Need Info on K2 S9500

[stevem]

I read that the woofer enclosures for the K2 S9500 are two different volume sizes, tuned to two different frequencies. Does anyone know what the volumes and tuning frequencies are? I understand that they are different (smaller) than those used in the M95000 (which someone has already posted).

Also, is the owner's manual available anywhere online for the S9500? Thanks!

[Don C]

Here is the owner's manual at the JBL site.
http://manuals.harman.com/JBL/HOM/Ow...S9500%20om.pdf

[stevem]

Thanks, I got the manual!

[Niklas Nord]

Hello Steve

I own the s9500 and can tell that the cabs are different.
not much, but different in size they are indeed. The M9500
is either bigger in size, though they look smaller than my s9500
or they are an EBS configuration, tuned lower than "alowed"
for in room response..

I would also be very interested in this matter, if there is anybody
that knows how many liters of cubic feet they are couse I´m interested
in maybe plug the ports couse I run them only from 120hz.

I could measure them, but they are not only 4 sides to measure

Why did you wanna know this?

Niklas

[Jan Daugaard]

The enclosures of the M9500 are as follows:

78 litres (2.8 cu ft) 35 Hz tuning (upper LF)
115 litres (4.1 cu ft) 28 Hz tuning (lower LF)

These numbers have been culled from the file M9500 om.pdf

[stevem]

Hello Steve

I could measure them, but they are not only 4 sides to measure

Why did you wanna know this?

Niklas

I have two pairs of 1401Nd woofers (the same as the 1400Nd, except with a black pebble paint job). I am using a pair each in a single vented enclosure that I want to divide into two sub-chambers. Before I just divide the box into two equal halves, I would like to consider using two different tunings as JBL did with both the S9500 and the larger M95000. My enclosure is smaller than the M95000, So I wanted to check out the S9500.

Also, Thanks Jan for the info on the M95000. Now if I can just get the same thing for the K2 S9500 I'll be in business!

[4313B]

You really, honestly, truly don't need the information for the S9500.

Jan Daugaard is correct - the M9500 data is the data to use.

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
POTENTIALLY PERTINENT INFORMATION DELETED


-------------------------------------------------------------------------