Results 1 to 14 of 14

Thread: JBL 2245 port location on a 10 cubic foot enclosure.

  1. #1
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    235

    JBL 2245 port location on a 10 cubic foot enclosure.

    Is there an exact location from the 2245 for the ports on the design for an enclosure of 10 cubic feet? I know that the port length is crucial to the tuning.

    Dave

  2. #2
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Feb 2007
    Location
    Christchurch, NZ
    Posts
    1,400
    Feel free to put the ports anywhere you like. The back of the cabinet looks the best as long as they can breathe.

    Allan.

  3. #3
    Senior Member ratitifb's Avatar
    Join Date
    Feb 2006
    Location
    France
    Posts
    653
    according to the wavelength at the tuning frequency i think that should not be so critical ...

  4. #4
    Senior Member Odd's Avatar
    Join Date
    May 2009
    Location
    Oslo, Norway ------ Now Portugal
    Posts
    812
    Placement of the port is not critical. You can place it wherever you want. You should probably have more than one.
    Download http://www.linearteam.dk/ so you can find the correct port size.
    It is not easy to find the correct internal volume of the enclosure, you must have measure equipment to tune the enclosure properly.
    43XX (2235-2123-2450-2405-CC 3155)5235-4412-4406-4401-L250-18Ti-L40-S109 Aquarius lV-C38 (030) 305P MkII

  5. #5
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    235
    Port size seems to be 9" or 2 x 6" I will make the length adjustable so I can get the best response.

    I guess it easy to reduce volume by adding some mass but not good to get it too small.

    Dave

  6. #6
    Senior Member Lee in Montreal's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2010
    Location
    Montréal
    Posts
    2,487
    A pair of 6" ducts is a good idea. Sonotube works fine.
    Three 4" will work too. I love ABS plumbing tubing

    Or Onken style cabinet/porting makes for a more rigid cabinet.

    Lee

  7. #7
    Senior Member Champster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    319
    David,
    While you're developing your build, have you considered using one of the designs in this article to optimize the use of a 2245?
    Paul

  8. #8
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    235
    Yes I have been trawling through all the threads on a build for the 2245 my biggest problem is finding some reasonably matched units with some JBL cones. There is an add on Ebay for a pair but he has used non JBL cones I guess its important that the units are genuine JBL?

    Whats the best crossover frequency from the 2245 to the JBL 2123H? Im crossing at 160Hz but can get modules to go lower if required.

  9. #9
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Aug 2010
    Location
    Jättendal (Giant Valley), Sweden
    Posts
    763
    I guess its important that the units are genuine JBL?
    Yes

    Regarding the port placement, if you place the port close to the floor, the tuning will be somewhat lower.

    Have a look at Onken designs.

  10. #10
    Senior Member Champster's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2014
    Location
    Wake Forest, NC
    Posts
    319
    David,

    My take on the port placement is that, at these frequencies, it doesn't matter where you put it, but, for it to breath properly, you'll need a full diameter of the port clearance from any object either inside or outside the cabinet.

    On the 2123H. I looked at that for the system I'm building, but I decided to try the 2206h (12") driver instead because it goes lower (handling more power) thus allowing for a crossover over below 100hz. This approach provides for a crossover free zone between ~80 & ~1000. Although I've never heard the 4345, I don't think I'd like it very much. The 2245 crosses over at 290 at only 12db/oct. I wouldn't like having the 18" driver going that high. So, I agree with your approach of crossing over the 2123 as low as possible. The 2123 has the ability to cross over to a 1" CD at a higher point, but will require about 5db of boost if you want to cross it over at ~160hz. You'll be able to have the high pass for the CD much higher than me. The only "cost" of crossing over the 2123 at 160hz will be lower total acoustic output just because the 2123 will run out of steam faster than the 2445 would at those frequencies. I would be willing to give that up to get the crossover point lower but I haven't calculated the max spl at 160hz that the 2123 will produce. I imagine, the output is pretty low but could be wrong.

    I opted to take Lee's advice and get a few frames and have them reconed. They are beautiful and although it was more money, I'm glad I did it this way. Even going this way, these are still relatively inexpensive drivers as it isn't hard to spend $1000 on a 15" subwoofer today from Focal, etc.

    I am also building something like a 4345 but with the 12" as mentioned above and a 2" compression driver. Both choices were based on the ability to have one crossover point in the 200 - 5000 range. My cabinet however is going to be significantly different than the 4345 and look a lot more like a K2 S9900. Are you using DSP?

    I wish we lived closer so we could compare the two approaches. Make sure your design includes mounting the 10" and the CD as close together physically as possible to get them to blend better and reduce the horn sound as much as possible.
    Paul

  11. #11
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    235
    The 2245 was crossed at 290Hz I believe and looks OK on the 2123 maybe that should be my crossover point? As soon as you start adding boost I find its detrimental to what you hear. The whole idea of multiple drivers is to match there frequency responses without adding in more complexity?
    I'm using a Marchand Active crossover and like its neutrality.

    Dave

  12. #12
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    Australia
    Posts
    7,956
    Keep the port(s) at leat one diameter clear of any side walls and at least one diameter clear of any rear walls.

    Keep insulation away from the port exists and smooth off the cut ends.

    There is a parameter call Q L where losses from resistive port flow impact on the tuning in large signal testing (not small signal) .

    I was watching the Aliens movie last night and when the LT426 blew up I could feel the air movement from the 2245 and vents across the room.

  13. #13
    Senior Member svollmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    598
    Quote Originally Posted by Ian Mackenzie View Post
    I was watching the Aliens movie last night and when the LT426 blew up I could feel the air movement from the 2245 and vents across the room.
    Awesome!!!!

  14. #14
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Dec 2011
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    309
    Quote Originally Posted by Champster View Post
    David,
    While you're developing your build, have you considered using one of the designs in this article to optimize the use of a 2245?
    Paul
    I 'd be more interested in sp. placement rather then the port..

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. 2245 Subwoofer Box 12 Cubic Ft
    By Robh3606 in forum Plans
    Replies: 0
    Last Post: 03-01-2009, 02:57 PM
  2. Port location question
    By robertbartsch in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 2
    Last Post: 01-12-2009, 09:39 AM
  3. L26 Port Length & location.
    By Wayne in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 07-15-2006, 07:08 PM
  4. Performance of 2123H in 1 cubic foot enclosure non vented with 75% fill
    By Ken Pachkowsky in forum Lansing Product Technical Help
    Replies: 15
    Last Post: 01-02-2004, 10:11 PM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •