Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 25

Thread: JBL 12" Transducer Decision - Unbeliveable

  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Austin Texas
    Posts
    7

    Cool JBL 12" Transducer Decision - Unbeliveable

    I'm a recent 'Newbie' to this site. I've been scouring about for days trying to determine which JBL 12" for my build?
    THIS IS MY 1ST POST- Excuse the new thread, but this a BIG POSTING for me !

    Narrowed it down between the 128h(or 128h-1) and the 2214h, mainly based on availability and repair feasibility.
    The 2203A were my 'Wish' choice but reality rules us all. I've got the 077 Slots, pair of N1200, thinking about some LE85 (more dreams). The warmth of the 128H intrigues me as a lower Mid w/deeper low end driver TBD. Decisions, decisions !
    Only thing I was really certain about is 3.8-4.0 cubic foot enclosures I built 10 years ago.

    With OEM reconing kits NLA, or at least very rare for many transducers; My search/decision wasn't going very well. But it seemed 128h or 2214 were 'do-able'.

    Frustrated and about to give up, decided to run Ebay one more time, one more LOOK

    WOW..... Luck, Karma, BS, The Wind (def. not my charm or looks)... Whatever!
    NEVER GIVE UP, Never !

    Found a PAIR of "NEW-NEVER USED" JBL 128H-1 in original boxes (1 unopened). $170.ea ...$35ship/pair

    A New pair of 128H-1 for $377.total WHAT A DEAL ! .......It is 2016, if that may seem high to you.

    Decision made for me, Cool. I'm one Happy Camper now.
    Thanks for all the posts that lead me, Guys .

    And....................never give up !

    http://www.ebay.com/itm/281954222409

    Charles
    love this site

  2. #2
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    can you translate this line from the ad ?

    "Not bidding if you are not sure what you want.
    creates a problem in the store if your aferta is automatically accepted
    and you do not buy."


    looking at the pix, it puts some doubt in my mind that they have not been refoamed.

    The ring is not centered (look at LEFT vs RIGHT side spacing)
    Attached Images Attached Images  
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  3. #3
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Austin Texas
    Posts
    7
    Quote Originally Posted by SEAWOLF97 View Post
    can you translate this line from the ad ?

    "Not bidding if you are not sure what you want.
    creates a problem in the store if your aferta is automatically accepted
    and you do not buy."
    Sure, it was my 1st consideration. Poor Miami English: 'aferta' (Spanish) literally means 'sacrifice'. The Latino usage is 'commitment'. The verbiage before noun is typical.
    So: " Do not bid if your not sure you want to buy it. An automatic 'Buy it Now' bid is a commitment to buy. If you fail to purchase, item will be blocked from My Ebay Store until issue is resolved."
    Standard Ebay procedure for several years.
    Well the dialect fit the location.

    2nd consideration: The was the irony of translation: 'Sacrifice'.........Hmm, not good

    3rd consideration: Comparison of as many different pictures I could find verses the seller's pictures. Wouldn't expect original surrounds to be in perfect condition due to their age alone. But already re-foamed ....would suggest a rip-off wouldn't it. And yes I saw the apparent non-concentric edge transitions. I looked over the seller's pictures for quite awhile with the best imagining software I have; digital images being what they are. I really liked the color consistency which I considered a big plus; all the re-foams I've seen have a very noticeable contrast to the cone's hue/tint. But something about the non-concentric edges..... lighting, shadows, imaging error ? It sent me to digging through my college texts. Astronomy.....Physics.....No.... Bingo... Introduction to Optical Engineering Yu/Yang (silly rabbit, .....Now Prove It or How to test it)

    3.5 Empirical Test: A few pics are worth a 1,000 words. Image plane perpendicular to axis, off axis 2-3". Concave SoRev w/evenly spaced & constant separation of parallel concentric rings. (YHTTMWOT).
    Name:  IMAG0679.jpg
Views: 1351
Size:  44.3 KBName:  IMAG0680.jpg
Views: 1331
Size:  38.7 KBName:  IMAG0681.jpg
Views: 1337
Size:  45.4 KB

    IBD'd (the rabbit hole) Perspective or parallax errors ....imaging optics
    When standard optics are used to image 3-D objects, distant objects will appear smaller than those farther away.
    http://www.vision-systems.com/articl...surements.html

    4.0 Final Consideration: The listing was brand new, only a few hours old. Everything seems to fit. WHAT the hell.
    Best snag these NOW, before someone else does.

    That's how I rationalized the purchase, We will soon see.

  4. #4
    Senior Member LowPhreak's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    United Corporate States of Neo-Feudal Amurica, Inc.
    Posts
    702
    Hmm, well that explanation may work in the case of the plate, but to me the cone looks off-center to the surround; even the dust cap is not centered.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Austin Texas
    Posts
    7

    Newbee Learns Lesson From Senior Member(s)

    SEAWOLF .....& now LOWPHREAK
    You are absolutely right !
    I Must Give You Kudos, .... good eyes.

    Quote Originally Posted by SEAWOLF97 View Post
    can you translate this line from the ad ?
    ....the pix, it puts some doubt in my mind that they have not been refoamed.
    A further search of Ebay popped this up:
    http://www.ebay.com/itm/262323412838...%3AMEBIDX%3AIT

    Looks familiar, huh.
    Name:  Real1.jpg
Views: 1308
Size:  17.0 KB

    Like the serial nos !
    Name:  real2.jpg
Views: 1248
Size:  22.2 KB "borrowed"Name:  Bogus2.jpg
Views: 1230
Size:  22.0 KB

    My seller insists items are as described (even though cropped images were 'borrowed' from another seller) and states :
    " I'll be happy when you confirm me that received the product in good condition."

    I'm sure..... & not getting nailed for major violation of Ebay policy.

    Damn, I HATE the taste of blackbird (crow).....
    even more than waiting for this to play out. I'll just shut up for now.

  6. #6
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Audiocluster View Post
    SEAWOLF .....& now LOWPHREAK
    You are absolutely right !
    I Must Give You Kudos, .... good eyes.
    My seller insists items are as described (even though cropped images were 'borrowed' from another seller) and states :
    " I'll be happy when you confirm me that received the product in good condition."

    I'm sure..... & not getting nailed for major violation of Ebay policy.

    Damn, I HATE the taste of blackbird (crow).....
    even more than waiting for this to play out. I'll just shut up for now.
    things MAY still turn out OKAY . If we were picking apart a driver image that the seller had "borrowed" , then there is still a chance of success

    IF you are going to steal images for an auction, at least get good ones

    Hope you used PP ... just "in case" ...
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Austin Texas
    Posts
    7

    Post Lady Luck and 128H-1 '05 Virgin Twins

    The Man's Word Is Gold; His Picture was a fake for some reason.
    Opening these Restored My Faith in Human Nature
    Best I can determine, these were in limbo 'Not for Retail', No more Harman Re-Seller payola?.

    It's Show Time:

    Name:  IMG_0030.jpg
Views: 1172
Size:  89.2 KBName:  IMG_0035.jpg
Views: 1147
Size:  92.7 KBName:  IMG_0051.jpg
Views: 1151
Size:  113.9 KBName:  IMG_0110.jpg
Views: 1146
Size:  79.0 KBName:  IMG_0189._No_Flash.jpg
Views: 1142
Size:  109.4 KB

    You Bet I'm Happy
    Charles

  8. #8
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Congrats and have fun!

  9. #9
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Is there a date code anywhere ?

    suspect that they will need new surrounds in the not to distant future
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Austin Texas
    Posts
    7
    Lot was shipped from JBL 2/21/2005:
    The bar serial codes on box labels are J502-03170 & J502-03161 where the 5 digit suffix is Serial # stamped on medallion plate.
    J502-If Prod Date, would think either '05 or '02 ....Could be Oct 5 2002

    Those serial numbers seem rather low don't they? 03161 & 03170 Well maybe not for '02.

    The surrounds seem in excellent shape, speaker's were well confined within the plastic wrapping. But, your right, they may go south fast. In which case I'll seek a pro for the task.

  11. #11
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2016
    Location
    Austin Texas
    Posts
    7
    Another question about the 128H or 128H-1. Why are full specs so hard to find. They're not considered part of the 2200 Series. The only thing I found are the TS specs listed on page 103(pg2) JBL Pro(Thiele Small Low Freq Para & Def) and this original freq. chart from GT's original notes:


    Name:  OrigJBLFreqChart.jpg
Views: 1107
Size:  47.5 KB

    No sales or application sheets found. Seems odd with the good reputation these have.
    Anyone got a link ?

  12. #12
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    You can check the 4412 and 44xx family pdf files which will give you distortion as well as power compression figures.

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    La Habra, California USA
    Posts
    1,546
    Charles, Congrats on your purchase!
    When faced with another JBL find, Good mech986 says , JBL Fan mech986 says

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Location
    Los Angeles
    Posts
    28
    They have the same coil and motor. The 128H is less deep and has a much smoother response out past 800Hz. The 2214H is slightly louder and has a much deeper cone. It has a pretty nasty peak hole-peak combination starting around 800 Hz as I recall. The 2214H has more travel before bottoming out than does the compact 128H and -1.

    Both are very nice general use woofers, but neither are particularly well suited to sub woofer work.

  15. #15
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2003
    Location
    La Habra, California USA
    Posts
    1,546
    Greg, would aquaplas damping of the center dust caps have done much for the midbass/midrange woofer responses, or is that much more a function of cone depth, angles, and curvature? What are the factors that are possibly within control of a transducer engineer with regards to the issues like the 2214H exhibited besides the crossover?
    When faced with another JBL find, Good mech986 says , JBL Fan mech986 says

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. JBL 075 "Railroad Transducer" tweeters
    By Speakertown in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 05-26-2009, 11:55 AM
  2. Amplifier decision
    By Nightbrace in forum Consumer Amps
    Replies: 62
    Last Post: 01-27-2006, 03:53 AM
  3. Amplifier decision
    By Nightbrace in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 01-24-2006, 11:53 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •