can never hurt to add a pair of 15" 2235H driven B380's (in lieu of 18" B460) or Citation 7.4 equivalents (LE14H-1 or H-3 based) to most any system, and offload the VLF from the mains. JBL M552 24 dB/octave crossover, available lately on eBay for about $125, works nicely with it's /10 option engaged.

    Alternatively, use BX63(A) if you can find it (WAY pricey) or build one to get the programmed 6 dB LF boost it provides at 26 Hz for B380/460. It sums to mono for sub output, though, a common practice, but not necessarily the best. For that, use JBL 5235 with frequency cards of your choice (18 dB/octave 80 Hz is standard) and mod its built-in LPF boost to 26 Hz. [Note: 4645C wants that, too.... ]

    Power with JBL 6260 amp, also for $125 - $150 on eBay, and $60 worth of balanced line cables from the proaudio shop to tie it all together.

    My system controller has sub outputs (summed mono, alas,) but no facility to remove the VLF from the mains that I can find, so the external crossover gives me the desired control. PLUS, it has a bunch of knobs and buttons for me to mess with.

  11. #11
    mrbluster
    Guest
    I have a B460 as well as experience with quite a few lesser subwoofers. IMO with something like the 250's you would be moving backwards to add an "average sub" whether you rolled off your mains or not. I would focus on applying the best possible amplfication to your 250ti's and If still not satisfied, only then would I consider adding to the lowest octave with a very good subwoofer like the B460.

  12. #12
    RIP 2011 Zilch's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2004
    Location
    Berkeley, CA
    Posts
    9,963
    Can we agree that a pair of B380's is not "lesser" to a single B460?

  13. #13
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Best practice is to run at least two subs.

    For music playback the 250Ti's shouldn't require subs at all. For DVD playback subs can enhance the experience. I've done the L250's and 250Ti's with single and dual B380's and B460's in a variety of rooms. More often than not, the subs were left turned off.

    As for stock Citation 7.4's or PS1400's, they're too small for L250's or 250Ti's. Build custom boxes with the same volume and tuning as the L250/250Ti if you're going to use LE14H-1's or LE14H-3's. Nice alternative suggestion there Zilch. Smaller boxes than either the B380 or B460, similar bandwidth, and only 3rd order instead of 5th order VLF roll-off.

  14. #14
    Super Moderator jblnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Mass
    Posts
    900
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch
    Actually, it can never hurt to add a pair of 15" 2235H driven B380's (in lieu of 18" B460) or Citation 7.4 equivalents (LE14H-1 or H-3 based) to any system, and offload the VLF from the mains.
    I'm not sure I know where you are coming from here. Why "offload" the bass from the LE14H-1's in the 250Ti just to send it to a different pair of the same ? Although I can't fathom it myself, I guess I can see someone adding a sub to some 250's with the purpose of getting a little more seismic activity. But that would only be for the sub-30hz region.

    What would be the gain of crossing the 250's over (actively I assume) and sending the bass somewhere else ? Wouldn't that in essence waste the 250's superb capability for bass ?

    Just curious....

    jblnut

    PS - Is it just me or are people not using enough power or space to hear their 250's properly ? My walls are still hurting from this weekend's amp testing session featuring Stevie Wonder's "Boogie on Reggae Woman" .

  15. #15
    mrbluster
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Zilch
    Can we agree that a pair of B380's is not "lesser" to a single B460?
    Absolutely, and when you factor in placement flexibility and "room" issues, they may be superior.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •