Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 28

Thread: ok who have any info on jbl 2269h

  1. #1
    Senior Member dino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    woodbridge va
    Posts
    417

    ok who have any info on jbl 2269h

    Will this LF driver be used in home stereo market besides pro . Will this LF driver replace the 2245 . Can it even be use in a home sub set up or 3/4 way system

  2. #2
    Senior Member baldrick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Haugesund, Norway
    Posts
    824
    It's been around some years already so my guess is that it will not be used in any home stereo. They are pricy (aprox twice of 2242) but looks like a lot of fun so I'm still looking for a pair my self

  3. #3
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    I seem to recall the frame of that driver being held up as the basis for the new synthesis 18" sub... New guts though, so no longer a 2269... also a $15,000 sub, iirc.

  4. #4
    Senior Member dino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    woodbridge va
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
    I seem to recall the frame of that driver being held up as the basis for the new synthesis 18" sub... New guts though, so no longer a 2269... also a $15,000 sub, iirc.
    15000

  5. #5
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Sorry, revel ultima rhythm2 ... $10,000. My bad.

  6. #6

  7. #7
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    0
    The woofer in the revel ultima rhythm2 sub is have complete different cone than the 2269G/H
    and the are also very expensive

    I like to know if the 2269G/H can be better replacement for 2245H than 2242H?


  8. #8
    Senior Member dino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    woodbridge va
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by hlaari View Post
    The woofer in the revel ultima rhythm2 sub is have complete different cone than the 2269G/H
    and the are also very expensive

    I like to know if the 2269G/H can be better replacement for 2245H than 2242H?

    So would I and I think a lot of people hear on this site as well

  9. #9
    Senior Member dino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    woodbridge va
    Posts
    417
    WOW look good. THX

  10. #10
    Senior Member Val's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by baldrick View Post
    It's been around some years already ...
    Found this 2006 press release...http://www.jblpro.com/press/VT4880_06/VT4880_06.htm

  11. #11
    Senior Member dino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    woodbridge va
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by Val View Post
    Thx . Were r you finding this stuff

  12. #12
    Senior Member Val's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2005
    Location
    Palo Alto, CA
    Posts
    285
    Quote Originally Posted by dino View Post
    Thx . Were r you finding this stuff
    I didn't know what a jbl 2269 was so I threw "jbl 2269" into the Google search bar. It was one of the first links.

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2011
    Location
    california
    Posts
    67
    I've been searching for along time now, I talked to JBL pro and they want 1400+ for them, but I did find a company that sells them for 1325.00 (what a deal). I've been lookin for a used PRX728( Think that's the model I know it's the 718 is single and the 728 is dual sub but not sure of the prefix off hand). If you come up with anything let me know.

  14. #14
    Senior Member dino's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Location
    woodbridge va
    Posts
    417
    Quote Originally Posted by Val View Post
    I didn't know what a jbl 2269 was so I threw "jbl 2269" into the Google search bar. It was one of the first links.
    I been using my cell phone to surf maybe I should be using my desktop

  15. #15
    Senior Member Mostlydiy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2013
    Location
    Sweden
    Posts
    235
    The woofer in the revel ultima rhythm2 sub is have complete different cone than the 2269G/H
    and the are also very expensive


    Right you are. The basket is very similar though and so is the powerhandling and dual 4" VCs. They might have worked out a special solution for the drivers sold to revel to be used in their subs.

    I like to know if the 2269G/H can be better replacement for 2245H than 2242H?


    This comes completely out of my head but I dont think whey will sound better than the 2245 in the 4345 by just swapping the drivers, possibly with a few moderations. Without Eq I believe the 2245 will have lower extension. If your goal is to blow out the windows in your home I bet 2269 would work wonders though.

    /Mostly

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Need info on 427-8A
    By MartinV56 in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-27-2009, 10:30 AM
  2. L-96 Help and Info
    By Roundsound in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-23-2008, 08:34 AM
  3. 2269h
    By Techbot in forum Transducer Information
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 10-28-2008, 05:53 PM
  4. Any one know any Info on a Amp
    By soundmanshorty in forum Professional Amps
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 11-20-2004, 11:51 AM
  5. XPL 200 info?
    By andresohc in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 21
    Last Post: 08-12-2004, 06:47 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •