Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 18

Thread: "Worst refoam job EVER" -rescue project

  1. #1
    Senior Member Flodstroem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    472

    "Worst refoam job EVER" -rescue project

    hello

    Does anyboby remember a thread from our friend Wsilva
    "Worst refoam job EVER"

    This image was attached to his post (a picture of a severe refoamed 136A
    )
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Flodstroem

  2. #2
    Steve Gonzales
    Guest

    oh yeah ?

    It's a tie if anything

  3. #3
    Senior Member Flodstroem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    472

    a rescue operation

    Now, I got te opportunity to re-cone this pair 136A. This meant I had to cut away the old cone assambly and so on.

    I started to cut avay the "foam super heavy delux micro bass" When finnished with that job (guess what a job, 4 different type of glue) I could see the cones was pretty fine and there was absolutely no rubbing scraping or other bad sounds from the voice coils.

    I started to thinking re-foaming instead of re-coning.
    To make this storie not to long, this was the results after that "thinking"
    A rescued pair of 136A

    a close-up of new foam:
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Flodstroem

  4. #4
    Steve Gonzales
    Guest

    Great Job!

    You are good!

  5. #5
    Senior Member Flodstroem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    472

    -A new pair of 136A

    And this is a close-up of one of the two speakers
    regards
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Flodstroem

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,110
    Very Nice Flodstroem

    I truly think that you have "Mastered" this refoaming technique .

    I'm glad to see all this restoration effort going on .

    Now I'd like to see you "create" a new HiFi speaker out of available R&R stock.

    Take (2) 2225s / cut out the linen surround / install Rick Cobbs' foam surrounds and you have created a 137H ( my designtion for a 136H without the "mass-ring" ). This would be the shorter coil predecessor to a 2234H .
    ( Fs ?, maybe in the 26 to 31 hz range )


    EarlK , ( "Living vicariously" through all your efforts )

  7. #7
    Alex Lancaster
    Guest
    And I thought Earl was an Ultra-Purist

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,110
    And I thought Earl was an Ultra-Purist

    Ha, Ha, Ha,

    I guess I forgot to take my "politically correct pills" this morning .

  9. #9
    Steve Gonzales
    Guest

    Solvent

    What did you use to remove the GUNK? MEK?

  10. #10
    Senior Member Flodstroem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    472

    2225 hybrid "Earl K Special"

    Hello all, thanks for comments
    Yes Earl K I will fix that, send parts to me and we will see what I will come upp with. Kidding, I live in Norway and it will be an expensiv shipping.

    When looking in the JBL T/S parameter list I can see the cone assamblys mass is 105grams. It is slightly heavier than the LE15/2215 cone assambly.
    Taking that to account a new 2225/foam surounder would have a new Fs in the order of 23-27 Hz not as high as you thougt. This is only a guessing based only to the 2225´s moving mass. If 2225 magnet have a higher Tesla (stronger magnet motor) than the LE15/2215H, and a stiffer spider then Fs could be as high as you propose.

    Regards
    Flodstroem

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,110
    Hi Flodstroem

    then Fs could be as high as you propose. If 2225 magnet have a higher Tesla (stronger magnet motor) than the LE15/2215H,
    - It's 1.2 Tesla vs .9 Tesla ( brand new alnico ) for the 2225h vs a le15a

    and a stiffer spider
    - The 2225h spider is ( I think ) 2 spider stiffnesses more than the le15a ( which is quite flimsy )

    then Fs could be as high as you propose.
    - Yes, that's why my guess was higher than even a 2234

    - In fact, the cone may need some ( home-made) aquaplas (weight ) to get the best Fs & "smooth" midrange performance .

    - This all applies to the 2226 which would have a "better" Xmax ( but really at my age ) whos' after Xmax Ha Ha




  12. #12
    Senior Member Flodstroem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    472

    Remove "GUNK" ?????

    Hi Steve

    What did you use to remove the GUNK? MEK?
    No I didn´t use that or any other solvent to get rid of the GUNK. The GUNK that was most of used to fix the "surround" to the cone was silicone. There is no solvent that kan solve silicone. There is only one way to do it: the hard way which means: MECHANICAL (phhhuuuuuuu)

    Good luck Steve with that speaker (eg. the whitish one)
    regards
    Flodstroem

  13. #13
    Super Moderator yggdrasil's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Våle, Norway
    Posts
    1,014
    Very nice job.

    Rålekkert.
    Johnny Haugen Sørgård

  14. #14
    transducergeek
    Guest

    As a Norwegian-American, how do you pronounce that?

    Quote Originally Posted by yggdrasil
    Very nice job.

    Rålekkert.
    Is is "Rol-eh-Curt?" or? I am born/raised California, and know nothing of the Norge lingo.... I assume it means, "excellent" or "great"... ? Thanks.. Rolf E.

  15. #15
    Senior Member Flodstroem's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2004
    Location
    Norway
    Posts
    472

    Thank´s all for comments

    But back to the interesting 2225 Earl K Sub ("2225EKSub")

    Earl K, the specs 1.2 Tesla and 0.9 Tesla you mention is from (I guess) the JBL´s T/S parameter list. This spec is given to the "flux density"(eg. Tesla or Gauss), not the "total magnetic flux" (eg. Maxwells or Weber) which was what I meant but couldn´t explain so clear.

    Its means it is not for sure that the total magnetic flux in a 2225 is higher than in a LE15/2215 (H). The magnetic assembly differs (only?) in the top plate thickness. (if compare 2225H with a 2215H) what I can see. Thats also why the higher "flux density" in the 2225´s magnetic gap.

    I think the total magnetic flux is the main factor which controls the Fs in a speaker. Maybe Giskard is the person who knows anything about the magnets in these speakers ?

    This mean the only differance between the 2225 and the LE15/2215 (H) is mass of cone and stiffness of spider, if we dont count legth of voice coil, or turns or cone materials and handling power (if I´m not totaly wrong).

    Heavier cone mass will (maybe) out-balance the stiffer spider in the 2225. I think we will end up with a loudspeaker that has an Fs narrower to the 26 Hz value rather than the 31 Hz value (which is a big differance compared to the original Fs at 40 Hz).

    (D..n, I would like to test this. I have foam surrounds but I dont have any 2225 in stock . )

    This "Rålekkert" was from my Norwegian friend and was a litle bit of off topics, but any way, Thank´s.

    Regards
    Flodstroem

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Worst refoam job EVER!!!!!!!!
    By wsilva in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 10
    Last Post: 05-21-2004, 08:13 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •