Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: 4367 vs 4430

  1. #1
    Member 4344's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Location
    Hong Kong
    Posts
    74

    4367 vs 4430

    Hi,

    Have a chance to listen the new flagship 4367. However, its performance cannot completely exceed the dated 4430. A bit of disappointed

  2. #2
    Senior Member 1audiohack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    2,692
    Hi 4344;

    I haven't heard the 4367's yet but having both the 4365's and 4430's I find your observation a surprise.

    Will you share your observations? I am curious what you heard.

    All the best,
    Barry.
    If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    Coast of Maine
    Posts
    537
    Perhaps he refers to the bass response? I doubt he is referring to the Mid and high frequency.
    Careful man, there's a beverage here!

  4. #4
    Senior Member Mctwins's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2010
    Location
    Earth
    Posts
    521
    Quote Originally Posted by 4344 View Post
    Hi,

    Have a chance to listen the new flagship 4367. However, its performance cannot completely exceed the dated 4430. A bit of disappointed
    Hallo!

    It can't be so bad

    Did you compare it with a same system and same room. I have also 4365 and it sounds great. Can't be so much difference between 4365 and 4367!!

    Well, well, right amplifier is the culprit

  5. #5
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,548
    Have a chance to listen the new flagship 4367. However, its performance cannot completely exceed the dated 4430. A bit of disappointed
    User Error.
    Next...

  6. #6
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    6,960
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    User Error.
    Next...
    Ear wax??
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  7. #7
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,331
    I wonder if the OP listened to them both in the same sitting...
    Even if so, individual taste is what it is.

    I come back to my 4430s after a few weeks and I'm always surprised
    at how well they hold up (you'd think the surprise would wear off).

    I could see a poor (relatively) setup of -any- speaker not
    comparing well to nicely situated and familiar 4430s, especially
    when there's a significant time offset.

  8. #8
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    14,548
    Even if so, individual taste is what it is.
    That only goes so far though. It's really hard to get past the fact that the transducers are so much better in the 4367 compared to the 4430. I highly doubt that G.T. scratched his head and said "Hmm, let me see how I can eff up this system design using these fantastic transducers so the system performance can't completely exceed the 4430 some 35 years after the fact."

  9. #9
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,331
    Lol. Indeed.

  10. #10
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,631
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    That only goes so far though. It's really hard to get past the fact that the transducers are so much better in the 4367 compared to the 4430. I highly doubt that G.T. scratched his head and said "Hmm, let me see how I can eff up this system design using these fantastic transducers so the system performance can't completely exceed the 4430 some 35 years after the fact."
    Hi 4313B,

    Can be that proved by some measurements data, on normal home listening sound level.

    Regards
    Ivica

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Richmond Hill, Ont.
    Posts
    4,675
    Quote Originally Posted by 4344 View Post
    Hi,

    (I), Have a chance to listen the new flagship 4367.

    However, its performance cannot completely exceed the dated 4430. A bit of disappointed
    In my world, the first sentence is clearly future tense. ( ie; the event has not yet happened. )

    FYI, I support everyone's right to interpret Mangled English any way they wish.


  12. #12
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    6,960
    Quote Originally Posted by Earl K View Post
    In my world, the first sentence is clearly future tense. ( ie; the event has not yet happened. )

    FYI, I support everyone's right to interpret Mangled English any way they wish.

    So, how well can you communicate in Chinese?
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  13. #13
    Member
    Join Date
    Jun 2013
    Location
    Gold Coast Australia
    Posts
    31
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWCCA View Post
    So, how well can you communicate in Chinese?
    especially since it is not even a language
    Jbl L15, S4600

  14. #14
    Senior Member SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    PDX, ®egon
    Posts
    9,071
    Quote Originally Posted by BMWCCA View Post
    So, how well can you communicate in Chinese?
    they generally speak Queens English very well in Hong Kong . It was a British colony for many years.
    “If you think that’s the dumbest thing you’ve ever heard,
    just wait a couple minutes!”

  15. #15
    Senior Member audiomagnate's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2011
    Location
    Colorado and Georgia
    Posts
    1,014
    Quote Originally Posted by 4344 View Post
    Hi,

    Have a chance to listen the new flagship 4367. However, its performance cannot completely exceed the dated 4430. A bit of disappointed
    Name:  you cannot be serious.jpg
Views: 476
Size:  95.8 KB

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Jbl 4367 ? .....
    By joeinid in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 95
    Last Post: 06-08-2019, 10:47 PM
  2. JBL 4367 first listen
    By jpw in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 346
    Last Post: 02-25-2019, 04:01 AM
  3. JBL M2 vs 4367... 250Ti
    By SoundDiva13 in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 8
    Last Post: 08-05-2016, 04:52 AM
  4. 4367 going active, will we get 90% of M2?
    By johnhere in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-14-2016, 08:12 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •