Page 1 of 3 123 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 32

Thread: DIY tri-amped 2226 2445 2405 system update

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Member danvprod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    67

    DIY tri-amped 2226 2445 2405 system update

    I figured it was time to do an update on my system in a new thread, since I've made considerable changes. It's still in a state of flux, but I believe moving in the right direction.

    The system is comprised of JBL 2226J, 2445J and 2405Js. Previous set up was to run everything through a MiniDSP 2x4 with a passive 8 kHz crossover to the 2405.

    Added a new DSP to the system: Xilica XP 4080. I had gone back and forth on what DSP to use. I ended up with the Xilica has I found one on eBay for the same price as a MiniDSP 4x10, and I think the Xilica is in another league. Setup of the Xilica was not as easy as the MiniDSP (software is not as nice), but once it's up and running having the metering on the front and the mutes on inputs and outputs are really nice.

    Previously I had been running my 300B mono blocks for the 2405/2445 and a Rotel RB1050. I am now running a Pioneer VSX-D912 after getting some pretty stellar recommendations to do so from AudioCircle. I do consider it a temporary solution, but it is working OK. It's nice to have 6 channels of application in a single device. (My 300Bs need some repairs done to them -- I will likely have them back powering the 2445Js when I get them back).

    Once it gets a bit nicer outside, I need to get this out and measure them and tweak the crossover. Right now I am running the following:

    2226: LP 500 Hz 24 dB/Octave; +8 @ 35 Hz, Q 1.1 (Thanks, Lee).
    2445: 47 uF Dayton Protection Cap, HP 500 Hz 12 dB/Octave; LP 8000 Hz 24 dB/Octave; - Polarity (In Xilica) -- -20 dB Gain
    2405: 2.2 uF Dayton Precision Audio Cap, HP 8000 Hz 24 dB/Octave. -15 dB Gain

    I have the 2226 delayed by .6 ms and the 2405 delayed by .8 ms.

    Next step is to find a better audio rack, get the tube amps fixed, get my turntable hooked back up and figure out more permanent amplification (any suggestions?).

    The Xilica has balanced outputs, so I was considering just running 3 power amps -- I had been looking at the Behringer Reference A500.
    The balanced outputs and a potential negative of the Xilica in a home system, it would also be nice if it had a digital input. Right now I am running the output of my Apogee Duet into Analog input 1/2 of the Xilica. The Turntable will be in 3/4.

    Anyways, would appreciate some thoughts and comments.

    Name:  DLV_20150308_3080001.jpg
Views: 1834
Size:  50.5 KB
    Name:  DLV_20150308_3080002.jpg
Views: 1653
Size:  63.1 KB
    Name:  DLV_20150308_3080004.jpg
Views: 1746
Size:  49.3 KB
    Name:  DLV_20150308_3080005.jpg
Views: 1602
Size:  42.3 KB
    Name:  DLV_20150308_3080006.jpg
Views: 1529
Size:  269.0 KB

  2. #2
    Senior Member Lee in Montreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    2,487
    I encourage you to go to a full 3-way system with tweeters on their own amp. When you do so, I recommend either an amp with low power if it has output relays (20 watts?). Or any amp will do if it has no output relays. My experience with amps running output relays is that the power required to run those 2405 is so small that it tends to damage the relays. They kinda stick shut. No output unless you really crank the amp to unstick the relays, then reduce volume.

    On the woofer, I suggest you test different Q values. Could be anything from 0.8 to 1.1 and it is a matter of taste. For a more natural sound, I recommend crossing to the mid at 12db or 18db per octave. I find that 24db sounds less natural. Especially when crossing at a "low" 500Hz. The Linkwitz-Riley mode has some advantages as the end result remains flat.

    And your 2405 deserve better stands. Check my avatar ;-)


  3. #3
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee in Montreal View Post
    ....... For a more natural sound, I recommend crossing to the mid at 12db or 18db per octave. I find that 24db sounds less natural. Especially when crossing at a "low" 500Hz. The Linkwitz-Riley mode has some advantages as the end result remains flat.
    ....
    Hi Lee,

    Interesting observation. May be using compression driver with the horn around so low frequency ( 500Hz), driver&horn 12dB hi-pass characteristics 'interfere with' the network 24dB hi-pass characteristics, resulting in such not natural reproduction.
    From your large experience, is it the same behavior recognizable if say over 1kHz, 24dB L-R crossover frequency filter is applied.

    What about around 10kHz ?

    Reagrds
    Ivica

  4. #4
    Senior Member Lee in Montreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    2,487
    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    Hi Lee,

    Interesting observation. May be using compression driver with the horn around so low frequency ( 500Hz), driver&horn 12dB hi-pass characteristics 'interfere with' the network 24dB hi-pass characteristics, resulting in such not natural reproduction.
    From your large experience, is it the same behavior recognizable if say over 1kHz, 24dB L-R crossover frequency filter is applied.

    What about around 10kHz ?

    Reagrds
    Ivica
    You are flattering me too much ;-) I don't have a large experience. Just a few observations. I think that at such low frequency (500Hz is maybe low for a comp driver) trying to extend down to 500Hz with a 24db slope is maybe taking the risk of loosing a few dbs down there. While with a 12db slope, you get some content from the woofer. I don't think 24db is a problem at higher frequencies.

    As for L-R vs Butterworth, the diagram I posted explains clearly the benefit of L-R's flat response instead of getting a slight bump at separation frequency such as is the case with Butterworth.

    BTW our hobby is great as it allow us to try so many options, and what could be heresy for somebody might end up being heaven for another. Give a man (or a woman) a couple of drivers and amps, and he will keep busy all his life... ;-)

    Lee

  5. #5
    Member danvprod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    67
    What are your thoughts about using the Crown D-45 vs. something like a low-powered SET to power the rings? Something like this: http://www.decware.com/newsite/SE84CKC.html

    Obviously, there is a huge price difference. I could get a pair of D-45s (for the 2405s and 2445s) and an Adcom GF 555 ii (for the 2226s) for the same price as the SET and power my whole rig. Or pad down my CD/ST as I am trying to do now and keep the AVA7, which is a pretty solid amp, too.

    Or maybe just let the AVA7 power the 2226s and pick up a pair of D-45s.

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    Texas
    Posts
    1,863
    I've never used one, but Emotiva has a passive attenuator to use with amps that have no means of adjusting the input signal.

    https://emotiva.com/products/electronics/control-freak

    Of course you'd need 1 unit for each pair of channels, just something else to consider.

    There are other passive attenuators out there, but $50 is a pretty decent price point.

  7. #7
    Member danvprod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    67
    Well that may be the answer! Thanks for the input, guys.

  8. #8
    Senior Member 1audiohack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    3,095
    The D45 is a 13 Volt output amp that will drive a whopping 14 Watts into the 12 Ohm load that ALL JBL ring radiators present to the amp.

    I would also say that there is no good reason to put any passive components between the output of a D45 and the 240X that is actively crossed on the input side. Working properly the D45 has no transient on-off clicks or thumps. A nearly perfect amp for a pair of rings.

    All the best,
    Barry.
    If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.

  9. #9
    Senior Member BMWCCA's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    Virginia
    Posts
    7,756
    Quote Originally Posted by 1audiohack View Post
    I would also say that there is no good reason to put any passive components between the output of a D45 and the 240X that is actively crossed on the input side. Working properly the D45 has no transient on-off clicks or thumps. A nearly perfect amp for a pair of rings.
    That's why I purchased three of them!
    ". . . as you have no doubt noticed, no one told the 4345 that it can't work correctly so it does anyway."—Greg Timbers

  10. #10
    Senior Member 1audiohack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    3,095
    That's really looking good! I can't hear it from here though.

    All the best,
    Barry.
    If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.

  11. #11
    Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Germany
    Posts
    37
    The balanced outputs and a potential negative of the Xilica in a home system
    No problem at all. You just need XLR/RCA adapters or cables with the right plugs fitted on each end.
    it would also be nice if it had a digital input
    Essential in terms of quality. Adding a completely unnecessary D/A-, followed by an A/D conversion isn't a good idea at all.
    Regards: Holger

  12. #12
    Member danvprod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    67

    Crossover slopes

    The reason I use 24 dB/octave on the woofer and 12 dB/octave on the midrange CD is because it's already falling off pretty steep below 500 Hz (about another 12 dB/octave). The combined result is a 24 dB/octave slope on both. If I wanted a 12 dB/octave, I'd have to move the crossover frequency up -- perhaps up to 750 Hz. But as you said: give a man a few drivers, amps and DSPs and you can keep him busy for a lifetime.

    BTW, I decided to return the Xilica XP-4080 and stick get the MiniDSP 4x10 HD instead. This will let me run full digital in and avoid an extra A/D D/A in my signal path. And I still have an extra pair of analog inputs for my turntable and a volume control should I want to explore some different power amps.

    Re: 2405 stands. Lee, do you want to make me some ?

    I really really really need to get these outside and do some quasi-anechoic measurement. Because right now I am just guess or relying on in-room measurements in my relatively small room and I can only learn so much from that.

  13. #13
    Senior Member Lee in Montreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    2,487
    Quote Originally Posted by danvprod View Post
    Re: 2405 stands. Lee, do you want to make me some ?
    I have two dozen units on the shelves. They are stainless steel. PM me if you want a set.

    Lee

  14. #14
    Member danvprod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    67

    System update

    Couple of updates on the system -- the MiniDSP 4x10 HD is working well. I've ordered a pair of aluminum stands for my CDs and some stainless steel stands for the 2405s from Lee. Thanks Lee! They should be here soon.

    This weekend I purchased a new amplifier on eBay -- it's a JBL AVA7. Should be perfect for this setup. This is the same unit as the Lexicon LX7 amplifier which is manufactured in the USA by ATI, so I figured that can't be bad.

    This will replace my Pioneer VSX D-912 receiver. Currently also trying to sell my 300B tubes amps, although I may test how they sound coupled to the 2445s with the AVA7 powering the 2226s.



  15. #15
    Member danvprod's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2013
    Location
    US
    Posts
    67
    Very cool metal stands thanks to Lee:
    Name:  2015-04-07-08.16.01.jpg
Views: 1591
Size:  90.9 KB

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2226, 2445 2405/Dayton AMT upgrade?
    By danvprod in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 02-14-2015, 07:51 PM
  2. Protection Caps for 2445/2405
    By danvprod in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 4
    Last Post: 01-25-2015, 09:32 AM
  3. JBL 2445 and Altec 421 or Jbl 2225/2226 for school theater
    By GoldcountryJim in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 7
    Last Post: 03-07-2013, 09:12 AM
  4. 2226 / 2445 / 2380or 2385 combo?
    By leifchristensen in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-15-2010, 01:43 AM
  5. 2445/2380 + 2405 xover...HELP!
    By SMKSoundPro in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-18-2008, 02:24 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •