Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: Woofers ruined or no?.

  1. #1
    Member clwinbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    62

    Woofers ruined or no?.

    I’ve restored many JBL speakers over the years. I’ve always used a guy here in Utah that’s been working on JBL drivers for 40 years. He’s taken woofers that looked like a lost cause and brought them back to “museum” grade. He’s an artist. All of the JBL woofers that he’s done always has the proper surround glued to the rear of the cone.

    im seeing a bunch of JBL raw speakers and mounted in cabinets that appear to have the foam surrounds glued to the front of the cone. I would think this would be done to try and hide damage done from trying to clean off the old foam. Some of the work is really shoddy. I’ve bought many 708g-1 woofers that had been butchered, then my guy fixes them.

    Is the foam attachment location a factor for proper woofer operation? It’s really upsetting to see a fine speaker hacked by a “I think I can do it” owner.

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,863
    It's harder to put them on the rear of the cone.

  3. #3
    Senior Member HCSGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    752
    Re-foaming on the front wrecks the value of the driver, but generally not the performance. I would worry about it on a driver with an underhung voice coil, especially a small driver like a 2108, but that’s a pretty rare bird. I sold off some LE14H-1’s that had been re-foamed on the front a few years ago for $175each. If they had been properly re-foamed on the back of the cone, it would have been more like $250 at the time, and over $300 now. Make sure it’s done right.
    That the internet contains a blog documenting your life does not constitute proof that your existence is valid. Sorry.

  4. #4
    Senior Member Chris Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by clwinbe View Post
    Is the foam attachment location a factor for proper woofer operation?
    Absolutely. The magnet has a gap, in which the voice coil operates. The resting position of the voice coil, which is attached to the rear-center of the cone, is obviously influenced by the surround foam. When you put the foam on the front instead of the rear, you are changing the resting position of the cone, pushing the cone (and the voice coil) inward by several millimeters at least.

    Consider the "XMax" specification. This variable represents the maximum limit of cone travel while the voice coil is still properly within the magnet gap. The voice coil (or part of the voice coil) can leave the magnetic gap, but distortion rises quickly at that point. Most woofers have an XMax in the range of 4-8 millimeters. Every millimeter matters. So while the tiny distance that the cone is pushed inward due to an improper refoam might seem trivial, it does actually matter.

    Further consideration would be the "XMech" specification. XMech is a superset of XMax. While XMax represents the maximum extent of cone travel while the voice coil is still properly within the magnet gap, XMech represents the absolute maximum limit of cone travel. With most woofers, XMech would be defined as when the voice coil slams into the pole piece of the magnet, letting out a very loud "POP!". While exceeding XMax can result in additional distortion, reaching XMech can result in physical damage to the voice coil. By putting the foam on the front, you are pushing the cone inward, reducing the XMech of the woofer in most cases.

  5. #5
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffW View Post
    It's harder to put them on the rear of the cone.
    can't agree with that ... for me , rear is easier.

    on the front , you have to push foam onto cone while drying

    on the rear, I weigh down the cone a bit , so it's pushing into the foam.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,863
    Quote Originally Posted by SEAWOLF97 View Post
    can't agree with that ... for me , rear is easier.
    There's gotta be some reason they're sticking them on the front...

  7. #7
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by JeffW View Post
    There's gotta be some reason they're sticking them on the front...
    because most other makers do. JBL does too on some car ones.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  8. #8
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,742
    Rip and strip. It's much faster, much less training/expertise. End of story. Shop saves $$, customer may also.
    Until recone kits disappeared, this was just a band-aid to prolong service less expensively.

    Context: Yes, I got burned once, and I'm still pissed off about it.

    ... I should also reiterate that many drivers have their surrounds attached to the front by design... including some of the the older LE14 models (IIRC).
    Last edited by grumpy; 12-16-2020 at 12:54 PM. Reason: clarification

  9. #9
    Member clwinbe's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2017
    Location
    Utah
    Posts
    62
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
    Rip and strip. It's much faster, much less training/expertise. End of story. Shop saves $$, customer may also.
    Until recone kits disappeared, this was just a band-aid to prolong service less expensively.

    Context: Yes, I got burned once, and I'm still pissed off about it.

    ... I should also reiterate that many drivers have their surrounds attached to the front by design... including some of the the older LE14 models (IIRC).
    I hate when that happens. My guy has saved six woofers that were butchered by eBay folks. Find your happy place.....breath.....Bastards

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    3,597
    Quote Originally Posted by SEAWOLF97 View Post
    because most other makers do. JBL does too on some car ones.

    JBL does this on a lot of stuff now, including the new L100 classics (butyl rubber), though it would seem than much of this technology has trickled down from their "professional" automotive line.

    Putting the foams on the front, where designed for rear installation, can also limit the cone's travel and ultimately, its maximum volume level.

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,863
    Still puzzles me why anybody would take a driver that had the surround on the rear of the cone and stick a new one on the front of the cone because other mfgs or even other JBL drivers were done that way. Seems like if it came in with surround on the rear, it should go out with surround on the rear.

  12. #12
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,742
    Again... cheaper/faster, but not better. Usually.
    Sometimes the backside has already been trashed or bad glue used.
    Should be a last resort though.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. My cat ruined the fabric of my Altec Lansing Model 19
    By CBHR in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 03-02-2018, 01:07 PM
  2. Ruined dustcap 2206h
    By badman in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 02-28-2013, 07:14 PM
  3. LE15A - Look at Ruined Voice Coil
    By Val in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 08-12-2005, 09:46 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •