Colleagues;
is the 052 subject to the same foam damping problems as the 035?
May be Steve you are getting the 035 deterioratd foam undamped zinggies.
Ed
Colleagues;
is the 052 subject to the same foam damping problems as the 035?
May be Steve you are getting the 035 deterioratd foam undamped zinggies.
Ed
KEEP ON LISTENING!
Interesting point. You may be onto something.Originally Posted by Ed Kreamer
Has anyone opened one of these up?
Widget
The first configuration was all Adcom, GFP-565 and GFA-555, the second configuration was a Brooklyn Bridge and an Adcom GFA-555, the third configuration was a Brooklyn DAC+ and an Adcom GFA-555, all had 'flabby' bass.Of course this begs the question: "What were you using for amplification during your flabby period?"
The 4412A is a very good studio monitor and holds back very little, even including distortion and breakup from your source, your stylus, a bad recording, etc. I do not find them irritating on clean source material but older LPs or early CDs have me searching for better recordings.
The present configuration is a Brooklyn DAC+ and a Bryston 4B. The bass is precise.
The Bryston and titanium tweeters seem not to be an optimum combination. The treble is a bit sharp at times, depending on the material.
OK , you finally got good bass from them.
I had 4412's ( not "A") and didn't care for the bass that I was getting using a big BGW 750D.
Glad you solved the problem , but if you have to experiment with amps to get it right , can't (to me) consider that a successful speaker design.
Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles
Wolf, do you hate the 128H-1 in general, or only in these small boxes?
". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers
NO.
I've had them in other boxes/xovers and they were fine.
Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote