Page 3 of 7 FirstFirst 12345 ... LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 96

Thread: Jbl 4367 ? .....

  1. #31
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    761
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    There is something to be said for the light weight transducers.
    I did not quite follow you here. Bare with me, and tell it to me like I am 3 years old!

    English is not my first language.

  2. #32
    Senior Member Valentin's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Mexico
    Posts
    725
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    There is something to be said for the light weight transducers.
    Applied engineering makes them extreemly good i would say

  3. #33
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by bubbleboy76 View Post
    what about the light pro neo diff-drive 12" 2262h and 15" 2265h, how do they stand compared to the 2206h respectiveley 2216nd?
    light is good for me, maybe want to wall-hang in a future HT.
    Hi bubbleboy76,

    I would expect them to be very good mid-bass drivers, as they are 3-inch voice coil design.

    http://www.jblpro.com/ProductAttachm...ote_v1_n33.pdf

    Looking at the 2206 FR curves, it seems to be almost perfect flat response without any response large peaks and deeps,
    so I would expect it to be easily incorporated in the system.

    I think that 2242, 2226 and 2206 are on one side [ JBL Technical Notes Volume 1, Number 22 ]

    and 2268, 2265 and 2262 and not to be forgotten 2269 for the bass section, on the other side.

    It is known that Nd magnet is more sensitive to the higher temperature (loosing its strength) , while ceramic can be 'recovered' while become cool.
    https://accelconf.web.cern.ch/accelc.../FAP/FAP21.PDF
    some ideas can be seen:

    http://forums.prosoundweb.com/index.php/topic,142872.msg1321006.html#msg1321006


    regards
    ivica

  4. #34
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    Looking at the 2206 FR curves, it seems to be almost perfect flat response without any response large peaks and deeps.
    Yeah, it was too good in just about every way for the legacy JBL guys to ever get on board with. Not enough rising response and/or distortion output for them. I think D.B. designed it. The guy absolutely knows his stuff... I believe he did alot of the neo transducers too.

  5. #35
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    0
    2206 and 2262 are very good mid bass drivers I have play with 2262 for some years ago

    what about the 10" 251J?
    that driver look´s very good on papers

  6. #36
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Urbandale, Iowa
    Posts
    142
    My JBL rep says my 4367's will ship the end of November.
    Others who ordered first may get theirs sooner.
    So December sometime before I get my hands on them and can give any feedback.

  7. #37
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jpw View Post
    My JBL rep says my 4367's will ship the end of November.
    Others who ordered first may get theirs sooner.
    So December sometime before I get my hands on them and can give any feedback.
    Cool! What amplifier are you gonna drive this with?

  8. #38
    Senior Member martin_wu99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Xi'An,China
    Posts
    1,479
    Quote Originally Posted by Mctwins View Post
    Cool! What amplifier are you gonna drive this with?
    Should be "are you going to use to drive......."
    46 lover

  9. #39
    Senior Member martin_wu99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Xi'An,China
    Posts
    1,479
    Quote Originally Posted by jpw View Post
    My JBL rep says my 4367's will ship the end of November.
    Others who ordered first may get theirs sooner.
    So December sometime before I get my hands on them and can give any feedback.
    We all are anxiou to wait your feedback
    46 lover

  10. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2010
    Location
    Urbandale, Iowa
    Posts
    142
    Currently I personally use at home McIntosh MC-601 600 watt monoblocks, although I also have a Krell Duo 300, ML 200 wpc integrated and Audio Research REF-75 tube amp at store.

  11. #41
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jpw View Post
    Currently I personally use at home McIntosh MC-601 600 watt monoblocks, although I also have a Krell Duo 300, ML 200 wpc integrated and Audio Research REF-75 tube amp at store.
    McIntosh is a perfect match for 4367. Power rating is perfect as well. Connect it to the 4 ohm tap and run in single wire and be happy! It is allready bi-wired inside the speaker

  12. #42
    Member joeinid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    46
    My thoughts too. I am excited for everyone's opinions on these speakers and while I lust for MC1.2KW's, the MC452 is more likely in my future unless someone talks back into the MC1.2KW's


    Quote Originally Posted by Mctwins View Post
    McIntosh is a perfect match for 4367. Power rating is perfect as well. Connect it to the 4 ohm tap and run in single wire and be happy! It is already bi-wired inside the speaker
    Quote Originally Posted by jpw View Post
    Currently I personally use at home McIntosh MC-601 600 watt mono blocks, although I also have a Krell Duo 300, ML 200 wpc integrated and Audio Research REF-75 tube amp at store.
    Quote Originally Posted by martin_wu99 View Post
    We all are anxious to wait your feedback
    Big plus 1. So exciting.

  13. #43
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Mctwins View Post
    McIntosh is a perfect match for 4367. Power rating is perfect as well. Connect it to the 4 ohm tap and run in single wire and be happy! It is allready bi-wired inside the speaker
    Hallo!

    I have lookt at the new Mcintosh and to me the MC302 seems to be a good match for the 4367 if looking that the 4367 has 300Watts(RMS) at 6 ohms.

    So, it means

    Watts x ohm Squareroot = Volts

    300x6 Squareroot = 42.42Volt
    600x6 Squareroot = 60Volts This is the maximum voltage this speaker can handle.

    So, connecting higher power will give more voltage drive to the speakers and be careful with the volume knob.

  14. #44
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by jpw View Post
    My JBL rep says my 4367's will ship the end of November.
    Others who ordered first may get theirs sooner.
    So December sometime before I get my hands on them and can give any feedback.
    The 4367 was G.T.'s last system design for JBL and one of the delays in production was due to his sudden unexpected unwarranted departure.

  15. #45
    Member joeinid's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    NY
    Posts
    46

    Naim gear with the JBL 4367? Opinions?

    Does anyone think Naim could be a great match with these speakers? I had a Supernait2 integrated and miss the Naim sound. I was thinking about going higher up in the Naim line as another flavor to what I have for these speakers should they prove to be as good as we hope.

    Thanks!

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •