Page 3 of 4 FirstFirst 1234 LastLast
Results 31 to 45 of 53

Thread: Thick cables sound better?

  1. #31
    Senior Member martin_wu99's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2007
    Location
    Xi'An,China
    Posts
    1,479
    Quote Originally Posted by pyonc View Post
    Hi guys,

    I know speaker cable topic has been covered in this forum before, but want to double check with your opinion and feedback.
    Do thicker speaker wires, say, 10 or 12 awg, sound better than thin ones such as 16 or 18 awg?
    Googling on this shows mixed opinion, with some going for thick cables (usually audiophiles), but others showing skeptic response.

    Personally I've used 16g wires for my bi-amped 4343 with good results in my basement listening room.
    Depending on your opinion, however, I'm thinking of switching to thicker cables, at least for for the woofers.
    I hear thicker cables work especially better for sub-woofers.

    Any feedback and comments would be welcome.
    Not so simple,i don't think so
    46 lover

  2. #32
    Senior Member pyonc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by hjames View Post
    No need for biwires on the usual 4343 speakers, unless you rebuild the crossover to use them.
    Thanks! That's what I guessed.
    I see high-end cables like MIT or Neotech are bi-wire cables...

  3. #33
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,742
    Quote Originally Posted by pyonc View Post
    Thanks! That's what I guessed.
    I see high-end cables like MIT or Neotech are bi-wire cables...
    Makes sense... that way they get to sell twice as much wire. Makes perfect sense from a business perspective.


    Widget

  4. #34
    Senior Member martin2395's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    930
    I tell you, all the money in MIT's went to the "magic boxes", military grade resistors, cryo treated coils

    I have a BiWire set but the low and high leads are shorted together, of course if I had the choice I'd go with single wire but at the price I bought mine for I won't complain...

  5. #35
    Moderator hjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NoVA - DC 'burbs
    Posts
    8,549
    I DO have a set of MIT Terminator 2 BiWire cables on my Biwire enabled Vandersteen 2CE speakers. Obviously, it is different than the Bi-Amp configuration I used on my JBL 4341 monitors, but on the biwired speakers, the MIT cables do quite well.

    Caveat: I got them used off CL for substantially LESS than retail price.

    Name:  MIT-T2_7878.jpg
Views: 5814
Size:  98.1 KB

    The casing was loose on one pair of the MIT cables, so, of course, I opened it to see what was inside -
    tho I did not fiddle with the encapsulated block I found inside.

    Name:  MIT-T2_7874.jpg
Views: 15236
Size:  70.6 KB
    2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
    7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460

  6. #36
    Senior Member martin2395's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    930
    Wow, I've never seen Terminator2 opened up yet, thank you for the pic!
    I've heard from a tech guy that the secret of MIT cables lies in their shielding/grounding principle and because they affect the amplifier's slew rate

    I'd never ever buy them new as the prices are riddiculous - $45k bucks for their TOTL loudspeaker cables.....sometimes you can get the older models very cheap through local ads.
    If you want the real deal from MIT's then I suggest you too lok for at least the MH-750 (versions with boxes) or Shotgun models, much better than the entry Terminator series.

    MIT's are kinda fake Bi-Wire cables as they always have single connectors on the amp side and within the box they just split to low and high outputs.
    By the way - those T2's look A LOT like Monster M1's, only the colours differ (M1 has black and white leads) and of course they don't use the Terminator box.

  7. #37
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Nov 2012
    Location
    Las Vegas
    Posts
    722
    Quote Originally Posted by pyonc View Post
    Thanks! That's what I guessed.
    I see high-end cables like MIT or Neotech are bi-wire cables...
    Neotech is the main OEM of many high end cable brands! The technology is not bs. They use a purer copper which is superior to OFC. That is a fact.
    S4700 owner.

  8. #38
    Moderator hjames's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2005
    Location
    NoVA - DC 'burbs
    Posts
    8,549
    Quote Originally Posted by martin2395 View Post
    Wow, I've never seen Terminator2 opened up yet, thank you for the pic!
    I've heard from a tech guy that the secret of MIT cables lies in their shielding/grounding principle and because they affect the amplifier's slew rate

    I'd never ever buy them new as the prices are riddiculous - $45k bucks for their TOTL loudspeaker cables.....sometimes you can get the older models very cheap through local ads.
    If you want the real deal from MIT's then I suggest you too lok for at least the MH-750 (versions with boxes) or Shotgun models, much better than the entry Terminator series.

    MIT's are kinda fake Bi-Wire cables as they always have single connectors on the amp side and within the box they just split to low and high outputs.
    By the way - those T2's look A LOT like Monster M1's, only the colours differ (M1 has black and white leads) and of course they don't use the Terminator box.
    That's what biwires are ... one connection on one end and dual connections at the speaker ends.

    I also have a pair of XO biwire cables that the Vandy 2CE seller threw in with the sale.
    They have full pairs of wire from the amp end - but honestly, the MIT T2 wires sound "better", and both sound better than just regular zip cords.

    If I could find a 20 foot pair of MIT T2 biwires for reasonable money, I get them to run my side surrounds with - they are Vandy 2CI and I run a single heavy copper cable pair to each them and made a pair of bridged jumpers that are at the speaker end. Those are "fake" biwires.

    And personally, due to the heavy handed lawsuit-crazed nature of the Monster company,
    I won't buy ANYTHING from them - they can rot for all I care.
    2ch: WiiM Pro; Topping E30 II DAC; Oppo, Acurus RL-11, Acurus A200, JBL Dynamics Project - Offline: L212-TwinStack, VonSchweikert VR-4
    7: TIVO, Oppo BDP103D, B&K, 2pr UREI 809A, TF600, JBL B460

  9. #39
    Senior Member ivica's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2008
    Location
    serbia
    Posts
    1,703

    Audio Cable Comparison

    Quote Originally Posted by ivica View Post
    Hi,

    We have to be aware of some physical cable properties

    10ft - 18awg - 0.064 Ohms

    http://www.cirris.com/testing/resistance/wire.html

    so for usually used 15ft - two wire cable, total resistance would be 3 * 0.064 about 0.2 Ohms, and if 8 Ohms speaker is used (neglecting amplifier output impedance) we can get 8/0.2 = 40 damping factor.

    regards
    ivica
    VERY, VERY interesting explanations and cable comparison

    http://diyaudioprojects.com/Technica...elson-Pass.pdf

    regards
    Ivica

  10. #40
    Senior Member
    Join Date
    Apr 2011
    Location
    Leesburg, VA
    Posts
    322
    Cable high-frequency terminations can make a difference:

    http://sound.westhost.com/cable-z.htm

    I use ordinary large gauge twisted pair, but terminate the speaker end as Rod suggests.
    Oppo BDP-95 DCX-2496 RMX-850 Parasound A21 First Watt J2 Dayton RSS390HF-4 MTM Quads of SEAS W18E001 511Bs TAD TD-2002

  11. #41
    Senior Member svollmer's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Northern VA
    Posts
    598
    Quote Originally Posted by hjames View Post
    And personally, due to the heavy handed lawsuit-crazed nature of the Monster company,
    I won't buy ANYTHING from them - they can rot for all I care.
    Boy do I agree with that! Bose is another famous for suing everyone. They sued Thiel in the 1990's because Thiel called a model the 2.2 and Bose had a 2.2. So Thiel changed the name to 2 2. I'm surprised Bose didn't already trademark the "space".

  12. #42
    Senior Member pyonc's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2009
    Location
    Maryland
    Posts
    711
    Quote Originally Posted by martin2395 View Post
    I tell you, all the money in MIT's went to the "magic boxes", military grade resistors, cryo treated coils

    I have a BiWire set but the low and high leads are shorted together, of course if I had the choice I'd go with single wire but at the price I bought mine for I won't complain...
    Pics tell all, after all. Like hjames showed her MIT cables.
    Can you upload some pics of your MIT biwire speaker cables hooked into your 4343 terminals on the back?
    I'm getting curious.

  13. #43
    RIP 2021 SEAWOLF97's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2006
    Location
    in "managed decline"
    Posts
    10,054
    Quote Originally Posted by svollmer View Post
    Boy do I agree with that! Bose is another famous for suing everyone. They sued Thiel in the 1990's because Thiel called a model the 2.2 and Bose had a 2.2. So Thiel changed the name to 2 2. I'm surprised Bose didn't already trademark the "space".
    Now it's that fruity company and their Korean rivals suing each other because they own the rights to the shape of "rectangle" or "rounded corners"

    but yeah, Munster and Boze are low on my lists too, but I'm amazed by how many intelligent people think it's great stuff.

    when I was on "audio street" in TPHCMC , looking at connectors ....they had Munster and generic side by side. Either the generic was a perfect 100% copy or they were both made in the same factory. There was about a 15X difference in price. Guess which one I picked ?
    Some kind of happiness is measured out in miles

  14. #44
    Senior Member martin2395's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2012
    Location
    Europe
    Posts
    930
    You underestimate the power of commercials

    Btw, pyonc the low and high outputs are simply shorted together, no magic here:


  15. #45
    Administrator Mr. Widget's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2003
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    9,742
    Quote Originally Posted by martin2395 View Post
    ...no magic here...


    Perhaps not much science either.

    Widget

Thread Information

Users Browsing this Thread

There are currently 1 users browsing this thread. (0 members and 1 guests)

Similar Threads

  1. Power cables
    By Rolf in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 22
    Last Post: 10-04-2023, 06:10 AM
  2. JBL67000 ranked 4th in 2012-2013 stereo sound golden sound award
    By martin_wu99 in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 46
    Last Post: 06-05-2013, 10:38 AM
  3. JBL Thick Baffle Paint
    By Zekeman in forum Lansing Product DIY Forum
    Replies: 1
    Last Post: 08-12-2012, 08:40 PM
  4. Replies: 6
    Last Post: 02-28-2011, 10:30 AM
  5. What can cables do?
    By Rolf in forum General Audio Discussion
    Replies: 66
    Last Post: 01-21-2007, 08:26 AM

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •