Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Real advantage of Alnico motors?

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Germany / Hamburg
    Posts
    659

    Real advantage of Alnico motors?

    Hi,

    Iīve started my JBL journey years ago with old alnico horndrivers and finally ended up with the equalent ferrite versions, because most of the used alnicoīs had significant magnet loss over the years...
    Many on this forum say a 2445 motor will sound exactly like a 2440 with the same diaphragm installed.

    Now my question:
    Why do companyīs such as JBL and TAD use the more expensive and heat fragile motors on their woofers again these days??
    What is the advantage in real life of these?
    For example TAD has the very expensive 1601b woofers with alnico motor and the 1603 ferrite version. Both share the identical cone/spider. There is no significant difference in Flux densitiy or BL strengh etc... But a hefty 400$ more for the alnico version....
    So is it high-end vodoo marketing or a real benefit?

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,863

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Germany / Hamburg
    Posts
    659
    Thanks a lot, that is a great link!

    So far Iīve understood that a modern, well designed Alnico motor should be in advantage.

    The demagnetization of an Alnico motor has to be taken care of!
    In case of the JBL 1500AL this is the case.
    What about the TAD 1601b and 1602 etc.... there designs are decades old!

  4. #4
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,734
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.db View Post
    ? . . . What about the TAD 1601b and 1602 etc.... there designs are decades old!
    The 1601b and ferrite 1603 use the same high-temp voice coil. What is the reason the 1603 exists if, as GT says, the costs of Alnico and ferrite motor production leveled very soon after the political situation around cobalt was relieved?

    I've used the 1601b and 1601 with a 1603 cone kit. They sound the same.

    I've used the 1602. It sounds different and is much preferred. Actually Don mentioned that very thing. The 1602 was phased out because of the warranty cost in studios where some customers, e.g. rappers, were not happy with the bass unless their pant legs were flapping. Are we seeing history repeated with the arrival of the 1501Al-2 and JBL's refusal to make the earlier versions of the cone and reluctance to make the -2 cone kit available?

    I argued once that based on TAD's description the 1602 is underhung, therefore there is not enough coil to create the demagnetization problem. However, Guido says based on the published specs underhung is mathematically impossible. I'm not in a position to question Guido's 'maths' but I reserve judgement because published specs can contain errors. Either way, I really like the sound of the 1602, and I think at reasonable (ear preserving) volumes it should be OK even if Guido is right. I should note that the 1602 has a cone coating the others do not have.

    Then there is the problem of finding that lovely long-discontinued woofer.
    "Audio is filled with dangerous amateurs." --- Tim de Paravicini

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    GTA, Ont.
    Posts
    5,109
    Here's a very interesting shot of a TAD 1601b assembly ( from the blog of a master Japanese re-coner who does/did work that others wouldn't touch ) .

    Of some note, the Alnico magnet structure is not the typical internal single ring type.

    Clearly this 1601b is over-hung .

    Attached Images Attached Images  

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Germany / Hamburg
    Posts
    659
    Quote Originally Posted by speakerdave View Post
    The 1601b and ferrite 1603 use the same high-temp voice coil. What is the reason the 1603 exists if, as GT says, the costs of Alnico and ferrite motor production leveled very soon after the political situation around cobalt was relieved?
    Allright, so TAD offers the 1603 ferrite version because it takes more abuse than the alnico motor.
    Why hasnīt TAD implemented the same technology as JBL in the 1500AL to make their 1601b stay stable without demagnetization ?

    The 1602 looks pretty interesting and has a very low fs. But it has the same foam surround problems as the JBL 2235h and I think itīs a lot harder to find service-parts for TAD speakers...

    BTW, what enclosure size did you use for the 1601b ?


    @Earl: Thanks a lot for this hard to find pictures!!

  7. #7
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,719
    Quote Originally Posted by Dr.db View Post
    Why hasnīt TAD implemented the same technology as JBL in the 1500AL to make their 1601b stay stable without demagnetization ?
    Why hasn't TAD designed a new woofer in over a decade, maybe two?

    I have no idea, but over the years TAD's catalog of drivers has been steadily shrinking. No new drivers have been developed and production is very limited. Quality has been maintained and is still excellent+, but watching one wonderful driver after another become discontinued has been disappointing.


    Widget

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2008
    Location
    Germany / Hamburg
    Posts
    659
    Thatīs true, even their tweeter is obsolete now...

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Substituting driver motors; ferrite and alnico
    By bldozier in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 12-02-2015, 04:39 AM
  2. one question about the SVG motors
    By joe in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 11-20-2013, 09:13 PM
  3. what's the advantage of speaker stands?
    By brett_s in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 6
    Last Post: 09-21-2010, 06:02 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •