Cumulative Spectral Decay from same measurements.
Burst Decay, most important, minimal resonances below 100Hz.
Forgott to mention that the mic(ListeningPos) is 6 meters away from where the speakers stands.
Six meters? That seems like a long way to sit from a pair of speakers.
I agreed that acoustical treatment is more important than simply replacing amp.but don't forget a better amp will make better sound in the same acoustical treated environment
BTW,data is not everything,we are not audio engineers,we just need pleasant sound to entertain our ears
46 lover
It seems to far away but it is not, the sound is equally good If I sit 3 meters as 6 meters.
It dosen't matter for me if it is near-field or far-fields speakers. They sound good anyhow.
If you know what to look for regarding interpreting the acoustical data, then the data matters. It is the acosutical properties from the loudspeakers to your ear that is important. You need to read more about this subject.
It has nothing to do with the amplifier, I allready have a better amp.
Hallo!
Just for the fun of it. I pull down Bobeccas MC252 and connected it in Mono-Bridged Mode to drive these little babies. 500Watts/speaker
Yeah, now we are talking
The only difference is more power.
I don't think that the low freq goes deeper. But, this can be measured. Of course, the mic and speakers schould be exactly at the same position when do this experiment and just change the amplifier from singel to mono.
Maybe some day I will do this.
To me.....the sound is the same, it only gives more power=more dynamics.
If I have 40% on my volume level on the preamp it gives 3dB or double the power from the amplifier to the loudspeaker.
If using singel amp in stereo then I don't have to force the amp as much as to compare to use in mono bridged.
If I have on my meters at -10db on the amp, with singel it gives 25Watts, the same in mono-bridged gives 50Watts. That's all.
There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)