Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: L-150 best refoam, shim or not ?

  1. #1
    Member Dave Cawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dartmouth Devon UK
    Posts
    55

    Cool L-150 best refoam, shim or not ?

    .
    I bought a new pair of L150's in 1980 and later sold them to some friends. Now they are back here where they belong ! But all four bass units have lost their foam.

    Which is the best kit, I have seen some with shims, others without. Cost is no object.

    Are there any driver/crossover upgrades ?

    Thanks

    Dave
    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke

  2. #2
    Senior Member Odd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Oslo, Norway ------ Now Portugal
    Posts
    812
    Resurround Step-by-step

    In the link above you also get recommendation about the possibly best kit.
    43XX (2235-2123-2450-2405-CC 3155)5235-4412-4406-4401-L250-18Ti-L40-S109 Aquarius lV-C38 (030) 305P MkII

  3. #3
    Member Dave Cawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dartmouth Devon UK
    Posts
    55

    Lightbulb

    Yes, I had read that, but the supplier doesn't seem to do the ABR and the thread doesn't actually answer any of my questions.

    Thanks

    Dave
    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke

  4. #4
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Both shim and LF tone methods work. I'd be more inclined to use the tone method if the sole issue was deteriorating foam (less intrusive and sufficient). A full-on recone definitely requires a physical centering device.

    L150A would be one upgrade, but I don't think the 044 physically fits the 033 hole without a lot of work.

    could do a partial network update and bypass (small value in parallel) the existing capacitors ala the 150A network. I don't recall if they used Mylar or polystyrene...

    I'd be surprised if the passive radiator surrounds were different than the 128H (iirc, several cone diameters were used, so your source should be asking you to measure the diameter).

  5. #5
    Senior Member Chris Brown's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    165
    Quote Originally Posted by Dave Cawley View Post
    Which is the best kit, I have seen some with shims, others without. Cost is no object.
    Both methods have their pros and cons. Using shims is the older / more traditional method. The benefit of this method is that you will be able to know, with 100% certainty, that the voice coil is perfectly aligned. That is what the shims are for. The downside is that it requires you to remove the dust cap first. That can be difficult, and it's almost impossible to get the glue to look as good as it did previously when you re-attach the dust cap. The other method involves using a 30Hz test tone during parts of the refoaming process to self-center the voice coil within the gap. This method is a bit less precise but is what most people use these days, and results are almost always more than adequate. The benefits are that it involves less work, particularly not having to remove the dust cap, which means the factory glue job can go undisturbed.

    I'm not sure if this counts as an "upgrade" but one easy thing you can try is adjusting the mass rings on the passive radiators. This would have the same effect as lengthening or shortening the port on a ported system, but thankfully adding or removing mass rings is much less permanent, making it easy to adjust to your taste.

  6. #6
    Member Dave Cawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dartmouth Devon UK
    Posts
    55

    Cool

    Thanks for the help and encouragement. I have ordered the refoam kits.

    I am amazed at the internal wiring and the input terminals on the back. JBL recommend 300W for transients, however the wires are so very thin. I'm going to replace them and solder directly to the crossover, speaker units and to the new replacement terminals.

    Thanks

    Dave
    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke

  7. #7
    Member Dave Cawley's Avatar
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Dartmouth Devon UK
    Posts
    55

    Red face

    All sorted, re-foamed and rewired including all push on connectors now soldered. 3V RMS at 22Hz but I think not essential though. Works great !

    Regards

    Dave
    "Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from magic." - Arthur C. Clarke

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 2 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 2 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is it really necessary to shim the voice coil when replacing 2235H surrounds??
    By Tweak48 in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-31-2016, 03:51 AM
  2. L5 refoam
    By Mike F in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 07-04-2015, 11:35 AM
  3. To Shim OR Not To Shim ?
    By RLock in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 04-21-2014, 08:16 PM
  4. speaker repair - shim vs '30hz'
    By pierce in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 17
    Last Post: 05-14-2009, 01:22 PM
  5. Refoam gone bad
    By louped garouv in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 16
    Last Post: 02-19-2008, 09:59 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •