Quote Originally Posted by Ian Mackenzie View Post
It’s a bit technical.

In simple terms a passive crossover in this particular loudspeaker design would cause significant power losses in the crossover, loss of damping on the woofers and the mid cone. The motional impedance of the mid cone and woofer may interact causing sub optimal voltage drives in the crossover region. The effect is modulation of the voltage drive and muddle sound.

Bi amping eliminates the problem and allows a significant improvement in dynamic range and clarity.

If you were to attempt a passive crossover it would be expensive and disappointing compared to bi amping
Definitely beyond my understanding but I trust your knowledge. I don't have the ability to design a passive network, it was more of a "I wish" statement. I hated biamping my factory 4350's, it complicates everything and there is a lot more cables running about. I have a DEQX and Bryston 10B to handle the split but will require another SS amp for bass duty.

Still excited for the build.