Results 1 to 12 of 12

Thread: DD67000 vs 4365 vs M2 monitor

  1. #1
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    0

    DD67000 vs 4365 vs M2 monitor

    I like to know if someone here have heard DD67000, 4365 and M2 monitor side by side?

  2. #2
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by hlaari View Post
    I like to know if someone here have heard DD67000, 4365 and M2 monitor side by side?
    Hallo!

    I have not heard them side by side, but, too me, the DD67000 is a winner amongst those mentioned. Still have not heard the M2.

    Still can't forgett how good the Everest sounded at Munich last year I was there.

    If I would have more money I would go with Everest and connect my new Crown MA 5000i

    But, I am satisfied with my 4365

  3. #3
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    761
    I read an comparison between M2 and Everest somewhere in this forum.
    The conclusion as I remember it: Everest more dynamic sound. M2 better imaging.

  4. #4
    Mctwins
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by bubbleboy76 View Post
    I read an comparison between M2 and Everest somewhere in this forum.
    The conclusion as I remember it: Everest more dynamic sound. M2 better imaging.
    I think there is good dynamics in the M2. I understand now why they are using two Crowns

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    New London, WI
    Posts
    163
    Quote Originally Posted by Mctwins View Post
    I think there is good dynamics in the M2. I understand now why they are using two Crowns
    I certainly won't argue with that, but it is at least plausible that of all the speakers in the world, the DD67000 could edge it out.

  6. #6
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by bubbleboy76 View Post
    I read an comparison between M2 and Everest somewhere in this forum.
    The conclusion as I remember it: Everest more dynamic sound. M2 better imaging.
    I am pretty sure at the mid sound are better from 476Mg/Be than D2430K
    I have bin playing with 476Mg and 476Be on my M2 waveguides with original DD67000 and 4365 network and they sound amazing!
    both 476Mg and 476Be sound so much better with M2 waveguide than H9800, depth and imaging is the best I have ever heard

    Ari

  7. #7
    Senior Member 1audiohack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    3,092
    Quote Originally Posted by hlaari View Post
    ...both 476Mg and 476Be sound so much better with M2 waveguide than H9800, depth and imaging is the best I have ever heard.Ari
    Stop already! You are going to make me wish I had ordered some M2 horns.

    Barry.
    If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.

  8. #8
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    0
    Quote Originally Posted by 1audiohack View Post
    Stop already! You are going to make me wish I had ordered some M2 horns.

    Barry.
    you will not be disappointed with the M2 waveguide
    there will be interested to compare the M2 waveguide to H4365 when I will get the H4365 horns

    I have get all parts for 4365 monitor except the horns but I hope to get them soon
    how do you like your 4365, now you have had them for few month and listen to them

    Ari

  9. #9
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,742
    Quote Originally Posted by hlaari View Post
    I like to know if someone here have heard DD67000, 4365 and M2 monitor side by side?
    I haven't, but if anyone gets these together in the same room, please give me a call!

    I'd love to hear that demo!
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  10. #10
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,719
    Quote Originally Posted by hlaari View Post
    ...both 476Mg and 476Be sound so much better with M2 waveguide than H9800, depth and imaging is the best I have ever heard
    I don't find that hard to believe... but then I've never much cared for the H9800.

    Interestingly the 1400 Array horn and the DD66000/DD67000 horn are both similar to the H9800 and I've been quite happy with both of those.


    Widget

  11. #11
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,742
    H9800 sounded pretty darn good in vertical mode with a 476Be behind it

    4365 vs dd67000 vs m2? It surprises me a little that anyone seriously considering one would be concerned with the others. I think have a fair handle on what I could expect from the first two (and would be happiest/proud putting the 67000 on display in my home and be completely delighted with the sound), but
    I'd really like to audition the m2 system, as a point of reference if nothing else.

  12. #12
    Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2016
    Location
    Uk
    Posts
    65
    I'd like to resurrect this thread in the hope that in the last couple of years some others have heard both the DD67000 and the M2 and can comment on how they compare. Anyone??

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Everest dd67000
    By caladois in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 96
    Last Post: 08-07-2016, 06:57 AM
  2. JBL DD65000/DD67000 UHF crossover schematic
    By hlaari in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-29-2014, 04:27 PM
  3. M2 vs DD67000
    By hlaari in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 04-22-2014, 06:06 AM
  4. DD67000 crossover
    By Mostlydiy in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 05-31-2013, 10:54 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •