Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: 2234H, 2235H, and Mass Controlling Rings

  1. #1
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885

    Post 2234H, 2235H, and Mass Controlling Rings

    From a post by PSS AUDIO in this thread:

    http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...=2742#post2721

    ”What do you mean by removing the mass rings from the 2235?

    Can you give me/us information about it?”


    A 2235H has a 35 gram mass controlling ring centered at the apex of the cone at the top of the voice coil former as shown in the attached photo:
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  2. #2
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885

    Post 2234H, 2235H, and Mass Controlling Rings

    A 2234H is a 2235H without the mass controlling ring:

    The effects of this reduction in mass can be seen by inspecting the Thiele/Small Parameters of both transducers:
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  3. #3
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885

    Post 2234H, 2235H, and Mass Controlling Rings

    Some people feel that by leaving the mass controlling ring out of the 2235H, and thereby creating a 2234H, they end up with a better sounding transducer. In reality, the 2235H and 2234H are both extremely viable transducers with different loading requirements. Depending on application, one would be preferred over the other. They are not technically interchangable. e.g. If you pull a 2235H out of a 4430 and put a 2234H in instead, the result will be less than ideal.

    The only production JBL loudpseaker system that I know of which used the 2234H is the 4435 Studio Monitor. These links might be of interest:

    http://www.jblpro.com/pages/components/2235h.htm

    http://www.lansingheritage.org/html/...81-4430-35.htm

    http://www.jblpro.com/pub/obsolete/443035.pdf

    http://www.jblpro.com/pub/technote/tn_v3n01.pdf

  4. #4
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885

    Post 2234H, 2235H, and Mass Controlling Rings

    Here are graphs showing the 2234H and 2235H in free air. It is easy to see the results of a change in effective moving mass. Note that all other physical aspects of the 2235H transducer are held constant, only the mass controlling ring is removed to create a 2234H.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  5. #5
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885

    Post 2234H, 2235H, and Mass Controlling Rings

    The following graphs illustrate how one particular software package interprets the Thiele/Small parameters of the 2234H and 2235H to arrive at what it considers to be the proper vented enclosure volume and tuning for each transducer to provide maximally flat response:
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #6
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885

    Post 2234H, 2235H, and Mass Controlling Rings

    Finally -

    The 2234H and 2235H in a 5.0 cubic foot enclosure tuned to 30 Hz as recommended here:

    http://www.jblpro.com/pub/manuals/enclgde.pdf
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  7. #7
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,513
    Wow!!!

    One Question left:

    From the graphs there is not soooo much difference.

    Why could we not use the 2234 instead of a 2235?
    BLS Reference on Passlabs XA 30.5 + Everest DD66000 clone on Pass XA 100.5

  8. #8
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885
    Oh that's just Great!
    Make fun of the crappy resolution of my little graphs!

    If you look at the Normalized Amplitude Response in the 5.0 cubic foot volume tuned to 30 Hz you will notice roughly a 20 Hz difference in the 3 dB downpoint between the 2234H and the 2235H, meaning the 2235H is enjoying a 20 Hz extension over the 2234H in this particular situation. At 6 dB down the difference shrinks to roughly 5 Hz. Another way to look at it is the 2234H will require almost twice the power input to reproduce low E on electric bass in order to match the output of the 2235H.

    BTW, the response of the 2234H in this situation is more along the lines of the type of bass response popular in Japan.

  9. #9
    Senior Member Guido's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    2,513
    Youre right like always!

    6dB difference is more than not soooo much.

    And all becuse of the small massring.

    Thank you
    BLS Reference on Passlabs XA 30.5 + Everest DD66000 clone on Pass XA 100.5

  10. #10
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885
    Here's how Winspeakerz interprets the 2234H and 2235H T/S parameters in 5.0 cubic feet tuned to 30 Hz:
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Last edited by 4313B; 07-03-2003 at 03:42 AM.

  11. #11
    Senior Member sa660's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Ireland
    Posts
    221

    2234 Vs 2235

    Giskard.

    I do not understand how you can see 6dB difference at 5hz and only 3dB difference a 20Hz

    I was thinking of buying a pair of 2234 to place them in a pair of 4628B and use the E145 for other application. A long time project is the harsfield.

    The volume is 5cu-ft and the efficiency is very close.

    Can you comment on this?
    Regards,
    Richard,
    JBL 2450+JBL E145

  12. #12
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,885

    Re: 2234 Vs 2235

    "I do not understand how you can see 6dB difference at 5hz and only 3dB difference a 20Hz"

    Hello sa660,

    Here's what I said:

    "you will notice roughly a 20 Hz difference in the 3 dB downpoint between the 2234H and the 2235H"

    Explained another way, the 3 dB downpoint of the 2234H occurs at ~ 56 Hz and the 3 dB downpoint of the 2235H occurs at ~ 36 Hz. That's a difference of 20 Hz giving the 2235H a 20 Hz extension into the VLF region.

    "At 6 dB down the difference shrinks to roughly 5 Hz"

    The 6 dB downpoint of the 2234H occurs at ~ 34 Hz while the 2235H has it's 6 dB downpoint at ~ 30 Hz. Therefore I was in error. The difference is 4 Hz instead of 5 Hz.
    Last edited by 4313B; 07-04-2003 at 01:26 PM.

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Westlake HR-1's are now home
    By Ken Pachkowsky in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 63
    Last Post: 07-21-2003, 01:42 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •