Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: Lifting the Veil from the 2405

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    3,604

    Lifting the Veil from the 2405

    When I built the crossovers in my modified L200/300s, the system was using LE175s on the short horns and 075s as the tweeters. I modified the L200 Studio Master and we came up with "Zilch tested and approved" the "Keeper Crossovers."

    These used the a variation of the N7000/N8000 circuit for the high frequencies substituting a 0.5mH choke in place of the 0.7mH choke in the N7000 and 0.2 mH choke in the N8000. Let's call it a second order ~7,300 Hz.

    The problem was that the 075 was so "hot" that I could never turn the L-pad up past ~1/4-1/3 of the way without the sound becoming too bright. At Zilch recommendation, I added the two resistors as a voltage divider (don't recall the values), and this knocked the 075s down to where the L-pad became useful throughout its range.

    The 075s were later replaced by 2405s. Of course these are much quieter than the 075s and with the crossover components now hot glued in place on the circuit boards, it would be difficult to remove the voltage divider. I would typically run with the 2405 "wide open" just to get a decent match.

    But with lots of listening and A/Bing with other speakers, I knew that I was missing the high highs and even though the voltage dividers should attenuate all frequencies similarly. Particually what was missing was the "tink" of the ride cybols, etc. Yes, I know that you hear it with the 2405, but until you can instaneously compare them with other offerings, you just don't know what you are missing.

    I wanted a circuit that I could apply externally to the speakers (I can access the driver wires from the back at the crossovers) without opening them up, at least to develop it.

    This is what I came up with. It adds a very high pass, 1st order filter to the existing 2nd order filter to flatten out the higher range. Because the 1st order is connected directly to the speaker, it doesn't pass through the L-pad windings and thus attenuates at a much slower rate. The 2nd order attenuates because the L-pad selects less voltage to go to the speaker AND the speaker goes to ground. The 1st order only attenuates because the speaker goes to ground.

    All caps are Solen Fast Caps with AuraCap Theta 0.10 By-pass caps riding piggyback. All resistors are Mills.


  2. #2
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by toddalin View Post
    When I built the crossovers in my modified L200/300s, the system was using LE175s on the short horns and 075s as the tweeters. I modified the L200 Studio Master and we came up with "Zilch tested and approved" the "Keeper Crossovers."

    These used the a variation of the N7000/N8000 circuit for the high frequencies substituting a 0.5mH choke in place of the 0.7mH choke in the N7000 and 0.2 mH choke in the N8000. Let's call it a second order ~7,300 Hz.

    The problem was that the 075 was so "hot" that I could never turn the L-pad up past ~1/4-1/3 of the way without the sound becoming too bright. At Zilch recommendation, I added the two resistors as a voltage divider (don't recall the values), and this knocked the 075s down to where the L-pad became useful throughout its range.

    The 075s were later replaced by 2405s. Of course these are much quieter than the 075s and with the crossover components now hot glued in place on the circuit boards, it would be difficult to remove the voltage divider. I would typically run with the 2405 "wide open" just to get a decent match.

    But with lots of listening and A/Bing with other speakers, I knew that I was missing the high highs and even though the voltage dividers should attenuate all frequencies similarly. Particually what was missing was the "tink" of the ride cybols, etc. Yes, I know that you hear it with the 2405, but until you can instaneously compare them with other offerings, you just don't know what you are missing.

    I wanted a circuit that I could apply externally to the speakers (I can access the driver wires from the back at the crossovers) without opening them up, at least to develop it.

    This is what I came up with. It adds a very high pass, 1st order filter to the existing 2nd order filter to flatten out the higher range. Because the 1st order is connected directly to the speaker, it doesn't pass through the L-pad windings and thus attenuates at a much slower rate. The 2nd order attenuates because the L-pad selects less voltage to go to the speaker AND the speaker goes to ground. The 1st order only attenuates because the speaker goes to ground.

    All caps are Solen Fast Caps with AuraCap Theta 0.10 By-pass caps riding piggyback. All resistors are Mills.

    Hi todd,
    I think R1 has to be on the other side of R2
    L1 about 0.1mH, so maximum round 21kHz
    no idea for R3, R4, say R3=R4=10.....
    but using 2405 i think that it would be better to use one capacitor more, C3, between L2 and R3 saying C1=1uF, C3=2uF, L2=0.16mH....

    regards
    ivica

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    3,604
    Hi,

    Thanks for looking. I've tried both ways and it seems to make no difference on the Berringer 61-band and the ear can't readily hear a difference.

    You also need to consider that the 2nd order though the L-pad also goes to ground through R1, so R2 adds another 2 ohms of isolation between the two stages that wouldn't be there if R1 was on the other side (my original throught).

    In fact, I was worried that when the L-pad is turned to "0" that this would short out the amp. But the 0.56 mfd cap takes care of this and it has not been a problem, even without a resistor. When I tried a 1.2 ohm value here, I kept coming back to the 2 ohm value as it sounded a bit better to my ear. If someone is concerned, the 2 ohm value for R2 can be increased considerably without consequence. You need at least 8 ohms in here before you see any real difference in dB on the meter.

    R3 and R4 are already in place and will be determined after these other values are finalized and the box is opened.

    Adding cap C3 is essentally the L300 network except that it would be 1.5 mfd and C1 would be 1 mfd and IIRC, the choke is 0.18mH. This creates a spike in the area of the depression that is inherent in the ring radiators. But it also further reduces the volume and would require that I go into the networks and remove the hot glue that basically "pots" the network. Then there are those (e.g., Nelson Pass) that feel that the tweeter sounds more natual without the double cap spike.

    I am trying to add volume in the upper reaches while "thinking outside of the box" both figureatively and literally.

  4. #4
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by toddalin View Post
    Hi,

    Thanks for looking. I've tried both ways and it seems to make no difference on the Berringer 61-band and the ear can't readily hear a difference.

    You also need to consider that the 2nd order though the L-pad also goes to ground through R1, so R2 adds another 2 ohms of isolation between the two stages that wouldn't be there if R1 was on the other side (my original throught).

    In fact, I was worried that when the L-pad is turned to "0" that this would short out the amp. But the 0.56 mfd cap takes care of this and it has not been a problem, even without a resistor. When I tried a 1.2 ohm value here, I kept coming back to the 2 ohm value as it sounded a bit better to my ear. If someone is concerned, the 2 ohm value for R2 can be increased considerably without consequence. You need at least 8 ohms in here before you see any real difference in dB on the meter.

    R3 and R4 are already in place and will be determined after these other values are finalized and the box is opened.

    Adding cap C3 is essentally the L300 network except that it would be 1.5 mfd and C1 would be 1 mfd and IIRC, the choke is 0.18mH. This creates a spike in the area of the depression that is inherent in the ring radiators. But it also further reduces the volume and would require that I go into the networks and remove the hot glue that basically "pots" the network. Then there are those (e.g., Nelson Pass) that feel that the tweeter sounds more natual without the double cap spike.

    I am trying to add volume in the upper reaches while "thinking outside of the box" both figureatively and literally.
    Hi todd,

    Yesterday I have done some network simulation, and it has shown that LF attenuation is not so good for 2405 (behaved almost as -26dB/dec as the first order network, so I have suggested C3 to be introduced).
    Using JBL standard 2405 network 1uF, 1.8uF, 0.12mH, and adding about the same L=0.12mH 'in-series' to the rest (L_pad and attenuation) almost the same HF peaking round 20kHz can be get.....

    regards
    ivica

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Jul 2003
    Location
    Orange County, CA
    Posts
    3,604
    Thanks,

    It would be an interesting excercize for someone with an N7000/N8000/equivelent on the 2402/2404/2405 to add this circuit to see the outcome recognizing that there would be some tweaking involved with the resistor values and turning of the L-pad to get the best sound.

    Again, lots of people have access to the amplifier input to the speaker box and the wire output to the drivers/tweeter, but nothing else. This saves getting into the box and messing with the existing circuit, which may be potted.

    Certainly simple enough to try for some who probably have all of these parts lying around.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    I played around with it in LEAP using 2405 modelling amplitude and impedance minimum phase transformation.

    Its a touchy little sucker but you can get one nice bump instead of spikes

    Seeing as you are using the 2405 with another driver it's best to see how they work together and you seem to have done that subjective. That's the only way.

    Let me know if you want to see the curve

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. old Westlake after lifting
    By Darstas in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 09-03-2015, 02:16 AM
  2. 2405 vs 077
    By mvaldes in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 11-14-2005, 11:40 AM
  3. 2405 or 077
    By Uncle Paul in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-28-2005, 11:40 AM
  4. How to lift the "veil" from my L-300s???
    By Tweak48 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 11-01-2004, 06:09 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •