Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 23

Thread: JBL XPL - Can't get them out of my mind...

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    17

    JBL XPL - Can't get them out of my mind...

    All,

    After finding a pair of nice 4311's and L96's. Doing some light rehab, I am hooked. Great sounding speakers, especially for the type of music I like. For some reason I read an article on the JBL XPL series and have been curious ever since. I recently lost out on a pair of 200a's on thebay, but have a line on a pair of 160's.

    I have read many postings on these, but I am a bit worried about the failure issues reported on the Ti mid speaker. Is this pervasive or just a small issue. Also, how do these really stack up to my existing collection? I have seen some comparisons, but they seem split.

    Specific to the 200a vs 160 is there a clear winner? Will the smaller woofer on the 160 necessitate a sub?

    Any opinions are welcome, either fuel my fire, or douse it!

    Thanks

  2. #2
    Dang. Amateur speakerdave's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2003
    Location
    Northern California
    Posts
    3,736
    You already have a couple of solid three-ways. On the other hand, the 160 would be a further exploration of the JBL three-way and a serious upgrade in the treble. They likely would not end your search for the 200, though; might intensify it, in fact. When you find them your 160 mids and tweets would be spares. That is, if your situation can tolerate such a burgeoning collection.
    "Audio is filled with dangerous amateurs." --- Tim de Paravicini

  3. #3
    Super Moderator jblnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Mass
    Posts
    900

    an undiscovered gem...

    I owned some 140's for a year or so before I found my 250Ti's. To this day (10 years later) there are still things I miss about them. For one, they image spectacularly well due to the cabinet construction (especially if you have them up on the stands). I haven't heard every JBL, but these have to be among the very best imagers in the line. Second, that 093Ti mid does some really special things on certain material. I really liked it for jazz as the trumpets and saxes just jump out at you in a way they don't on the 250. Finally, they look very nice and have a high WAF factor if that's important.

    In the bass department, I was amazed at the low notes that the 140 could hit. But, it could not play them loud as there are limits to a single 8" driver. You might get a little more out of a 160 but in the end, you'll probably want a sub.

    Someday I'd like to hear a 200 and if I had found a pair of those before the 250's, I might have stopped right there.

    Best of luck in your XPL quest. They are a rare and truly unique page in the JBL history book. Some might call them the last attempt by JBL to put out a "hi-fi shop" speaker for the US market before it all went to big-box store hell....

    jblnut

  4. #4
    Senior Member Don C's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Santa Rosa CA
    Posts
    1,722
    The bigger XPLs are going to be able to fill a bigger room, or have more impact in a regular sized room compared to L96. I've owned both. I loved my L96s, but the XPL200 are bigger, clearer and better. I haven't heard the smaller XPLs. With the standard XPL200 crossover in place the midranges and highs are somewhat emphasized, so you might not notice the bass power you are getting. I didn't like them when turned up very loud that way. Bi-amping and rebalancing the relative driver levels a bit to taste revealed their true power.

  5. #5
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    17
    More pictures of the fun...

    Name:  DSCN1247.JPG
Views: 1189
Size:  74.9 KBName:  DSCN1248.JPG
Views: 1238
Size:  74.3 KBName:  DSCN1249.JPG
Views: 1273
Size:  75.6 KBName:  DSCN1250.JPG
Views: 1213
Size:  74.9 KBName:  DSCN1251.JPG
Views: 1241
Size:  76.7 KB

  6. #6
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    17
    Okay, it was hair dryer to the rescue and the speakers are all now free to begin re foam and cabinet work!

  7. #7
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    17
    Thanks all this is exactly the kind of feedback I am looking for. I have have a rare day off so am doing some serious listening to my speakers at volume. It's tough for me to find the right balance between the 4311 and the L96. One has much better bass while the other much better mid treble (no kidding, right). I am looking for that perfect balance and hoping the XPL would be it since I can't rationalize the size or $$ of some of my other target JBL'S (L200/L300/L250ti/etc).

    Keep it coming and thanks again.

  8. #8
    Super Moderator jblnut's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2003
    Location
    Central Mass
    Posts
    900

    Ti ?

    I will toss out the idea of either 120TI or 240Ti as you would get exactly what you are after - same bass with better high end. Much easier to find than XPL too...


    jblnut

  9. #9
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,756
    Don't overlook the L7 which has a lot of the appeal of the XPLs but with greater availability at an unusually low price for the performance. From what I"ve seen you can buy three L7s for what the XPL200s go for these days.
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  10. #10
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    17
    Agreed and that is what I did. Replaced both and have just finished setup tonight. Amazing. I don't get the review and comments on lack of bass. I find these to have great low end. What a fantastic sound. The XPLS have exceeded my expectations, what a great speaker. Couldn't be happier.

    Thanks all!

  11. #11
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by Coolness View Post
    Agreed and that is what I did. Replaced both and have just finished setup tonight. Amazing. I don't get the review and comments on lack of bass. I find these to have great low end. What a fantastic sound. The XPLS have exceeded my expectations, what a great speaker. Couldn't be happier.

    Thanks all!
    perceived bass is not solely from the woofer. Even the small 4301b & L16/19 put out a pretty good thump.
    placement, room acoustics play a large part of that equation too.

    Sounds like you've found a good solution.(no pun intended) ..congrats.

    My 250Ti's with their 14's can put out tremendous bass, but ..believe it or not ...do benefit from a sub.
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  12. #12
    Senior Member HCSGuy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2009
    Location
    Bend, OR
    Posts
    752
    Last time we did a side by side comparison, it was my XPL160's next to my dad's 250TiBq's. The XPL's did have better detail in the mids. However, the 160's bass was so poor we couldn't get over it and stopped listening. The 250ti's go lower and with better definition, while the XPL160's had a bump in the mid bass but no real bottom end, and definition described as sounding like an oar hitting the side of a rubber raft. Since then, I have picked up XPL200's and a DX1, though I haven't A/B'd them against anything, and they're probably going to go when I get done building my Timber arrays or DD55000 copies. They are far better than 160's, though, and would be keepers if I didn't have a few better speakers laying around. The Cascade would have been really special
    That the internet contains a blog documenting your life does not constitute proof that your existence is valid. Sorry.

  13. #13
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    17
    I appreciate the great feedback as alwayd. Good alternatives being suggested.

    Thanks!

  14. #14
    Member antoninus9's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2009
    Location
    Atlanta
    Posts
    37
    I used to have three pairs of speakers (JBL 250ti, B&W Matrix 801 III, and XPL-200A) that I dragged in and out of my system, but I kept going back to the XPL-200's. As I got older and tired of dragging large heavy speakers back and forth I settled on the XPL-200's, and parted with the others. Having had the XPL's since the early 90's, I'm very familiar with them (I also have a pair of XPL-90's).

    In single amplifier configurations the 250ti and B&W Matrix 801 are better than the XPL-200, but bi-amping with a DX-1 crossover pushes the XPL-200 to the front of the pack. It makes a big difference in imaging and detail.

    The factory stands for the XPL-200's are, in my setup, too short. I have them with their stands atop 5.5" of concrete patio stones. The tweeter is about the same height as the 250ti's.

    As far as faulty titanium midranges are concerned, I've never had a failure, and continue to use the originals that came in the cabinets.

    I also saw mention of the 120ti. It's a wonderful speaker too when placed atop a 20" stand and backed by a decent sub.

    I hope this helps with your decision.
    The Music Man's equipment: Sony AM radio

  15. #15
    Junior Member
    Join Date
    Jan 2015
    Location
    Gilbert, AZ
    Posts
    17
    Quote Originally Posted by antoninus9 View Post
    I used to have three pairs of speakers (JBL 250ti, B&W Matrix 801 III, and XPL-200A) that I dragged in and out of my system, but I kept going back to the XPL-200's. As I got older and tired of dragging large heavy speakers back and forth I settled on the XPL-200's, and parted with the others. Having had the XPL's since the early 90's, I'm very familiar with them (I also have a pair of XPL-90's).

    In single amplifier configurations the 250ti and B&W Matrix 801 are better than the XPL-200, but bi-amping with a DX-1 crossover pushes the XPL-200 to the front of the pack. It makes a big difference in imaging and detail.

    The factory stands for the XPL-200's are, in my setup, too short. I have them with their stands atop 5.5" of concrete patio stones. The tweeter is about the same height as the 250ti's.

    As far as faulty titanium midranges are concerned, I've never had a failure, and continue to use the originals that came in the cabinets.

    I also saw mention of the 120ti. It's a wonderful speaker too when placed atop a 20" stand and backed by a decent sub.

    I hope this helps with your decision.
    Thanks Antoninus, this does help. One of my biggest worries are of the few I have read online about the mid failures. Hearing your experience helps a ton. BTW, I am a noob to bi amping. What amps did you drive into your XPL-200's? Were they equal wattage to the low and hi, or did you drive different power to each?

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Is sound only in the mind?
    By Akira in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 05-24-2008, 07:48 PM
  2. The mind boggles !!!
    By jan_slagman in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 02-28-2006, 06:32 PM
  3. The mind boggles !!!
    By jan_slagman in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 02-28-2006, 11:10 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •