Will this LF driver be used in home stereo market besides pro . Will this LF driver replace the 2245 . Can it even be use in a home sub set up or 3/4 way system
Will this LF driver be used in home stereo market besides pro . Will this LF driver replace the 2245 . Can it even be use in a home sub set up or 3/4 way system
It's been around some years already so my guess is that it will not be used in any home stereo. They are pricy (aprox twice of 2242) but looks like a lot of fun so I'm still looking for a pair my self
I seem to recall the frame of that driver being held up as the basis for the new synthesis 18" sub... New guts though, so no longer a 2269... also a $15,000 sub, iirc.
Sorry, revel ultima rhythm2 ... $10,000. My bad.
The woofer in the revel ultima rhythm2 sub is have complete different cone than the 2269G/H
and the are also very expensive
I like to know if the 2269G/H can be better replacement for 2245H than 2242H?
Found this 2006 press release...http://www.jblpro.com/press/VT4880_06/VT4880_06.htm
I've been searching for along time now, I talked to JBL pro and they want 1400+ for them, but I did find a company that sells them for 1325.00 (what a deal). I've been lookin for a used PRX728( Think that's the model I know it's the 718 is single and the 728 is dual sub but not sure of the prefix off hand). If you come up with anything let me know.
The woofer in the revel ultima rhythm2 sub is have complete different cone than the 2269G/H
and the are also very expensive
Right you are. The basket is very similar though and so is the powerhandling and dual 4" VCs. They might have worked out a special solution for the drivers sold to revel to be used in their subs.
I like to know if the 2269G/H can be better replacement for 2245H than 2242H?
This comes completely out of my head but I dont think whey will sound better than the 2245 in the 4345 by just swapping the drivers, possibly with a few moderations. Without Eq I believe the 2245 will have lower extension. If your goal is to blow out the windows in your home I bet 2269 would work wonders though.
/Mostly
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)