Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 15 of 53

Thread: 2216Nd Projects

Hybrid View

Previous Post Previous Post   Next Post Next Post
  1. #1
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193

    2216Nd Projects

    I received some information on the M2 enclosure design yesterday and thought I would post it here.

    2216Nd in M2 enclosure:
    Vb = 130 liters
    Fb = 27 Hz

    One of the guys made the attachment up for me yesterday and it shows two PEQ points in the FILTERS section to the lower right. Please don't confuse this simulation with the actual DSP applied to the M2 system using the Crowns.

    I have also attached the S4700 EDS for reference.

    2216Nd in S4700 enclosure:
    Vb = 135 liters
    Fb = 32 Hz

    Finally, I have attached the 2216Nd EDS.
    Attached Images Attached Images

  2. #2
    Senior Member pos's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2007
    Location
    France
    Posts
    2,629
    Very interesting, thank you!

    I thought the M2 was tuned around 21Hz.
    The enclosure design shows a +8dB eq at the 27Hz tuning frequency, whereas the M2 crossover has a +4.7dB eq at 21.5Hz (and an addition shelving).

    Interesting read also about the S4700. Definitely a nice and well behaved system!
    The passive crossover voltage curves are a good complement to the active curves from GT you posted last year: http://www.audioheritage.org/vbullet...l=1#post354856

  3. #3
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Quote Originally Posted by pos View Post
    I thought the M2 was tuned around 21Hz.
    The enclosure design shows a +8dB eq at the 27Hz tuning frequency, whereas the M2 crossover has a +4.7dB eq at 21.5Hz (and an addition shelving).
    Yes, the actual system seems to come out a lot better than the simulation.

  4. #4
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    RobH3606 received the very first pair of 2216Nd's (M2, S4700) courtesy of Jerry Moro.

    pos and I should have a lot of fun with these. These drivers are ridiculously good. I kind of feel bad about making fun of their 3-inch voice coils early on. Obviously Jerry knew exactly what he was doing.

    I haven't decided yet if I am going to keep two pair, it is awfully tempting to build a pair of 4435-style enclosures for home theater use. The best waveguide that I have at present is the PT-H1010, pretty much a bolt-in for the older 2344.

    Hopefully pos will post about his impending project.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  5. #5
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Fun, fun, fun, (fun)

  6. #6
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    761
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    RobH3606 received the very first pair of 2216Nd's (M2, S4700) courtesy of Jerry Moro.

    pos and I should have a lot of fun with these. These drivers are ridiculously good. I kind of feel bad about making fun of their 3-inch voice coils early on. Obviously Jerry knew exactly what he was doing.

    I haven't decided yet if I am going to keep two pair, it is awfully tempting to build a pair of 4435-style enclosures for home theater use. The best waveguide that I have at present is the PT-H1010, pretty much a bolt-in for the older 2344.

    Hopefully pos will post about his impending project.
    This will be fun!

    Are they better than 1501AL? Or in between 1501AL and 1501fe in performance?

    What is the price of those things? Priceless?!

    I am interested if you will sell some.

  7. #7
    Senior Member 1audiohack's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Las Vegas Nevada
    Posts
    3,095
    HA!

    gibber, a friend and I had this exact conversation yesterday evening and I nearly spoke your last post verbatim.

    I don't know if we are right but, we sure think alike.

    Barry.
    If we knew what the hell we were doing, we wouldn't call it research would we.

  8. #8
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703
    Quote Originally Posted by 4313B View Post
    RobH3606 received the very first pair of 2216Nd's (M2, S4700) courtesy of Jerry Moro.

    pos and I should have a lot of fun with these. These drivers are ridiculously good. I kind of feel bad about making fun of their 3-inch voice coils early on. Obviously Jerry knew exactly what he was doing.

    I haven't decided yet if I am going to keep two pair, it is awfully tempting to build a pair of 4435-style enclosures for home theater use. The best waveguide that I have at present is the PT-H1010, pretty much a bolt-in for the older 2344.

    Hopefully pos will post about his impending project.
    Hi 4313B,

    interesting project. I can imagind that 2216 can be very good low mid bass driver. what would be crossover freuency when using PT-H1010, if You want to use with 2216. I can say around 1kHz. But for low bass section, and UHF, any suggestion?

    regards
    ivica

  9. #9
    Obsolete
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    NLA
    Posts
    12,193
    Have you start some of your projects?
    I have not been nearly as productive as I had wanted with respect to loudspeaker projects this summer. I haven't finished drawing up plans for some M2 enclosure clones. I have managed to veneer and finish my 4338/4365/Everest II hybrids. Hopefully I will be able to load the components this weekend.

    I mention Everest II only because all the components are DD67000 components, including the passive filters (formerly 4365 filters).

    Not a very impressive iPhone photo.
    Attached Images Attached Images  

  10. #10
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2010
    Location
    New London, WI
    Posts
    163
    In the past the LE10-H got praise mostly because it had no really nasty faults...that's it. I suspect this new beast will be more of the same. A driver that commits no major sins at all will probably make for a pleasant listening experience. It may not the best in any particular way, but I think you could call it very well optimized.

  11. #11
    Senior Member grumpy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    SoCal
    Posts
    5,743
    Reduced dynamic compression.

  12. #12
    Senior Member gibber's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2009
    Location
    Munich, Germany
    Posts
    168
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
    Reduced dynamic compression.
    There's two aspects to dynamic compression, i believe.

    In a large level scale context, most modern designs tend to be much better than the units they replace. Some say this started with SFG ferrites taking over from the earlier alnico's, but i actually believe it was most visible (sorry: audible) during the time when one to the next ferrite/neo iteration was done, just compare 2225 to 2226 at ++ volume.

    Second aspect is small scale or "inner" dynamic contrast. It is my (entirely personal) feeling that the newer high power coils and cones do swallow a lot of fine detail IF -big if- you don't use the large scale benefits. Because if you do, those will outshine (sorry: outsound) the benefits in inner dynamics the lighter coils / lighter cones do in my opinion have [i also interpret Aaron's "no major sins" comment this way, the newer structures tend to swallow fine detail + fine dynamics and avoid sharp breakups plus yield extra reliability in exchange].

    2216Nd can perhaps combine both benefits by going for a smaller / lighter 3" coil. I have no access to this engineering miracle, hope you can post on how it sounds when you get it.

    Ralph

  13. #13
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2008
    Location
    Gothenburg, Sweden
    Posts
    761
    Quote Originally Posted by grumpy View Post
    Reduced dynamic compression.
    Can that be seen in the specs?

  14. #14
    Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2009
    Location
    New England
    Posts
    84

    What happened ... please tell all

    Yes, this is an older thread, but an interesting one.

    Did many, or any, of these projects come to fruition?
    I am guessing folks probably used ported cabinets with internal volumes between 130-145 liters and vent tuning between the mid-20s to the low-30's Hz. My guesses are driven by specs for the M2 cabinet and the S-4700 cabinet. I don't know of any other cabinets that use the original 2216-nd woofer.

    Please share what you found or measured or photographed. I am quite interested since I recently received a pair of these woofers. They need a good home.

    Thanks,
    -Tom

  15. #15
    Guest
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Posts
    0
    They look great!
    nice veneer and blue front baffle, do you also have the original 4338 grill for them?

    I have collect most of the parts for my 4365 project except H4365 horns but I hope to get them soon

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2216ND Differential Drive
    By ronaltronics in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 50
    Last Post: 11-18-2022, 03:39 PM
  2. 2216Nd
    By Techbot in forum Transducer Information
    Replies: 3
    Last Post: 10-19-2012, 08:42 AM
  3. SUB1500 Projects
    By Niklas Nord in forum Lansing Product General Information
    Replies: 34
    Last Post: 11-18-2004, 02:55 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •